Australia Force on the ball/lead screw - Page 2


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: Force on the ball/lead screw

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4363
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Hi,

    I think I'll use this machine as is for a little longer and see how I feel about it after a few months.
    Good idea.

    Nine or ten years ago when I first started with a parallel port and Mach3 I spent a lot of time any money trying to get my spindle speeds accurate, and in both directions.
    What good did it do me.....no bloody good at all. As it turns out in 99.9% of cases if the spindle speed is within 10-20%, that's good enough. Do you have any lefthand tools?
    I don't so why did I bother?

    What I did was use my first machine for seven years with a few well chosen upgrades, but largely unchanged from my original design. I did however develop a list of area/items that
    I intended to improve upon markedly in a new design:
    1) Rigidity
    2) Rigidity
    3) Just in case I forgot to mention it.....Rigidity
    4) Speed/Acceleration
    5) Spindle torque for steel and stainless
    6) Way covers to keep the ss...tt out of the really expensive bits (ballscrews)
    7) Flood cooling, volume, pressure, filtration, chip handling and a machine surround that does not ff....gg leak!!
    8) 4th axis

    Over a period of time you work out what is important to you and the parts you make, and that should direct your critical thinking, otherwise you can waste a lot of time and money
    on things that are nice to have but don't materially improve your parts at all.

    Craig



  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4363
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Hi,

    How does one test rigidity? If that is the factor that determines what motors/electronics then there must be a way of gauging how stiff = what motors...?
    To measure rigidity, at least using terminology and techniques applicable to CNC machines, requires that you apply a force, usually at the nose of the spindle relative
    to the table. You would apply say a 10kg force, or 100N, and measure the deflection. You would probably do this is in the X direction, Y direction and Z direction.

    This is a subset of the general process of measuring the 'stress tensor'. A tensor is a matrix of numbers representing the compliance of the controlled point at any given location
    within the machining envelope of the machine. Note that 'compliance' is the exact opposite or reciprocal of stiffness or rigidity. Compliance has the units of Force per unit Distance.
    The stress tensor is a 3 x 3 matrix. The leading diagonal of the matrix is the three measurements I have described above, namely the compliance in the three axis directions. The remaining
    six numbers of the tensor represent the rotational deflection when a torque is applied, say torque on the X axis causes a rotational deflection along the Y axis.

    Generally speaking if a torque in the X direction causes a deflection in the Y direction then the reverse applies, a torque in the Y direction cause an equal deflection in the X direction.
    Thus of the six numbers that we seek to populate the stress tensor there will be three pairs of identical numbers. The arrangement of those numbers in the matrix is called
    'symmetrical' and has a very important property that allows a huge simplification in the mathematics to find Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors of the matrix which in turn can be used
    to determine the motion of the system described by the stress tensor.

    All this talk of tensors, Eigen functions and stuff like that make my A-hole pucker and I come out in a cold sweat....and that's 40 years after first learning about them....rue the day!
    Fortunately computers have come to our salvation and this sort of thing is handled by Finite Element Anlaysis programs these days, and a huge boon to the engineering community
    it has been. I would commend you look at the FEA module of Fusion , free download to hobbyists, to see the power that it brings to a designer.


    More importantly than the complexities of stress tensors etc is that there is a very useful and simple grain of truth to the process that will inform you as to the basic properties of the machine.
    In CNC machines its common to see 'stiffness' quoted as 150 N/um. Observing the units the number quoted is the compliance rather than stiffness....but none the less conveys useful meaning
    to any engineer, ie if you push 15kg force (weight of 1 1/2 slabs of beer) then the machine will deflect 1um (half an ants dick). Note that it's not common to specify the deflection of an axis when a force is applied
    along a different axis, ie the 'cross terms' of the stress tensor as they tend to cloud the essential and simple understanding.

    Now the question is what numbers should you be looking at.

