CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking Machines > Tormach PCNC


Tormach PCNC Discuss Tormach PCNC machines here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 02-20-2009, 12:47 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: us
Posts: 18
thum31 is on a distinguished road
304 SS @ 24 IPM

I found an article on high speed machining yesterday. I changed one of my programs using the formulas recommended and WOW. Cut cycle time from 38 minutes to 8 1/2.
Using a 4 fl 1/4 carbide tiAln I set it up to cut a depth of .625 at 1750rpm at 18.375 ipm. once the part started I had a little squeal so I bumped up the feed to 24ipm.
I will add a link to the article if I can find it. It is really worth the read.

http://www.cuttingtoolengineering.co...12-Milling.pdf

Last edited by thum31; 02-20-2009 at 02:01 PM. Reason: added link
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 02-20-2009, 04:28 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 91
thackman is on a distinguished road

Are your running dry, flood, or mist? What was the width of the cut: 100% (slotting) or 50%, 30% ,25%, etc (profiling)?
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 02-20-2009, 04:53 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: us
Posts: 18
thum31 is on a distinguished road

It was an internal pocket spiraling outward from the center, and an external contour. Food, at .012 woc. I followed the calculations in the article pretty close then made a few adjustments. The article said to take the required DOC and divide by 2.5 to get the end mill size. .625/2.5=.25. then take your normal clpt and multiply by 3.5 and calc the speed and feed with that number. I use .00075 normally times 3.5=.02625*4*1750=18.375

I picked 1750 for the rpm thinking that pully would provide more torque.

This is supposed to keep the chip size the same (.00075) but now it is .625 tall. the writer was looking at using the full cutting edge of the given tool.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 02-20-2009, 05:46 PM
BobWarfield's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,340
BobWarfield is on a distinguished road

Great article, thanks for the link.

Best,

BW
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 02-22-2009, 04:11 AM
zephyr9900's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 927
zephyr9900 is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by thum31
It was an internal pocket spiraling outward from the center,
How did you start the pocket, thum31? Did you drill or plunge a pilot hole or just ramp the cutter down? If the latter, it seems like the cutter would have a big chip load for a while because you're effectively slotting at the start. Was it regular spiral pocketing or does your CAM do the trochoidal thing (which I'd love to try someday but SheetCam doesn't do that...)?

Thanks,

Randy
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 02-22-2009, 02:49 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 332
keithorr is on a distinguished road

Thank you for the link. I'm looking forward to trying the numbers on the next appropriate job.

The last lines of the article read:

"Steele said he is somewhat reluctant to use the term
“breakthrough,” but feels “we are pretty close to redefining
the way people ought to be machining. In our battle with
offshore competition, we have to be smarter. Automation
and techniques like this are going to help us win.” "

Win what? What's to prevent an offshore vendor from buying the tooling, software, machines and doing the same? You think Seco or Iscar will limit who buys their tooling?
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 02-22-2009, 10:10 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: us
Posts: 18
thum31 is on a distinguished road

Randy,
I had a .375 pilot. I fdrilled the part before parting off the material. Regular spiral starting in the center. I had another fo at it today. I ran it with a .122 woc at .600 depth. 32ipm Things were going great till I lost the battle with chip evac. Once that happened the spindle started to slow so I had to abort. If the chip could fall out the bottom I think that it would have been fine.
I am thinking about the new spindle in the future.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 02-23-2009, 12:25 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 26
hawkburger is on a distinguished road

