Show how to build a CNC machine from the very beginning to the end

[Skyfire]

I'd keep it, use it as your customers would, and use it hard. See what breaks, or can be improved, and incorporate those changes into the second machine.

Yes. This something I will do and actually I have been tried to break it today. I tried to push the spindle to peak output today under overload cutting conditions. The tool and the aluminium material became very hot and I couldn't touch by hand. Then after a while the aluminium turned sticky and the tool then jammed and blew the main 5A fuse of this machine. So I guess the peak motor output has been upto 2-3HP. This showed the BLDC system is quite powerful for a 0.75HP motor. Then I changged a new fuse and the machine functional again and no part damaged.

I blew the fuse when cutting this big groove by a 10mm tool


And also this prototype will be used for any further upgrading or develpment parts like 4th axis.

[Skyfire]

Whew, glad the loose tool issue was just the lack of a spanner.

I hope the 4th axis design gets off the drawing board before the lathe is thought about.

I couldn't think of any current design upgrade, apart from coolant, one shot lube and/or built in ratio change....maybe a QCT or power drawbar, that would make the machine more versatile....if you increase the X, Y or Z range you just start getting out of proportion....... this is something like pumping a midget full of steroids in the hope that he'll exceed the 4 minute mile record....LOL.

If the machine build went to ICNC-2 or 3, and the parameters were scaled up, all you'd achieve is another big mill and a higher cost pro rata, eventually you'd have to decide if you really want to have another knee mill as big as a Bridgeport.....LOL.

On the topic of a CNC lathe, it would be cool to have a midi lathe that really barked......something that would hold a 30mm bar of steel through the headstock and have a gang tool slide for simplicity......short bed and no tailstock.......I'm not all that wowed by a slant bed design.

In my opinion, the moment you have an enclosure and coolant gushing at a rate of knots, it becomes something like a commercial scene where you just become an operator that pushes the green button when the red light flashes.....or feed bars as the hungry beast gnaws away to itself, but if the need is for a commercial machine, then the list is already long and as varied as the price range.

One of the most sort after aspects of lathe design, be it manual or CNC, is the ability to cut any thread pitch electronically.

If the design also incorporated a milling head on the tool slide, then that makes it pretty versatile.
Ian.

Hi,

Yes. just the spanner issue. I got a new one today and fastened the tool well today and did the heavy cutting tests again. Nothing like pulling out collet happened again

I will still focus on the mill and it's optional parts including the 4th axis in near future. I think I probably can start a lathe project when eveything is on the way for this mill series. I think it will be somthing like you said, and hope to intigrate many good features..

I think for now I have finished the whole body of this ICNC-1, and I will provide some accessory options like coolants(this is easy thing), different ratio gears&belts and electric spindle system. Considering the shipping size issue, The enclosure maybe too big for most users. and It's easy to build as what you want.. This can be a DIY thing.. I can provide a full enclosure type too, but I think it will be an optional part too. The basic type machine should be most performance cost for most users now. And other things are just depend on different needs.

[Skyfire]

Hi, spoil sport......I was just thinking we'd be offered a good deal on the demo model after the testing.

Possibly the first item to become a problem would be the ball screws if they had single nuts, and any form of backlash here would cause grief.....I would have preferred to have a slightly longer table and saddle casting to allow double ballnuts, but as the current design has travel of 200 X 125 X 200, any extra on the nuts would reduce this spec unacceptably.

It could be done for the Mark 2 model, with the same design characteristics but double nuts.

I don't think Skyfire is going to saw the patterns in half to add a few more millimetres of length to the castings, although it would not take much to do that.....hmmmmm......maybe the steppers could be moved back a bit, I don't know if that is possible, but if it could be, that would be my preference.

The photos in post #90 show that there is still some room at the end of the screw mounting blocks under the table to allow this to happen.

Double ball nuts, although costing more, would be an option most would want to have to ensure tight resolution figures were maintained......this would also apply to a better class of ballscrew, once you experience the quality of the machine you want it to last forever.

What would be the sense of saving $100 on a ball screw if the better one was available in the beginning.
Ian.

