Mechanical Couplings Difference


Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Mechanical Couplings Difference

  1. #1
    Member kolias's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1332
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Mechanical Couplings Difference

    Don’t know if this is the right place to discuss couplings but I wonder is there a difference in using either of the ones shown in the attached picture and why?

    I have always used the type A to connect a stepper motor to a ball screw shaft on a typical 3 axis cnc and never had a problem but perhaps type B would be a better choice?

    Thanks

    Similar Threads:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Mechanical Couplings Difference-couplings-jpg  
    Nicolas


  2. #2
    Community Moderator Jim Dawson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    5717
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Mechanical Couplings Difference

    I have never liked type A for transmitting much torque. They work great for driving encoders. It's a spring and thus would have some ''windup''. Also I don't like keyways and setscrews for couplings.

    Type B will transmit a lot of torque, and also is easy to disassemble when needed. The full around clamping action of the coupling on the shaft is more robust than a keyway and a setscrew.

    Jim Dawson
    Sandy, Oregon, USA


  3. #3
    Member kolias's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1332
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Mechanical Couplings Difference

    Many thanks for the education Jim, it makes sense and I will switch to type B.

    Nicolas


  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4371
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Mechanical Couplings Difference

    Hi,
    I used A type on my original mini-mill. As Jim mentioned I did note a little 'lost motion' in the coupling as it would twist under load. The lost motion
    amounted to 4um and that compares to the natural resolution of 1um. I often considered replacing them, although really 4um is pretty damn good and probably
    better than the over-all accuracy of my machine.

    THEN....I had a crash. The steppers are coupled to 10:1 low lash planetary gearboxes and have a lot of torque, about 25Nm at a crash stall. I found that the type A coupling just shore
    off. I was very pleased, I was going to badly break or damage something and yet the coupling broke, cheaply and easily replaced. I came to realise that its like a mechanical 'fuse'.
    I decided to keep the type A couplers so that I did have a 'fuse' and would accept the minor loss of resolution. I used that machine for seven years and produced a mountain of good work
    with it.

    My new mill is much bigger and more powerful with servos direct coupled to the ballscrews. I could not tolerate the lost motion of the type A couplers but used twin disc couplings,
    they were pretty cheap, $60 for three of them. They have a 20mm nominal bore shaft size, and they work well. They will not shear off if I crash though......I haven't yet, 18 months and counting!

    Craig

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Mechanical Couplings Difference-disccouplings-png  


  5. #5
    Member kolias's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1332
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Mechanical Couplings Difference

    Thanks Craig, very inetersting

    Nicolas


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum for manufacturing industry. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on


Our Brands

Mechanical Couplings Difference

Mechanical Couplings Difference