Originally Posted by
tobystewart
Further to my last, all of the positive comments on this thread were registered with an email address.
A court order for discovery would allow those users to be contacted, to verify their authenticity.
If it could be proven that such users were not authentic, it follows that the comments were made dishonestly, for the purpose of perpetuating a series of frauds.
I hope Kevin reads this, and can see where it is going.
It is one thing to tell lies and take money from the safety of your office. Accounting for it in front of a judge in session, in the face of hostile and competent cross examination, is an entirely different proposition.