Flood Cooling vs. Fog Buster - Page 2


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Flood Cooling vs. Fog Buster

  1. #21
    Member Karl_T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Dassel.MN
    Posts
    1543
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I see the 0.040" nozzle diamter posted form my first attempt on the fogbuster. My second unit used 0.049" and worked just as well.

    Much later, my line got cuaght in swarf and pulled of right to the mixing chamber. It made a good spitter with no line and I finished the job that way.

    Anyway, the 0.040" dimension came from the patent and looks to not be that critical. I'd urge just using a mig tip if you build your own. Make a spare while you're at it. I've jerked the end of it at least three times.

    Karl



  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    242
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Must be nice........

    Single head $310
    double Head $400 bucks, wow. Well what ever the market will bear.

    They are proud of them things aren't they. Looks like a trip to the McMaster-Carr for about $20 in parts and an hour or so.

    Smitty



  3. #23
    Member Steve Seebold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    USA and proud of it
    Posts
    1863
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Flood Cooling vs. Fog Buster

    In my experience, if you’re profiling or surfacing, the Fog Buster is hard to beat.

    They don’t work that great for drilling, reaming, tapping or pocketing.



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum for manufacturing industry. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on


Our Brands

Flood Cooling vs. Fog Buster

Flood Cooling vs. Fog Buster