I've thought about the double nut ballscrews before but just this single nut type on this prototype to save some cost. But the axis spaces are able to contain the double nut ballscrews but need to move the position of some ballscrew mounts. So.. Anyway it's also avaliable but some slight change of the sketch. Maybe I should take this as another option

Thank you for bring out this question my friend, I almost forget this issue

[Skyfire]

Hi guys. I think I've fnish the total tests today. Here are my test results today including:

1. aluminum cuttings
2. steel cuttings
3. long time cutting test and overload destructive cutting test
4. programed cuttings both on aluminum&steel material, real cutting accuracy measurement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. aluminum cuttings

I repeated the mass material removing test under JOG mode as yesterday and fastened the collet tightly with a new spanner. No tool loose happened again. The cutting video I will post soon tomorrow.


2. steel cuttings

I tested this with a 45# steel board and proved the machine can handle steel cut no problem. Just don't run upon the spindle power capacity and don't destroy the tool

Here are several cuting pictures under jod mode.






3. long time cutting test and overload destructive cutting test

I run the machine over 10 hours today and no any abnormal things happend. The transformer is not even worm. all drivers keep low temperature under the fan cooling. spindle and spindle motor din't overheat. The stepper motors are some hot but within the normal stepper motor temperature range.

I run the spindle to extream conditions of jamming tools under a very hard condition as I replied to diyengineer. Even the main fuse blew the machine is still no further damage and did the following program cutting tests and passed the accuracy measurement.

4. programed cuttings both on aluminum&steel material

a. firstly I generated a G code to mill a 6mm hight, 30mm OD cylinder on the aluminm material. This is a simple way to test many real cutting features of X,Y,Z axis travel accuracy, repeat accuracy and X,Y perpendicularity. Any feature no good will cause the cylinder size big error especially the circular degree. I measured the cylinder hight, OD from many directions to check the cutting accuracy. the measurement showed the actural cutting accuracy is good --- all under 0.02mm. typically 0.01mm. This result declared that the machine system accuracy reached the target of industrial level.







b. Then I tested another program of pocket milling both on aluminum and steel material. I used 6mm end mill tool on AL material and a 8mm end mill tool on steel material. So the ID should be 50mm for AL one, and 52mm for steel one. Here is the cutting results and measurement. The cutting surfaces are perfect smooth and the measurement error is very good too.

















Here... all my fruits today


Here are the total results today. So all approving tests are finished now... Next I will organize the datasheet and preparing marketing works.

[wizard]

I'm on my way to Cabin Fever which is a small engine / model engineering show / auction and a what have you event. Cabin Fever is in York PA, it is too bad you are on the other side of the planet, I suspect many people would love to see this machine there. There certainly is a segment of model engineers that would be interested in a machine this size.

Since I'm in a hotel right now with nothing to do I have a few comments that have been on my mind while on the road.

1. Skyfire is certainly a good name for the company that will market the machines but I think you need a system for naming individual machines. In this case the idea came to me to call this machine "SVM-0". For Skyfire Vertical Mill zero. It might seem silly right now but ten years down the road when you have a half dozen machines to sell it might be useful to have a system. Simple names help with customer interface and user communications. For example in the USA if you mention HLV you know exactly what type of machine is being discussed. If you come out with a lathe you might want to name the first one "SHL-0"for Skyfire Horizontal Lathe zero. The model names should effectively link the tools to your company.
2. When you first started this thread you indicated an interest in an engraving machine. At that point I don't think anybody was concerned about the column cross sectional size. When refocusing the machine on milling you may have created a problem in that the column could end up stressed more than it should be, this could especially be the case if you go to a much larger ER collet. Due to this issue I'd suggest verifying that the machine can mechanically handle the stress trying to run large tools on the machine might create. This really isn't a huge machine by any measure so I'm not sure there is a lot of value in giving it huge ER capacity. I really see this as a much better TAIG sized mill. This may lead to argument with others but I think your gut instinct was right going with the original ER size. This is especially the case because I you machine easily allows for much higher spindle speeds than run of the mill low cost machines. I'd love a machine that can handle ISO 20 or 30 tapers but I don't think this will ever be that machine. Better to keep focused on a specific market.
3. Somebody else mentioned taper lock pulleys for easy ratio changes, that isn't a bad idea as it keeps the rest of the machine simple. Previously I was concerned about low end torque but I'm just not sure this is the machine to leverage big cutters or to dril,or bore large diameter holes. ER collets themselves are a limitation here. Even an RB spindle has more capability to handle odd tooling than ER collets.
4. I'm a bit concerned about the machine ability to meet regulations in many countries. Frankly I'm not up to speed with respect to the latest regulations in the USA, but Underwriters and the NFPA each have requirements. OSHA is another problem if you sell to businesses. In the EU countries I'm not sure this machine would fly at all. In any event nobody cares about the EU, you should however get a UL stamp for the machine if it goes on sale in North America. There ought to be some sort of help to get this done in China. Yes this will add to the cost of the machine but I think it is important.
5. I really like that you haven't abandoned support for the engraving spindle. This could be a very useful option for the mill.
6. Likewise I'm glad to see you have interest still in supporting servos for the axis. It might make for an interesting combination when combined with the engraving spindle.
7. If atall possible consider supporting EMC! It is an excellent platform, more importantly it removes the burden of having to run Windows. Further Machs support of lathes is wanting. EMC will allow you to support a wider array of machines in the future.
8. It would be nice to have a switched AC outlet (IEC type) built into the machine. This to be tied to M functions most likely for coolant. The outlet should be fused.
9. I like the two tone paint! ������. It just looks good in the pictures. Paint is as much about the brand as anything else. If you like it I'd stick with the combo for a long time.
10. X travel is very limited on this machine. Again that was most likely fine for an engraver when first thinking about the machine. I probably wouldn't change it on this model but if you decide to build a large machine (SVM-1 for example) you might want to consider a much longer X travel.
11. Of course an SVM-1 machine would need to be targeted at a different market with a drawbar spindle and an overall larger size.

