hi, pls share tool geometry, drawing before and after the operation / i will give you code
ps : i know, Z0 at left of the part
Hi Guys,
I would greatly appreciate some help with my OSP7000 control.
Im working inside the bore of a hollow part and prior to parting off, I chamfer the inside corner.
I make a clearance groove and then put a radius on the created corner.
I am now unable to make the control do this for some reason.
I have TNR P value set to 1 and 0.4mm rad for X and Z.
The radius is not where it should be on the animation and appears to be the wrong rad.
When I change the TNR values to '0' its all fine in terms of tracing animation - but of course the geometry will be wrong without TNR comp.
Section of program below - Z0 is at the parting plane.
Thanks for any ideas as to where I am going wrong.
Iain.
(INTERNAL CHAMFER)
T170717
G96 M03 S30
G00 X45.0 Z65 M08
G00 X45.0 Z0
G01 X50.5 Z0 F.05
G00 X45.0 Z0
G00 X45.0 Z2
G41
G01 X47.5 Z1 F1
G02 X49.5 Z0 I1 F.05
G00 X40 G40 I-5
G00 Z100
Similar Threads:
hi, pls share tool geometry, drawing before and after the operation / i will give you code
ps : i know, Z0 at left of the part
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
Hi Deadly Kitten,
Thanks for your offer to help (Again :-) )
Ive attached a drawing of the rad I want to machine, breaking the internal corner before parting off.
The tool is a 4mm grooving tool with 0.4mm radius. Obviously calling the RHS edge of the tool as operator looks at it.
Code I am using is in the earlier post.
Regards, Iain.
hi gibsoni there is a problem with rad comp toolpaths that begin or end with an arch
there are 2 codes in this post :
... 1st code uses radius comp
... 2nd code uses only coordinates
*it took me few seconds to create the 2nd code, and i spent some time debuging the 1st code
about the 1st code :
... normally, the line " Z1 " should not be there, but is critical to be there
... also " G01 X0 G91 " is a trick that should not be there
... it should work without the imaginary vector, but i couldn't make it work without it
* the code works, but is a tiny mess
long live Okuma / kindly
ps : speed is changed from 30 to 250 M/min; i don't have all day also, it may be too much effort to cut with that big insert at the interior; maybe you should consider an insert of only 3 or 2.5 mm ? 4 seems big ...
Code:G50 S2000 G00 X500 Z200 T+01*10101 ( w4r0.4p1 ) M61 G96 M03 S250 M08 G00 X45 Z65 Z0 G01 X50.9 F0.05 G95 ( 47.5+2*1+2*nose_radius+0.6_clearance ) X-0.4 G91 G00 X45 G90 Z1 G01 X47.5 G41 K1 ( imaginary vector for positioning among a tangent at angle 0 ) G02 X49.5 Z0 I1 G01 X0 G91 G40 G90 G00 X45 Z100 M02
Code:G50 S2000 G00 X500 Z200 T+01*101 ( w4r0.4 ) M61 G96 M03 S250 M08 G00 X45 Z65 Z0 G01 X50.9 F0.05 G95 ( 47.5+2*1+2*nose_radius+0.6_clearance ) X-0.4 G91 G00 X45 G90 G01 X2*23.75 Z1.4 G02 X2*25.15 Z0 I1.4 G00 X45 Z100 M02
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
hello, both codes from previous post work, thus they deliver the part
problem is that they deliver only that part, while another part will require another code
... and this is where parametric codes kick in
only for this type of operation, pls find in attached image, 3 kind of toolpaths :
... right : clearance groove + radius
... middle : clearance groove + radius approach + radius ( this code will smooth out the entrance of the tool )
... left : clearance groove + chamfer + radius approach + radius ( this code will smooth out the entrance of the tool and will reduce cutting effort when cutting the radius )
same operation can be coded anywhere between " speed " and " longer tool life & reduce cutting effort "
each type of toolpath requires a different execution time and has different stability
if you wish to increase specs, then you need to start with a stable smooth toolpath, so to eliminate sudden effort peaks that may stress the cutting edge
next code is a parametric approach for the "right" image / kindly
Code:G50 S2000 M61 ( back internal radius / etc ) NOEX V1 = 47.5 ( id ) NOEX V2 = 1 ( radius ) NOEX V3 = 0.4 ( nose radius ) NOEX V4 = V1-3 ( id clearance ) NOEX V5 = 70 ( Z clearance ) ( * ) G00 X500 Z200 T + tool_post * 101 ( w?r? ) G96 S M42 M03 M08 G00 X+V4 Z+V5 Z0 G01 X+V1+2*[V2+V3+0.3] F G95 X-0.4 G91 G00 X+V4 G90 G01 X+V1 Z+V2+V3 G02 X+V1+2*[V2+V3] Z0 I+V2+V3 G00 X+V4 Z+V5 M02
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
one more thing : you have declared P1 for that tool; why ?
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
hello there is a trick to handle this; i discovered it today, by checking a program created by someone else, for attached toolpath ( dimensions does not matter )
it works, but i don't understand why the controller hits a wall when it must deal with comp and arches at toolpath end, and i don't understand the solution ?! kindly
Code:G00 XA ZA G42 G01 XB ZB G03 XC ZC L G01 G40 ( if G01 is removed, code will fail )
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
Cancel of TNRC isn't possible when circular interpolation (G2 or G3) on OSP controller.
Maybe it is same on RS274NGC too.
https://www.facebook.com/okuma.tuning
hi kurmay, i was told that that code was generated by igf
i asked because that particular solution could not have been generated by any cam post
in other words, okuma guys are aware of this, and they solve it by g01 g40 combo ( without using coordinates )
inside the manuals, there is no block that contains only those 2 codes
problem & solution, are both weird; i don't believe i would have guessed it / kindly
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...