    For instance a moderate size commercial VMC , say $100,00 to $200,000, may well have stiffness of 150N/um.
    A huge fixed gantry machining centre, say 3,000,000 , may well have a stiffness of 750N/um

    That's all very well for large and expensive machines, but what can we expect or hobbyist level machines?. As an example you may bee familiar with the RongFu or Precision Matthews
    type drill mills. They tend to be cast iron dovetail beds with a steel column, typically a 2hp spindle, and maybe $2000USD. Having used them they are very useful, nothing like
    the rigidity of a bigger mill, but rigid enough that when used with care can do a good job in aluminum and steel. They have a stiffness of around 20N/um. This would be a good goal
    for you to aim at if you want a metal capable hobbyist machine.

    Peteeng has a very long running thread about a composite mill design trying to achieve stiffness of 20N/um in all axes in a benchtop footprint and weighing 500kg. Its well worth a read....
    although its a long thread!

    Really its not about ' a certain stiffness = a certain size motor', but rather 'how stiff does my machine need to be to make these parts from that material?'. Thereafter the question changes to 'what
    is a good motor/ballscrew combination to maximize the use of the machine of this given stiffness?'.

    The best way to answer those questions is get out into the workshop and start making parts on the machine you have. That experience will tell you what the limitations are....and inform your
    choice of your upgrade path or new machine.

    Craig



  3. #23
    Member peteeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    dum dum
    Posts
    6324
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Hi PinkP - Here's an astm std for this. Small tabletop manual mills can be as low as 2N/um at the collet. The english CNC forum has a few tests published on members machines with good numbers.

    A manual mill can be more compliant than a cnc machine. For instance people say I can "route" aluminium with my trimmer why can't a little CNC do it? Thats because your hands are damp, you don't plunge and do100% wide cuts etc etc. So small mills are around 50-100N/um and good commercial VMC are around 150N/um and then specialist machines are even stiffer. If your CAD system has FEA use the ASTM as a guide to model for rigidity. Unfortunately, the ASTM does not spec what a good/bad machine is, it only is a report on the tested machine.... but at least it gives people a std way to rest for rigidity. Welcome to the biggest rabbit hole in CNC machine design, don't pick the middle of the mushroom... you really don't know where you may end up... Peter

    My advice is take advantage of geometry, make everything as big as possible within the available possible part envelope (it's called the package size sometimes ie make the package as big as poss) Don't try to guess what vibration may occur. If you have FEA then a modal analysis can be done. This is easier then a stress analysis. If your designing a gantry type machine start at the Z axis vs the table size. make it as stiff and big as possible. Then work outward to the envelope. If you start with the table and work towards the z axis you always run out of geometry and the Z axis will always be under cooked. The z axis is the first thing that will tell you it's not stiff enough when you start using the machine so make it UBER UBER stiff. Don't make the machine over size in the thought that once a year you may make something big. Make the machine small that will do 99% of what you want to do., The smaller the machine the stiffer it can be if you think big... Look at commercial machines as a reference and try to understand why they are so big... Good Luck and happy Making. Peter

    I'd like to add that the static stiffness of a machine is an indication of its performance and is not a definitive metric. There's lots of research and info on dynamic stiffness which is trying to better define a metric for machine performance. But measuring forces and deflection real time is a bit difficult. Dynamic stiffness includes the damping of the structure so is a better metric for how good the machine will cut if it can be measured easily. So make the machine as stiff as possible. if you measure your current machine stiffness that gives you a line in the sand.... publish the result if you do, it will be interesting. I'm working towards testing mine so I can compare it to my FE model. But work, life etc keeps pushing that project out into the horizon.

    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by peteeng; 09-09-2022 at 09:07 PM.


  4. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Quote Originally Posted by joeavaerage View Post
    ie if you push 15kg force (weight of 1 1/2 slabs of beer)
    Lol, I'm going to try remember that unit of measurement and use it

    The "tensor and Eigen" speak is a little above my pay grade but everything else you said is very helpful. I do have a goal in mind. I want to shape/contour aluminium on a 4th axis e.g. chess pieces.