In any event that is the list for now, got to get up early for Cabin Fever!

[handlewanker]

Hi Sky, well the proof is certainly in the pudding......cutting steel is the proof I need to know it's capable and able to handle all materials without any deflection or shuddering from the column.

The ultimate judgement here is that all the tests were carried out cutting dry, no coolant etc, so if coolant were also present the cutting ability would be even better.

Alluminium does tend to get soft and sticky when cut dry, fast and with force, and it doesn't help the process when the ally gets coated onto the tool causing more friction and heat.

I agree with the problem of supplying an enclosure for the finished product......maybe a plan of a suitable design could be posted, but most people will no doubt make their own if needed.

Personally, I have thought that a dedicated DIY stand with an acrylic type enclosure would be the answer.

A stand made from 50mm X 25mm square steel tubing and having a large angled sheet steel raised rim 150mm high around the edges, with the acrylic shield dropping down into it sealed at the edges all round, and a sliding door at the front for access.

If the bottom of the floor of the stand, where the mill sits on, has each side open to allow swarf and coolant to fall through to a collection tub inside the cabinet, this would make clearing the swarf and draining the coolant easy.

I don't think compressed air is a good idea where precision sliding members are present, so I probably would have mist cooling for the cutter and job and a loose manual hose for flood coolant to flush the chips off the job and down into the bottom of the cabinet.

At any rate, coolant would be an option to be added etc, and with coolant and swarf in abundance, an enclosure is a very big second must have feature, otherwise you'll be wearing it big time.

I don't think soluble oil type coolant is a good idea, although simple and cheap, it does deteriorate rapidly and the bacterial growth, once present is extremely hard to remove and keep away.....so is the smell of old soluble oil coolant......bacterial growth is contributory to dermatitis, where if you get it you have to have total skin protection for ever more.

I would expect to pay some more for a synthetic type coolant, the pale green stuff, as it has qualities far in advance to simple soluble oil.

One thing I will strongly advise, and that is coming from a background of occupational health and safety......DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES USE CUTTING OIL FOR COOLANT OR TOOL LUBRICANT, that is unless the cutting oil, (the stuff that resemble dark brown gearbox oil) is supplied in a continuous flood, and not dabbed on with a brush or spray bottle, and is ventilated to remove the fumes that occur.

Many years ago an occurrence occurred where an employee obtained a new unused drum of obsolete to requirements cutting oil used in a Mikron Haesler rotary transfer machine, and as the oil was top quality it was thought to be suitable for everyday DIY lathe work as a drip feed/dab on coolant etc.

Cutting oil, with all it's additives, if allowed to fume when it gets hot without a flood, gives off a smoke that causes flu like symptoms and eventually by long exposure is contributory to emphysema etc.

