Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Concerning the Drive Box

  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    20
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Concerning the Drive Box

    I was looking into Xylotex 4-axis drive box. It is rated at 30V and 2.5amps/phase. The steppers that come with the kit are rated at 2.8amp/phase. Im just curious if those stepper would be dangerous to the kit, since they seem to draw more current than what the drive box is rated at. Also, would 296oz/in motors be sufficient if planning to occasionally mill aluminum.

    I was also considering the PicoCNC control box, it has pretty much the same specs but is slightly cheaper. Thanks for any input.


  2. #2
    Community Moderator ger21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Shelby Twp, MI....USA
    Posts
    22,286
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    The drives determine the current they supply, not the motors. The Xylotex can only supply 2.5A to the motors, which will result in a roughly 10% loss of the motors rated torque.

    As for the motors being sufficient, there are many more factors involved than just what you are cutting. Each machine has different requirements, so it's hard to say.
    You said 296, but did you mean the 269 oz motors from Xylotex? Those are about the biggest motors you can use with a Xylotex and still get decent performance. You can get similar ones for a little less from Automation Direct. http://web1.automationdirect.com/adc.../STP-MTR-23079
    Gerry

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)


Posting Permissions


 


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on

Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.