I use the dia. of cutter to set the max amounts for toolpath depth and width.
Usually going for 100% depth x 50% width.; preferably
but for slots it would be vice versa. 50% for depth and 100% for width O.K.?
depth. = 50%of cutter dia. for depth of cut. x 100% for width of cut.
(and vice-versa.)
So for contouring it's 100% of cutter for "depth" x 50%of cutter for "width" of cut.(Preferred)
Slotting : Start a Ramp angle 3deg.(5deg. if you want to max output) "zig-zag" and "criss-cross" down to 1/8 deep. Feed rate 50% of linear feed(5.0 I.P.M.).
'Zig Zag' and 'criss cross' gets to depth with less downward (Plunging) force. and cuts without rubbing the center of tool as much as constant circular ramping.
"As long as the ramp strokes are 200% larger than the tool dia." (1 inch)
This allows for Chip evacuation!!!!!!!
This saves the work hardening of Matl. for further machining ease.
When the ramping is at 50% of tool dia. deep. then linear feed 10.0 I.P.M.
My speed for 302 stainless with tialin Carbide = 165 SFM 1/4 mill tialin
2521 R.P.M.
.004 feed per rev. = 10 inches per minute.
( Small slots ramp-cut with 3-flute flat endmill 50 % Feedrate)
That cuts a .125deep slot 1/4 inch wide 10 inches long in one minute.
If you want high speed machining try using Rounded ball endmills not flat ones for rough milling slots.
My tools cost money and I have plenty of time, just not alot of money.

Last edited by hawkburger; 02-23-2009 at 12:43 AM.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 02-23-2009, 09:03 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 380
sharpshooter90 is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by keithorr View Post
"Steele said he is somewhat reluctant to use the term
“breakthrough,” but feels “we are pretty close to redefining
the way people ought to be machining. In our battle with
offshore competition, we have to be smarter. Automation
and techniques like this are going to help us win.” "

Win what? What's to prevent an offshore vendor from buying the tooling, software, machines and doing the same? You think Seco or Iscar will limit who buys their tooling?
In our present economic situation, i think you will find that there is a plentiful supply of skilled operators willing to work at low wages available here in USA. For highly technical work, often 90% of the expense is in the equipment, so cheap foreign labor is not that big of an advantage. Adding the costs of importing specialized materials and then re-exporting them, offshore companies would not have significant advantage.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 02-11-2010, 08:07 PM
300sniper's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 378
300sniper is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by thum31 View Post
I found an article on high speed machining yesterday. I changed one of my programs using the formulas recommended and WOW. Cut cycle time from 38 minutes to 8 1/2.
Using a 4 fl 1/4 carbide tiAln I set it up to cut a depth of .625 at 1750rpm at 18.375 ipm. once the part started I had a little squeal so I bumped up the feed to 24ipm.
I will add a link to the article if I can find it. It is really worth the read.

http://www.cuttingtoolengineering.co...12-Milling.pdf
i read over that article again and gave this technique a try today.

the material was 1018 cold roll steel. i used a 1/2" tialn four flute carbide endmill at 2254 rpm. a .010" radial doc, 1.000" axial doc and 60 ipm. i ran it dry and it performed extremely well. in the about 40 minutes of machine time, i created quite the pile of chips.

i had access to 3 sides of the part so i cut a slot on the side that had no access. once that was opened up, i climb milled around the profile the full depth with .010" step over. the long chips were flying and creating a few large piles of chips. i was nervous at first but soon found myself impressed watching a 1/2" cutter at 60 ipm in steel.

i didn't shove these chips into these piles, that is just where they landed during the machining.







Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 02-11-2010, 09:14 PM
BobWarfield's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,340
BobWarfield is on a distinguished road

Radial chip thinning is a beautiful thing:



In fact, you have to crank the feeds way up just to get the same effective chip load as with a more normal depth of cut. Failure to do so can leave you cutting a chipload that is less than the radius of your cutter's edge. Suddenly you're rubbing instead of cutting and your tool life will go down in a hurry.

Figuring all of this out automatically is why I originally created my G-Wizard calculator. In fact, this particular cut would need to run at 86 IPM (if you had that much feed) to restore a normal chip load of 0.0014".

Bumping the SFM can be a little dicier unless you really know exactly what your toolpath is doing by way of cutter engagement. If you get it right, you are flying along the way CAM products like Surfcam do. If you get it wrong, you're burning tools. Takes a lot of spindle rpm to get there though.

Meanwhile, it sure is cool to pile up those chips that fast!

Cheers,

BW
__________________
Try G-Wizard Machinist's Calculator for free:
http://www.cnccookbook.com/CCGWizard.html
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 02-23-2010, 05:20 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 438
keen is on a distinguished road

Hi - At those speeds are you not getting stepper coupling 'creep' or even steps loss due to the rapid reversals? I find I start to lose position if the speeds are too high..
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353