Anybody else out there think this is worthwhile or is it just me? There may be a number of users who are not experienced with the industrial controllers and do not fully understand the benefits of this type of toolpath smoothing. But I think it makes a lot of sense and there must be some value to it as all the big guys like Fanuc, Mazak, Haas, etc are using it.
Im not too sure on the details of implementing it. But the transform method we tried did seem to work very well. Did exactly what I wanted and what I was used to seeing on other controllers. Only thing different id like to see different is have it proportional to time or feedrate instead of a fixed amount of smoothing. As i mentioned before it don't make sense to apply large amounts of smoothing when feeding slowly when the machine can easily follow the exact path very closely anyway. And its great to just program a slower feedrate to ensure a critical feature gets machined as close as possible.