    Quote Originally Posted by peteeng View Post
    Welcome to the biggest rabbit hole in CNC machine design, don't pick the middle of the mushroom... you really don't know where you may end up... Peter
    I know i'm at the steep end of the learning curve but it certainly seems like i could get lost in this rabbit hole. Focus on my goal

    Quote Originally Posted by peteeng View Post
    My advice is take advantage of geometry, make everything as big as possible within the available possible part envelope (it's called the package size sometimes ie make the package as big as poss) Don't try to guess what vibration may occur. If you have FEA then a modal analysis can be done. This is easier then a stress analysis. If your designing a gantry type machine start at the Z axis vs the table size. make it as stiff and big as possible. Then work outward to the envelope. If you start with the table and work towards the z axis you always run out of geometry and the Z axis will always be under cooked. The z axis is the first thing that will tell you it's not stiff enough when you start using the machine so make it UBER UBER stiff. Don't make the machine over size in the thought that once a year you may make something big. Make the machine small that will do 99% of what you want to do., The smaller the machine the stiffer it can be if you think big... Look at commercial machines as a reference and try to understand why they are so big... Good Luck and happy Making. Peter
    I read somewhere that it's not 100% necessary to have a machining background to get into cnc but i have since learned that a machinist will have a better idea of a given machines weak points as well as machining processes/geometry and can somewhat reduce vibration / heat / tool wear etc... I don't have that experience so i went and bought a "cheap chinese so and so" fully expecting to modify it to bring up to my expectations. It seemed like the best option in my head. Rather than building from scratch without any experience "or" buying something pricy and crashing it due to inexperience.

    Oh and small is my preference. I know that works better for rigidity but I don't want or need a large machine. Maybe i'll post some pics when i get it all back together... that could be months away as you are fully aware

    Thanks for the guidance



  5. #25
    Member peteeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    dum dum
    Posts
    6324
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Hi PinkP- if your doing thigs like chess pieces perhaps a cnc lathe with a mill head is a better configuration then a Mill/router? with a rotary. Keep us in the loop there's enough depth in the forum to get you to a happy place. Peter



  6. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    This weekend i got to run this little cnc again after some modifications. Sorry i'm not in the league of the vast majority of this forum (i'm a new to the industry and a hobbyist at that).

    This is the machine I bought -
    DIY-Mini-CNC-3020-Router-5-Axis-4-Axis-3-Axis-500W-USB-Port-for-Wood.jpg_640x640.jpg

    Test cuts this weekend after some modifications - I forgot to mention in the video i'm using a 6mm end mill (the largest bit i'm likely to use)...




  7. #27
    Member peteeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    dum dum
    Posts
    6324
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Hi PinkP - what is the spindle rpm? Peter



  8. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Doh! Good question. I didn't pay attention on the first run (maybe 2) but after that I went the Max available for this spindle which is 12k



  9. #29
    Member peteeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    dum dum
    Posts
    6324
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Hi PinkP - Your feed to rpm ratio is way off. You are rubbing the material vs cutting it. Plus you are recutting the swarf. Notice the ribbon swarf being created and being pushed around. The feed, number of cutting edges and rpm are related to the feed/mm . The tool needs a decent cut width to cut. If the chip load is too light the edge just slides across, if the chip load is too thick the tool will stall. Heres the equation. If you pick a chip load of 0.18 to 0.2mm with a 6mm 2F tool you need at least 4350mm/min feed to achieve clean cuts. All your feed speeds are too slow so you are rubbing not cutting. The depth of cut (DOC) is related to the power available. 1mm doc needs 1X kW 2mm needs 2X kW. So speed up the feed!! and slow down the rpm top say 6000rpm if you can.

    feed = 6000x2x0.18= 2160mm/min maybe a better spot. Get some 1 flute tools this helps with the high speed spindles...

    feed = 12000x1x0.18=12000*.18=2160mm/min

    machine stiffness always helps but sort your chip load.... the tool supplier often has its nominal chip load called Fz in their tool specs

    cheers Peter

    https://cimquest-inc.com/what-is-chip-load/

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Force on the ball/lead screw-chip-load-jpg  


  10. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4363
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Hi,
    the initial flexure measurements you pictured are normal for these sorts of machines. The result of the lack of rigidity are seen later
    in the cuts in aluminum.

