So Am I. Tool load monitoring worked on the machine Doosan replaced with this less advanced current one. Either Doosan will fix it, or people will just know that they are going to start moving backwards with future release machines. Everything on the specification list should work. The machine should be tested and debugged before sale. Stuff like thermal compensation where one of the temp sensors monitors outside casting air temperature and responds to air currents that have nothing to do with the casting temperature, need to be addressed.
Without fixing the thermal comp, there is no good excuse for moving to the I series control and breaking tool load monitoring in the first place. We've had to shut that feature off in the September 2020 TT1800SY II and in one of the 2020 Puma 2100SY II's. It's flawed. It's embarrassing, and customers shouldn't be paying for porked up component build outs, just to be forced to shut off spec features on the floor for lack of function. - If the one sensor hangs the whole system they should expedite a sheet metal or plastic box to keep the air current off the one sensor so the whole system doesn't have to be shut off to get the machine to stop jumping around in diameter. The problem isn't having a problem. It's denying the problem and refusing to fix it. That goes to lack of pride / lack of dedication to customers, lack of commitment to excellence. Between tool failures for jumping around in X during bores and drilling ops, and TLM issues, we had to double staff on second shift. It's more expensive to run the machines now. When tools start breaking and machines need extra attention guys get strung out and the operation can't stop, so when our employee feedback is negative we have to add redundant staffing to prepare for and try to prevent contingencies.
By the way, we also have Doosan mills with tool setters that work great. We set the entire magazine to the setter, probe the parts and the parts get cut accurately without blend issues, and probes fault themselves if the parts aren't loaded right. Without a tool setter and probe, everyone would have to be a toolmaker to run good parts. The primary issue with needing toolmakers (in lieu of technology) to run good parts is 90% of those guys sit down at an operation or settup interview and attempt to change the position to job estimator or foreman, or some really cake desk pilot job, wasting everyone's time in the interview. AKA they don't want to actually make the process run, so it doesn't matter if they could theoretically do the work and stand in for the technology, because they will refuse to do the work. The technology rather, compensates for prima donnas without work ethic by allowing industry to operate with guys that actually work for a living. Someone smart in the background sets up the process, but he's at a desk so he's willing to do that job. The one smart guy keeps you from needing to have 40 interviews with toolmakers to find 4 that want to settup and run machines which is what toolmakers are supposed to be good at and intended for.