I had a sore throat for three months before the effects were traced back to just one nights lathe work with that oil.

For that matter, all coolant fumes should be vented.

Now we must wait for the bottom line cost.....with bated breath....LOL.
Ian.

[handlewanker]

Hi Wiz, a good number of points you made.

I personally would like an R8 with draw bar for the spindle, mainly to emulate the Tormach system of TTS, but as that means a spindle with a long hole through it, this is probably complicating the issue for the supplier, but in that case I would go for the ER 32 collet end as it allows the max size of 20mm diam for parallel shank tooling to do QCT set ups and also emulate the TTS method, while at the same time being able to hold bigger tools for lighter machining, like fly cutters or boring heads........even a 5 tip facing cutter could be used with discretion, but I don't think it would work on a 20mm shank, so that would not be a must have.

The machine must still be used within it's capacity, no matter what cutter combination is envisaged, but a smaller shank size is not one that I would want to go downsize on.

The whole point of having this machine is, there is nothing like it on the market that would approach it's capability and match the price, especially if you compromised and bought a same size current bench top manual mill, and wanted to convert it to CNC.

The table length "could" be a bit longer and the saddle travel too, but now we're looking at the next machine build, and if the table was an issue I'm sure a longer one could be supplied as an option for those that needed it, as all it needs is a longer casting and longer rails/ballscrew etc........the saddle travel would mean a complete new base longer casting, not really practical.

I like the colour too, it grows on you.
Ian.

[Skyfire]

Hi wizard. Thank you for your great points here! Yes, It's really a pity that I'm on the other side of the planet.. It will be much better if the earth is a village.. I suppose those model engineers will review this forum if they are looking for a good modeling machine...

I agree that "Skyfire CNC" will be the best name from your suggestion and "SVM-0" as the individual name of this one! It's a good idea and I think I can just follow your advise!

I decided the ER25 spindle basicly consindering the machine size and cutting capacity also. I think ER25 should be the most fitful size to this machine until handlewanker brought the QCT issue. I think even go with ER32 we should also be carefully about the tool size selecting. Too large tools are obviously not fitful and I think not too necessory too. During my real cutting tests I concluded the column is stiff enough for milling capacity. When I develop a bigger type one, I think I will go with R8 spindle and a strongger column design.

I think the high speed range with 2:1 ratio pulley and work with small tools is more important than lower end torque now. I have proved that the machine can handle steel cuttings with 8-10mm tools no problem. I think this the fitful tool size for this machine with enough torque. taper lock pulley will be good for easy exchanging. This will be a probable develop next but need some support from spindle motor supplier side. This will only be possible unit I have many pcs orders.. I have some similiar but easy ideas too and will be no problem in the motor speed range without dynamic balance.

I know something about the regulations in different countries. This will be a formal issue when I really get strongger business. At the begining, I may not be able to get the certifications because of the cost issue. I'd like to get some other way out like selling the machine as a "kit" But I'm sure the the machine electric system is not any less than the regulations. I would like to get some local dealers in different areas then and solve such problems together. I have many experiences to export similiar CNC machines to US and have no problem.

Various optional accessories like the electric spindle will always be a concern to me. I will do my best to provide satified machines to individual users to meet their needs. Next most urgent project is to develop a 4th axis set for this machine when begining the business.

Servos are always the optional item in my mind. Stppers are most economic and enough for most jobs. But I know many people would like to cost some more money for Servos. I provide this option too..I have the right resource of BLDC/DC servo driving parts... So this is not a problem too.

Certainly the machine will support EMC without problem. the IO channels on my controller board actually can accept signals from any upper computer even MODBUS controller. It's just pulse/direction signal interface. A simple jumper on the controller board can ignor the MACH software charge pump function and accept other signal resource. And users can add in their favorate controller also..

I left a space inside the electric case that can be used to install the relay board to control anything like coolant pump... And my controller board provide the relay control interface also.. I think it's a easy thing to do.. Thank you~

I like the color way myself...I think this two tone color way will be my brand machine choice.

I understand about the X traveling range issue.. I'm considering the optional choice of a longger worktable also to provide maybe 10" travel range. But too long worktable will more trend to transform and cause accuracy drop. So I think 10" travel should be the max for this machine.

Yes. I think future SVM-1 will be a different thing that may not fitful to home users but more of a shop users. It should be more traditional with drawbar spindle and larger size to handle different level works.