    The bottom line is that these machines cannot cut aluminum, they are just not rigid enough. Had you performed the same cuts but with wood
    or plastic the results would have been much much better....but aluminum....no. To do a reasonable job in aluminum you'd need a rigidity at least
    ten times what you have currently........and with the best will in the world you'll never achieve it with this design and construction. No amount of beefing
    or replacing the spindle will increase the rigidity by ten times.

    The better use for this machine is to use it with materials which are within it's capacity, and have lots of fun making parts and learning CNC.

    If you want to make aluminum or brass parts then either get a much more rigid machine or make one. If you want to cut steel the machine then it will have to
    be at least another ten times more rigid.

    Making metal parts requires ultra rigid machines, and they are very expensive.

    Craig



  11. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    I'll try remember those rules of thumb... and nominal chip load (Fz) I didn't know what that meant or that there was a recommended by the tool maker.

    The chip load you mention seems very high. I'm not doubting you, i can see that I'm rubbing the tool (now i know what the ribbon peeling off the side means). I put it through the speed/feed app and to get to that chip load the overrides are at extremes...

    https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw...-no?authuser=2

    I just want to clarify the spindle power you mentioned - 1mm doc = 1kw etc... I assume that is referencing those spindles that spin up to 20 or 24k rpm? Is there a way to guestimate torque or power of those motors when it's only running at 6k rpm ? Not that this matters much in my situation, I'm leaning towards fitting my outrunner spindle to the machine for jobs that require lots of material removed. I'll just use smaller bits on the smaller (higher revving motor). Revs on the outrunner top out at 5k with a truck load of torque.



    I need more time to play around with my machine and learn how to use it ????

    Thanks for your input Joe. Good to know I'm pushing **** uphill. I was planning on one more brace before giving up on rigidity



  12. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4256
    Downloads
    4
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    I have a very good solution to the speed problem - even though I am running fairly powerful DC servos with good encoders.
    It is called an armchair.

    Cheers
    Roger



  13. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Quote Originally Posted by RCaffin View Post
    I have a very good solution to the speed problem - even though I am running fairly powerful DC servos with good encoders.
    It is called an armchair.

    Cheers
    Roger
    Yeh, i know. This forum doesn't rate hobbyist... or is it hobby machines... or is it both

    I did some work on rigidity. It's better though i reckon i can still tweak it just a little more. While doing these test cuts i discovered i need to go into mach3 and tune the steppers to go faster than 1000mm/min. I had meant to run the feed at 1600mm/min so in the second run i just slowed the rpm (and took a lesser doc).





  14. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Some more video. This has also been a learning experience for me





  15. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4363
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Hi,
    machine flexure of any description from any source degrades accuracy and surface finish.

    Craig



  16. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Yes, and knowing where the flex is coming from is the key. Seeing that bit of slowmo helps



  17. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4363
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Hi,
    from the video you posted showing the machine deflection when you placed a force on the spindle nose....the whole machine is flexing, not just the spindle.

    Craig



  18. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    Yeh, there was a ton of movement in that direction (tilting of the gantry) so I didn't bother to check the sideways (x axis) deflection.



  19. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: Force on the ball/lead screw

    I'm starting to realise now how irrelevant my initial question was. I'm actually at a stage where I can start making stuff. Still just on my L plates but I reckon I can improve the finish and lessen machining time by choosing better tool paths, cutting bits etc...





Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum for manufacturing industry. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on


Our Brands

Force on the ball/lead screw

Force on the ball/lead screw