CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > CAM Software > TurboCAD/CAM


TurboCAD/CAM Discuss TurboCAD/CAM software here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 09-22-2007, 08:34 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 59
Larry Myers is on a distinguished road
What is 21/2 d?

Hi ALl,

I am new here, new to G code, just bought a new VMC and Turbocad 12 Pro with cadcam plugin. Can someone tell me what 2.5 d is comparired to 3d? Thanks

Larry
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 09-22-2007, 11:57 AM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,823
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road
Its a special cnc that scales everything in the Z axis to 1/2 of full size

Not really

Theoretically, a 2.5d cam is incapable of generating a ramping move that could have unique endpoints in all 3 axis. It could produce XY moves, followed by Z moves, all movements being produced by motors on the machine. If you imagine drilling holes with a manually operated quill, on a cnc that only positioned the table in X and Y, that would be 2d. Add a motor to the Z axis to pull the quill for you, you've got a .5d capability.

This definition may be too limited now, because modern cnc's are much more capable. 3 axis interpolation is easy to come by on the machine controller. So perhaps a more modern version of 2.5d would be cam software that can read only wireframe geometry information versus software that can create toolpaths from electronically modelled 3d surfaces.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 09-22-2007, 01:59 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 59
Larry Myers is on a distinguished road
what is 2.5D?

Hi Huflungdung,

Thank you for your response. One reason I ask is because I am at the beginning of a steep learning curve. Here’s my situation:

Just bought a new Sharp 2412 w/Fanuc Oi controller. I am just now learning G Code. I also just bought TurboCad12 Pro with the Cad cam plug-in.
Although I have used Turbocad 6 pro and 8, I am just beginning to learn 12. I am very comfortable with 6.

I have BobCad20 as well however from what I have seen on the tutorial, I doubt that I’ll like it. I do not know Bobcad 20 at all.

I am trying to figure out which I want to learn. I was a little apprehensive about this 2.5D issue. I really do not want to invest the time in learning Turbocad if it’s going to limit my capabilities down the road.
Any thoughts would be very appreciated!

Thanks again!!!!
Larry
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 09-22-2007, 03:33 PM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,823
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road
What kind of part machining do you anticipate doing?

If the parts are drilling and tapping, or machining basic profiles, and simple pockets, a 2.5d cam software can get you quite some distance. However, there may be some wasted effort in learning that if you have the odd 3d surface thrown into the mix.

Bobcad 20 has nothing like an nc process manager to facilitate breaking your part program down into manageable chunks, when editing the program. The need for this will become apparent after you get more into machining.

I'd recommend that you look at a few more demo softwares, if for no other reason than to get a taste for the 'way its done' in pricier systems. I use OneCNC myself, they now have a demo that you can get. The cheaper versions of OneCNC are 2.5d as well, but you'll still get the idea of what an nc manager does. A lot of work that is done with a program like OneCNC in many job shops will rely heavily on the 2.5d (stock toolpaths) anyway, so if you learn the beginner versions, then advance later to the 3d stuff, its not like time wasted in learning, because the 3d (Surface Machining Technology) toolpaths are practically automatic anyway. That's how I got going in OneCNC as a matter of fact, producing 3d molds that Bobcad 18 couldn't touch, and doing it with a few mouse clicks. Mind you that was my first exposure to a more powerful (and modern) cam system, so it blew me away. And that was 3 versions ago.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 09-23-2007, 04:01 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hamilton,Oh
Posts: 325
bborb is on a distinguished road
Hi Larry,
You own some very powerful software and its good you're familiar with TurboCad already. Your CAM plug-in has a type of operations manager in that you can View & Edit by Tool, Operation or Part; reorder by Tool, Operation or Part.
I've used Turbocad Professional and BobCad together to generate toolpaths in G-code extensively in 2-1/2d or 3d. I think you'll find the plug-in in TurbCad most useful, utilizing BobCad more when you get into 3d work. I use the DXF import feature most in BobCad for 3d work, but unless you're going to be making artwork exclusively, learn the 2-1/2d process first and make some money while building a strong understanding of CAM and G-code.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2008, 10:34 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2
danil is on a distinguished road
Hello guys,
This question is to bborb; what versions are you using of Bobcad and TurboCad. I too am just starting out on g-code and cam but have been drawing for several years and can draw most things in either inventor or autocad. I need to generate g-code for a haas gr408. I will have basic shapes to route out and some logo works that I'll be scanning from and generating toolpath. Seems like both have features to address these needs.
Thanks, Danil
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353