I hope you have great fun there today!

[Skyfire]

Hi handlewanker! The cutting steel capacity is certainly proved now! The machine didn't get shake or made abnormal sound like a old car The cutting process was stable only with the cutting sound and the loose vise handle noise. The column showed strong too and the cutting pattern proved to be very smooth.

I will upload the videos tomorrow.. I need my friend upload them to Youtube for me...But today the aluminum cutting video is avaliable and I will post now

The important issue here, as you said, all of the cutting tests were dry cut. It's really some bad cutting conditions making the cut hard. I'm sure with some coolant it will be even better. So I think my tests were under some most difficult conditions then.

I think it will be some DIY fun to build a enclosure for it on user end. A simple tray or some "delux" enclousre as you said. I will be no problem to provide finished enclosure with machine.. or provide enclousre solutions.

Coolant will be very easy thing to add on the machine. And controled by M code with a extra relay board connected to the controller. I will provide the relay board, or user can make by themselves because it's pretty easy thing to DIY.

I don't know much about the coolant type. But I quite agree that the soluble oil is pretty bad...I used it before and will never touch it again I'm sure we should listen to your suggestions from many experiences here!

I will get the last cost very soon.. just working on many optional items now.. I think the basic price will not have much change

[Skyfire]

Here is the Skyfire CNC mass material removing demo video. Still did that under JOG mode.

[Skyfire]

Here is the CNC cutting demo videos:

[Skyfire]

[wizard]

Nice videos!

You really have me reconsidering doing a CNC conversion. I don't see anyway to achieve the quality this machine demonstrates, here in the USA, at the price you are asking. I'm good at scrounging too but a conversion would cost me considerable money and still not have the features your mill has.

I hope you get your web site up and going soon with all of the documentation.

[Skyfire]

Nice videos!

You really have me reconsidering doing a CNC conversion. I don't see anyway to achieve the quality this machine demonstrates, here in the USA, at the price you are asking. I'm good at scrounging too but a conversion would cost me considerable money and still not have the features your mill has.

I hope you get your web site up and going soon with all of the documentation.

Hi my friend.

Thank you for watching my demo videos. I do think the coversion will not be as good as originally built CNC machines because of many features of the manual mills are solid and can't be good enough for CNC requests... So..If any one want a real CNC without accuracy or performance problem.. I suggest to chose an original CNC. Of course, I'm not just saying limited to mine.

I'm working really hard on building my website now and have many documents drafted now. I think the documents will be avaliable in several days. the website may be avaliable around one week. I think I will announce to taking orders formally within this term.

Thank you very much for many of your good points and suggestions again!

[handlewanker]

Nevertheless, the build from the ground up from pure design, as opposed to conversion or retrofitting, has to be more successful when you are designing a CNC to do a job, instead of hoping the parts you want to modify all stick together in some order not entirely as you'd like it to be......then there is the aspect of the cost of the outcome.......why pay for parts you will never use on the rebuild.

It will be interesting to see the eventual product offer.
Ian.

[wizard]

Nevertheless, the build from the ground up from pure design, as opposed to conversion or retrofitting, has to be more successful when you are designing a CNC to do a job,

Before CNC was wide spread, modifying basic tools to do a job was wide spread. I can remember work on some rather large Jerny Trecker mills that had axis driven with Air Over Oil cylinders with som odd indexing fixtures. I have no doubt that I can pull off a good conversion, but mills like this one really bring into question the economics of doing so.

instead of hoping the parts you want to modify all stick together in some order not entirely as you'd like it to be......then there is the aspect of the cost of the outcome.......why pay for parts you will never use on the rebuild.

This is certainly a problem. I'd go a bit further and suggest that some of the popular small mills barely pass as manual mills. This seems to be in about the same class as some of Little Machine Shops so called solid column mils but with better execution.

It will be interesting to see the eventual product offer.
Ian.

Yes it will! I'm overnighting close to the Grizzly store after visiting Cabin Fever and must say I'm not sure I should even be looking at a mill. It was my intention to pick one up this year, possibly a G0704 class machine, I will have to sleep on it now. The reality is I could spend as much as 3 grand by the time I finish the conversion and still not have anything near as good as this machine apparently offers. The only really significant issue I have with the machine is the axis travels.

