Interesting idea....not something i would do
I haven't seen too many examples of this configuration and I was just wondering why?
Is it too complex, not overkill?
On first thougth, it seems to have alot going for it, besides the cost of extra components.
The spindle mount would be very simple with the minimum of overhang and one could have a longer Z axis to allow for higher jobs.
Have I missed something obvious?....
I hope to be building a T Slot Router one day and I would like to know if this is a viable option.
Your thoughts?
Steve
Similar Threads:
Interesting idea....not something i would do
Why?..too complex and/or expensive?
Pro's and Cons depend on what you are comparing it to. A single spindle machine, or an ATC machine.
Pro's:
If most of your work only requires 2 tools, then it's much faster than a single spindle machine, and even an ATC machine.
It's slightly to a lot cheaper than an ATC, depending on the ATC spindle you choose.
Con's:
You need two of everything.
Two leadscrews. Two sets of linear rails. Two spindles. Two steppers or servos, and two drives. Two VFD's*.
It's twice as heavy.
It's bigger, requiring a longer gantry.
Chinese ATC's can now be found for as low as $1500, but when you add toolholders and everything else you need for an ATC, you'll usually be at about $3000 or more.
A dual Z axis can be done for less than $1000.
Gerry
UCCNC 2017 Screenset
[URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html[/URL]
Mach3 2010 Screenset
[URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html[/URL]
JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
[URL]http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html[/URL]
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Sorry, I tried to find a pic of what I was thinking about but couldn't find one.
My idea was to raise and lower the Gantry with a stepper at each end of the gantry instead of raising and lowering the Spindle.
One spindle and one VFD.
But you are correct....twice as many linear rails , ball screws, steppers and drivers.......
and still have dual Y axis as well...lol
Steve
I have a feeling i might build a big machine in the near future....something that can handle full sheets..2.4 x 1.2 m
Oh, I thought you meant dual spindle, but you're talking about a gantry that moves up and down.
Not sure any benefits would outweigh the cons. Much more weight to move up and down, and more money. And the only benefit is more gantry clearance?
Gerry
UCCNC 2017 Screenset
[URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html[/URL]
Mach3 2010 Screenset
[URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html[/URL]
JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
[URL]http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html[/URL]
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Hi - Some large scale 3D printers do this. But for a router I think it would increase the wobble factor. The gantry is on two rails and as it moves one side leads the other then the other side catches up. This occurs no matter the drive system. The elastic properties of the system dictate this. It's sort of a slip/stick mechanism. So you will have horizontal and vertical stick/slip occurring exaggerating the wobbles of the structure. I think the cons win... Ericks keep an eye on Maximus it will be real soon...Peter
Careful design can also minimize spindle overhang.
And your just shifting the Z axis ballscrew somewhere else, and doubling it. Make one part simpler, and two parts more complex.
Gerry
UCCNC 2017 Screenset
[URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html[/URL]
Mach3 2010 Screenset
[URL]http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html[/URL]
JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
[URL]http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html[/URL]
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
I actually made my first Openbuilds machine with this design, for the same reasons you listed.
In my case, while it worked, the design of the gantry wasn't strong enough for its height. I'd like to try it again someday, but only as a thought experiment. I've gone on to a much stronger standard-gantry system now.
Having said that, if I had a market for something that needed a large Z travel I might very well try it again. It does solve a few problems but really only in a narrow use category.