CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking Machines > Tormach PCNC


Tormach PCNC Discuss Tormach PCNC machines here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 12-28-2006, 11:30 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 4
sav1234 is on a distinguished road
Question How does Tormach 1100 Accuracy Compare?

I'm seriously considering buying a Tormac 1100 but I need help!

I'm a novice machinist but I am an engineer so I looked through Tormach's posted certificate of inspection carefully.

First of all I congratulate Tormach for posting this online as well as a wealth of other informative material. The problem is that no one else does so I don't have anything to compare it to!

Three things bother me somewhat.

First, the spindle runout spec is .o3 mm at 100mm or 1.2 mills at 4".
The runout spec for my Jet manual mill is 0.8 mills at 12" and my machine measures about 0.5 mills.

The next two questions regard the test block. It looks like they mill out a 6" by 2" block on one of every 20 machines in a batch.

The 'b' spec. parallelism of the top of the block to the bottom is .06mm or 2.4 mills. This doesn't seem very good. Am I wrong?

The 'c' spec. is the perpendicularity of one side to the top and to the other side. This is .06mm over 50mm or 2.4 mills over 2". Again, this seems kind of loose.

How does this compare with the expected performance of a more expensive machine like a Haas?

My eternal gratitude for any feedback from some of you old pro's out there!
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 12-29-2006, 12:10 AM
widgitmaster's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Age: 60
Posts: 2,348
widgitmaster is on a distinguished road

I do not own a Tormak mill, but the specifications of the test block seem ok to me! If you take in to consideration the end mill is supported on one end only, that the amount of flex and deflection will increase as the feedrate incrases!
Also, how accurately was the head trammed square prior to running the test?
The other element to take into consideration is the quality of the endmill! Some endmills have a slight taper even when new!

The only true test to the machines squareness is to sweep the table with a .0001" dial indicator mounted in the spindle!

Eric
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 12-29-2006, 01:38 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,669
Mariss Freimanis is on a distinguished road

It looks like terrific machine to me. I will probably order one sometime next year.

Mariss
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 12-29-2006, 10:26 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: US
Posts: 2,782
ViperTX is on a distinguished road

Cool Mariss....then maybe you or we can come with a logo and slogan...."You've been Gecko-ized!"
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 12-29-2006, 09:12 PM
zephyr9900's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 926
zephyr9900 is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Mariss Freimanis View Post
It looks like terrific machine to me. I will probably order one sometime next year.
Mariss, does that mean that you and Tormach have come to an agreement? If so, is it something you'd be willing to comment on?

The best of the New Year to you, and Tormach.

Randy

P.S. I've taken this past week off work to (try to) complete a long term project at home, and have been either running my Tormach, or doing CAD work for it, for 14-16 hours a day and loving it. The Tormach is a very solid machine, and is plenty accurate for the work I'm doing with it.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 12-30-2006, 02:25 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 4
sav1234 is on a distinguished road

Gentlemen
Thanks for the feedback!
Have a great new year!
Bruce
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 12-30-2006, 06:15 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Posts: 1,859
philbur is on a distinguished road

That sounds like a very tight tolerance at 12" from the spindle. IIRC standard collets normally have a concentricity tolerance of 0.8 thou. at the collet. What kind of a test bar are you using and how are you mounting it in the spindle.

Regards
Phil

Originally Posted by sav1234 View Post
The runout spec for my Jet manual mill is 0.8 mills at 12" and my machine measures about 0.5 mills.
!
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 12-31-2006, 02:15 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 4
sav1234 is on a distinguished road
Smile Responce to Jet mill spindle runout question

I'm not sure. I'm just going by the inspection sheet that came with my mill. It just states 0.4 mills at the spindle, 0.8 mills at 12", and that mine measured 0.551 mills at 12". I did measure it at the spindle and there is an immeasurable fluxuation with a 1 mill indicator. I'm not complaining!
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 12-31-2006, 02:41 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,669
Mariss Freimanis is on a distinguished road

[QUOTE=ProtoTrains;235562]Mariss, does that mean that you and Tormach have come to an agreement? If so, is it something you'd be willing to comment on?

I think I'll leave that for Greg Jackson to make mention on if he wants. I'll just say some positive things have happened.

Mariss
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 12-31-2006, 11:01 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: US
Posts: 2,782
ViperTX is on a distinguished road

Well that is great Mariss....those little tirades were getting to be a bit much...understandable, but a bit much....
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 01-01-2007, 06:15 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Posts: 1,859
philbur is on a distinguished road

For my own interest, what did you use for a test bar and how was it mounted in the spindle.

Regards
Phil

Originally Posted by sav1234 View Post
I'm not sure. I'm just going by the inspection sheet that came with my mill. It just states 0.4 mills at the spindle, 0.8 mills at 12", and that mine measured 0.551 mills at 12". I did measure it at the spindle and there is an immeasurable fluxuation with a 1 mill indicator. I'm not complaining!
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353