In the end it will probably come down to initial costs. I can see I will be up half the night trying to make a decision.

[handlewanker]

Oooohhh Wizard, the tragedy of being spoilt for choice.

I would sum up the choice factor as to what do I want in a CNC mill, and the first thing that is paramount is the work envelope.....if you can't use it for the work you anticipate, it falls down totally.

The second thing would have to be the realistic innovative nature of the design, not just being different to be different, and in this case it beeps all the whistles that if you were to name them are present in this mill.

Then of course there is the price tag, but no one buys a machine on price alone, otherwise you'd be having brain surgery done with a pen knife.

I didn't see the original design drawings as the posts wouldn't open, but when I read the description of the build progress from post #4 or so I was highly intrigued.....this was not just another G0704 conversion or an SX3 makeover.

The final outcome of the Utube test runs and the videos were a clincher as to it's viability.....now we will have to wait to see what the bottom line will look like, but as it has been suggested that the price is holding fair, I expect the order book will run to volumes not pages.....LOL......with that we'd better start forming a queue....the lead time could get long.

I don't think I would be far wrong in thinking that if the axis travels were extended by 100mm for the X axis (and table length) and another 50mm for the Y, this is where the options would gravitate to.......everyone wants a bit more, so they must expect to be priced accordingly.

You can go overboard in this thinking and end up with a machine so out of proportion it fails to satisfy, but if the option was available, I think most buyers would want to go that way.
Ian.

[wizard]

Oooohhh Wizard, the tragedy of being spoilt for choice.

Spoiled yes, trying to fit things into a budget is really the frustrating bit here.

I would sum up the choice factor as to what do I want in a CNC mill, and the first thing that is paramount is the work envelope.....if you can't use it for the work you anticipate, it falls down totally.

On my way back home I stopped at the Grizzly store to look at the mills they have. Just to get a feel for them as I've decided to put things off till May 18th at the very least. May 18th Griz has their big annual sale.

I really think the G0704 represents a minimal size for me right now. The G0720 is almost exactly what I'd want to have if I didn't have other considerations. Those considerations being Money and figuring out how I would get the machine into the cellar where my shop is.

The second thing would have to be the realistic innovative nature of the design, not just being different to be different, and in this case it beeps all the whistles that if you were to name them are present in this mill.

Yeah this mill really distills things down to items that pay off. Interestingly he started off making a engraver yet it morphed very nicely into a mill.

Then of course there is the price tag, but no one buys a machine on price alone, otherwise you'd be having brain surgery done with a pen knife.

After this weekend with two different nights of insomnia it feels like somebody did brain surgery on me with a pen knife.

I didn't see the original design drawings as the posts wouldn't open, but when I read the description of the build progress from post #4 or so I was highly intrigued.....this was not just another G0704 conversion or an SX3 makeover.

Yeah I missed that stuff too. Unfortunately I don't really know what the X axis travel is off the top of my head but if I remember right it is extremely limited on this machine. This is another good reason to want the specs.

The final outcome of the Utube test runs and the videos were a clincher as to it's viability.....now we will have to wait to see what the bottom line will look like, but as it has been suggested that the price is holding fair, I expect the order book will run to volumes not pages.....LOL......with that we'd better start forming a queue....the lead time could get long.

Actually if he goes into volume production I would expect the price to go up. At that point he would have to higher an assembly team, probably setup a machine shop with a new mill and do other things to be successful. Beyond that if he authorizes an importer they will likely tack a profit of their own on. So yeah get in on the ground floor.

I don't think I would be far wrong in thinking that if the axis travels were extended by 100mm for the X axis (and table length) and another 50mm for the Y, this is where the options would gravitate to.......everyone wants a bit more, so they must expect to be priced accordingly.

I wouldn't mind paying a bit extra for a long table model. Ideally I want atleast 21" of travel on the X. With the current design that makes for a long table. Think here about a machine that can handle machining 19" rack front panels which yeah a good router can do in aluminum but maybe to so well in steel

You can go overboard in this thinking and end up with a machine so out of proportion it fails to satisfy, but if the option was available, I think most buyers would want to go that way.
Ian.

