![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| WoodWorking Discuss wood working techniques and tips here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I have been drawing some parts in cad and wondering if they are cutable on a DIY machine. I am posting a DXF of the file. This is a 15 inch 120 tooth gear. If anyone could cut this and post a pic of the result I would greatly appreciate it. This is for a clock that I am designing. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| The tips of the teeth don't touch the sides. zoom in really close and you can see it.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
This must be due to some kind of limitation in solidworks. I tend to notice that when zoomed really close in you can see the gaps but yet the part will still render without errors. Should still be cutable I am guessing. I am using an involute curve that is made from 15 small lines so I am sure that is part of the problem. I cant use regular arcs to form this type of curve it has to be made from lines. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Hi, the tips of the gears DO touch the sides. I found no such gaps nor did I have any problem machining it as you can plainly see in the Video I posted above. Here is a Solidworks rendering of the very same DXF file you posted. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Sorry Mike, but they don't. They're very, very close, but after a couple zooms in AutoCAD, you can see the gaps. I was trying to join them together in AutoCAD, and it wouldn't let me. That's how I found out there were gaps.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Ger21, He went from Solidworks to DXF. Then I went back into Solidworks, Mastercam, Catia, Cimatron, UGS NX, Pro/E and found no gaps no matter how far I zoomed in. If there were gaps I would not have been able to create the water tight solid that I did in each one of these systems. What version of Acad do you have? There are DXF options for export from Solidworks. Maybe they weren't set right for your version of Acad is all I can think of. Can you post a screen shot of one of these gaps? Last edited by Mike Stevenson; 07-03-2008 at 10:14 PM. Reason: wanted to add an attachment but could not |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| The gap is .0000002. I'm using AutoCAD 2007, but it doesn't matter. The coordinates in the .dxf are specified to 10 decimal places. And there are .0000002 gaps. The horizontal line in the image is the top of the tooth, btw.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| I had assumed it was drawn with a 2D CAD program, and was just pointing out the errors. I didn't know how big the gap was until a few minutes ago.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Just a test | CNCRob | Test Forum | 0 | 06-03-2006 05:54 PM |
| test | garagefela | Test Forum | 0 | 05-24-2006 02:37 AM |
| Test | Switcher | Test Forum | 0 | 05-09-2006 10:02 AM |
| Test | WarrenW | Test Forum | 1 | 02-24-2006 04:32 PM |
| test | CNCadmin | Test Forum | 0 | 09-26-2004 10:51 PM |