I would suggest what I suggested in the very first post of this thread and multiple times since. Nate needs to stress relieve and machine these frames.
I'm not suggesting that the FLA is not a good machine. I'm suggesting that it can be a lot better with a fairly minimal change in the way it's made. Stress relieving and machining are the industry standard. Shimming, adjusting mechanisms, etc. are not. They're workarounds for a problem that should not exist. As Gerry said, it might add $500 to the cost, but had it been done, this and other threads complaining about the machine not being within tolerances would most likely never have been made. Bill, there's room for improvement, that's all I'm suggesting.
I can't speak for Gerry, but I'm pretty sure I understand where he's coming from in saying Camaster is 2nd tier. That's a compliment considering its price. He's comparing a Kia to a Range Rover. Both good vehicles. First tier machines are designed and built to be run day in day out under heavy loads. MultiCam builds a machine that rapid traverses at over 11,000 (ELEVEN THOUSAND!) inches per minute and reaches cut speeds of 7,800 inches per minute. Don't try that on a Camaster.