This will likely become one of the better deals on the market if he can maintain the proposed pricing structure. It may be possible, I was on Quality Machine Tools web site and the are expecting "45" class CNC mills in the near future at around $7000. Novakon has a fairly large mill they where demoing at Cabin Fever at a very interesting price point considering what one gets with the Novakon. The problem is right now I have no place to put such machinery this I'm a bit twisted by looking at small machines due to space and $$.

Oh well I have so many projects that I need to do this year that I'm not sure what I will do about a mill.

[handlewanker]

Hi Wizz, imagine coming home and saying, "Hey, guess what, I bought a mill".....followed by a deadly silence as she who must be obeyed says, "What the heck do I want a flour mill for, the bread's delivered".

There's just no simple way that anyone can imagine how to explain it's just for fun....unless you have a production run item, just for fun is the best excuse.

One thing's for sure, there'll be no more unaccompanied trips to machinery fairs for you for a very long time.

As far as I can recollect, the XYZ travels are 200 X 125 X200.....small envelope, but if you start at the ICNC-0 model and work round the requirements for all and sundry, pretty soon you'll have a Bridgeport and then some want a longer table on that one too.

I used to doodle on a piece of melamine board a mill for a DIY build that would cover a small job about the size of a CD, a 5" cubic block capacity......circuit boards and model engineering stuff etc, and always the build plan grew bigger and bigger, so you just have to emphasise the direct and immediate need and work to a plan.

You don't have to justify anything when you just want to have fun.

I'm polishing the family jewels at the moment, ready to get a quick redemption appraisal at the local pawn shop, so perhaps the stamp collection and the baggy bottom designer shorts I bought in the 80's and never wore will get added to the pile.

After I explained all the working parts of a CNC mill to my daughter, she said, "Yes, I understand how it works, but what do you want to do with it?".......welllllll, I've played with all my other toys, so this is a newie on the block.....LOL.....I'm never going to grow up.
Ian.

[Skyfire]

Hi Wizz, imagine coming home and saying, "Hey, guess what, I bought a mill".....followed by a deadly silence as she who must be obeyed says, "What the heck do I want a flour mill for, the bread's delivered".

There's just no simple way that anyone can imagine how to explain it's just for fun....unless you have a production run item, just for fun is the best excuse.

One thing's for sure, there'll be no more unaccompanied trips to machinery fairs for you for a very long time.

As far as I can recollect, the XYZ travels are 200 X 125 X200.....small envelope, but if you start at the ICNC-0 model and work round the requirements for all and sundry, pretty soon you'll have a Bridgeport and then some want a longer table on that one too.

I used to doodle on a piece of melamine board a mill for a DIY build that would cover a small job about the size of a CD, a 5" cubic block capacity......circuit boards and model engineering stuff etc, and always the build plan grew bigger and bigger, so you just have to emphasise the direct and immediate need and work to a plan.

You don't have to justify anything when you just want to have fun.

I'm polishing the family jewels at the moment, ready to get a quick redemption appraisal at the local pawn shop, so perhaps the stamp collection and the baggy bottom designer shorts I bought in the 80's and never wore will get added to the pile.

After I explained all the working parts of a CNC mill to my daughter, she said, "Yes, I understand how it works, but what do you want to do with it?".......welllllll, I've played with all my other toys, so this is a newie on the block.....LOL.....I'm never going to grow up.
Ian.

Hi my friend. You always have the interesting words here... very funny..haha..

I've been busy these two days with a lot of business things to deal with.

hmm.. Just a small correction. the travel range of this machine is 210*140*200mm. or 8.3"*5.5"*8"

I really consdiering to make the formal products with longger worktable. like X travel 10"...

It's very popular psychology that we always want "bigger" machines.. I think it's very similiar to that when we buy a new PC. We always hope the fatest CPU, biggest hard drive and RAM..etc. But an important question is: What you want to with it? I think every choice must be reasonable depending on your needs, and budget also. I would like to have a machine as big as possible to do various works.. including possible works in future. But must be permitted by my wallet now..and consider the future needs reasonably. If I want to buy a CNC for my workshop for business, I will buy a big machine just if I can pay it; If I'm a modeling engineer, or home DIYer, I will buy a small machine just covering my small work range...Just based on the real need at now.

As a machine provider, I think my target is to providing series machines of different size and satisfie different custom with different needs.

I've finished the initial version of the datasheet. But some pictures inside need further edit now.. But anyone want the current version can email me..