pls, is it possible to use g22 for c axis ?

[deadlykitten]

hello, please, is it possible to use g22 for c axis ?

i wish to rechuck a part with a side hole, and orientate the hole among x axis / kindly

Similar Threads:

• Need Help!- OKK VP400 5 AXIS Z AXIS OFFSET ERROR WHEN MACHINE TURN A AND C AXIS
• Open Source : 4 axis and 5 axis print with a 3 axis milling in order to have a 5 axis
• Unwinding the rotary axis ( 4 axis rotary axis milling fanuc control)
• Need Help!- 4th axis rotation on x axis chaging to Y axis in simulation

[deadlykitten]

hy mr wizard no, it didn't work

    G29 PC=30 ( 2277-01 ALARM-B DATA WORD torque limit A side 1 )
    G22 PC=25 C+10 F+60(100*5) G94 D+12.5 ( L0 still going )
    G28

upper torque limit is at 60%

but look what i found inside error's description ( is like there is possible to use PC and PM ) :

7 ->When it was not C axis connection, PC instruction was done by G22/G23/G29.
8 ->When it was not M-axis specification, PM instruction was done by G22/G23/G29.
9 ->PW and WT instructions were designated at the same time by G22.

i may be missing something, because it did not showed " no-spec alarm " / kindly

ps : please, what means WT from point 9 ?

[deadlykitten]

if you wish, please check attached seems that such an option was released recently

[OkumaWiz]

Now that’s a new one! Never seen it before.

I’m guessing there is a new torque limit parameter for c axis then?

Best regards,

[deadlykitten]

hy, i think that this capability is there from some time, as PC appears inside manuals, in G22 context; it may be spec, but it hadn't been presented so far

from time to time, i scroll the okuma website, and recently i saw it

i think that torque limiter parameter is the same as the existing one, as it is targeting only the upper limit, beyond which is not allowed to pass when using G29

---

a few months ago, when i needed this, i simply used spindle's phase ( CD on screen ), and a live tool that was aligned among X axis, but offseted in Y; normally, Y offset should have been 0, but sometimes is possible to go like that now, looking back at it, i think i could have ignored also the X alingment

is possible to have same origin for C axis and M19, so to switch between them without losing phase / kindly

[deadlykitten]

solved ... if you wish, check attaced

Now that’s a new one! Never seen it before.

hy mr wizard, the capability is there from more than 10years ago, only that manuals are not updated; thus even new revisions are incomplete on some topics

this function popped in the manuals around 2020 ... and there are still many hidden things

i may be missing something, because it did not showed " no-spec alarm

hello past self of myself that's because alarms related to missing specs are not always the same

is possible to have same origin for C axis and M19, so to switch between them without losing phase

this works only for static/positioning, because as rpm increases, it will offset the m19 origin ... still, can be solved

hy, i think that this

you where thinking ? haha ... i found some of my stuff from 2018, and i was so stupid .. same for 2021, and i may still be, and miss a big thing ?! i just don't see it now, but, omg !