CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Electronics > Stepper Motors and Drives


Stepper Motors and Drives Discuss stepper motors, drivers and related topics here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 11-10-2004, 08:35 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: U.S.
Posts: 40
DragnsBane is on a distinguished road
Gear reduction

When one uses a gear reduction to increase torque, wouldn't you in essence also get a microstepping effect too? For example if one uses a 4:1 reduction the drive gear would have to move four times for the driven gear to complete one revolution. A 1/4 step. So if this is true then one could use a half stepping driver, add a 4:1 reduction and get a 1/8 step machine. Am I right on this?
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 11-10-2004, 09:27 PM
ynneb's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 2,571
ynneb is on a distinguished road

As you say " In essence" this is true.

You need to work out how much axis travel a stepper step will tranlate into. If the end of the travel is small enough, (acceptable tolerance) then use it.

Because most computer software can only drive at certain top speeds (PPS), it would be wrong to gear down your drive too much, because that would reduce the top speed that your axis can travel at.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 11-10-2004, 10:11 PM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 19,570
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by DragnsBane
When one uses a gear reduction to increase torque, wouldn't you in essence also get a microstepping effect too? For example if one uses a 4:1 reduction the drive gear would have to move four times for the driven gear to complete one revolution. A 1/4 step. So if this is true then one could use a half stepping driver, add a 4:1 reduction and get a 1/8 step machine. Am I right on this?
Sort of but not really. The main benefit of microstepping is smoothness, and minimizing stepper resonance. Not added resolution. The reason for this is that the more microsteps you have, the less torque each one will have, as microstepping drives basically split the full step torque into the smaller steps. because of this, the torque for say a 1/8 step may not be enought o maove your machine, but the torque will accumulate with each succesive microstep until the motor can turn, then it will basically move all those microsteps up to that point.

A microstepping driver will usually run much smoother than a half step driver. Half and full step drivers can suffer from resonances which can cause lost steps. Microstepping can help to minimize or eliminate this resonance.

Another problem with gearing down steppers, is that steppers have there highest torque when they are not spinning. By gearing them to spin faster, you end up with less torque. But the gearing would cancel that out, leaving you with probably the same amount of power at the same speed if you didn't have the gearing.

Having said all that, all machines are different, and what you're proposing may work well for what you are doing. Give it a try and let us know if it works.
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 11-11-2004, 06:36 AM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 19,570
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

You might want to read this for more info on what I said above.

http://www.machinedesign.com/ASP/vie...strSite=MDSite
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Started to build my plasma table. Apples Plasma, EDM and other similar machine Project Log 122 07-27-2008 04:41 PM
NASA gear bearing by mister Vranish wolphje General Metalwork Discussion 1 07-28-2005 02:28 PM
gear pitch 2muchstuff Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design 5 04-02-2005 09:04 AM
Adding a manual gear change call MILLMANM Post Processors for MC 5 01-04-2005 11:05 PM
Basic Bevel Gear - Milling a valley for gear teeth ngr1 General CAM Discussion 9 04-17-2004 04:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353