CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Hobby Projects > Steam Engines


Steam Engines Discuss your live steam engine creations here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 01:58 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 42
bogstandard is on a distinguished road
Totally manual workshop

I have a totally manual workshop, consisting of an Atlas 10f lathe dating from the late 1930's, a Picador mill/drill from the 80's and a Herbert manual surface grinder from the 50's. I have restored them all and brought them up to date.
Later this year I hope to invest in a small CNC mill, as even with 3 axis digital readout on my mill it is very time consuming drilling and reaming so many holes in the projects I have undertaken.
I have already built and run numerous steam engines and one four stroke side valve, water cooled petrol engine.
At the moment I am building a few twin cylinder oscillators (wobblers for those in the US) and the attached picture shows what stage I am up to, they all need surface grinding all over, but that comes after the tapping stage.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Cylinders and Standards.jpg‎
Views:	705
Size:	90.2 KB
ID:	33188  
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 03-08-2007, 02:44 AM
*Registered*
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: England
Posts: 138
nick.gilling is on a distinguished road

They look excellent. I thought of doing a batch myself and selling a few off!

A surface grinder is a nice luxury to have and gives a very professional look and is obviously better than rubbing on a bit of emery cloth like I have to do for the port faces!

Got two questions...

What is the feature at the end of each cylinder? Is that cosmetic or just to further reduce the friction?

Also, why have you chosen to put the ports where they are instead of at the extreme ends of the cylinder? I have never thought of doing that before simply because of the more awkward angled hole. I can think of a few reasons for doing it now I've seen yours though. Have you done it to optomise the distance between the ports? (that was governed by the length of the piston rod and stroke on mine but your way gives more flexibility) Or was it so that your cylinder cover bolts don't interfere with the port? Are the covers going to be bolted? The only other reason I can think of is so that the port doesn't become uncovered by the cylinder when at 90 deg btdc like the mistake I made on mine! Or am I off the mark with these thoughts?

Thanks, you've given me some more ideas, although I want to tackle something more complicated than an oscillator next. I'm fed up of making those now but at least it was an inexpensive way to get back into the swing of things.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 05:22 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 42
bogstandard is on a distinguished road

Hi Nick,
The 'feature' is just another way to reduce the friction to as little as possible.
The ports on this engine are all either straight in or up and down, ie. drill in the side, then drill from the top straight down to hit the side drilling, no complicated angle drilling at all, then just a small milled 'nick' connects the port to either the top or bottom of the piston (just enough to allow steam to bypass the top & bottom cover locating flanges).
The top covers are all bolted on with 2mm stainless cap screws.
The engine is a french design, a couple of minor mistakes on the plans, but it is 10mm bore with 20mm stroke, double acting, with a sealed bearing crankshaft support, so should run nice and slow and turn about 3" to 3 1/2" steam prop.
I left 0.002" oversize on all flat surfaces to allow for surface grinding, this saves hours trying to get the port faces flat by lapping.
The reason I am making six of these is that they are fairly expensive to produce, with bearings and all stainless fixings and fittings, I will be selling four to recoup my costs.
I have just finished an E.T.Westbury designed 'Whippet', a very nice project that gives a lot of challenges. My next project is the 'Seal' by the same designer, a four cylinder side valve petrol engine.

John
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 03-08-2007, 06:02 AM
*Registered*
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: England
Posts: 138
nick.gilling is on a distinguished road

Hi John,

I've always liked the look of the Whippet engine and fancied giving it a go.

When I first got into the hobby when I was about 15, I bought the Woking Precision Models catalogue and made a big mistake. I bought the castings and drawings for the Sparey 0.8cc compression ignition engine! With hindsight I don't think this was the ideal model to start with! Needless to say I messed up every component I attempted and then gave up! Infact I'm still using the material left over from it, the other day I used a bit of brass for my oscillating engine that had "carb body" written on it in felt tip pen ... this is 12 years later!

I now think my skills are about good enough to attempt a flame licker or hot air engine so I want try one of those next then move onto an i.c. engine.

The main project I started was a 5" gauge sweet pea, I'm confident I can machine the components but the size of the task is daunting. I have no time now I am married and have a 1 year old son, so what I do do, I want to see results relatively quickly for! I must have been serious at the time with Sweet Pea though, I bought a brand new professional boiler for £500 thats sat under my bench, I'm told they're now circa £1000 though so that wasn't a bad investment!

Good look with the Seal, that's a lovely engine too, my ultimate goal one day, way out of my league at the moment though!

Nick
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 08:23 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,128
Mcgyver is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by bogstandard View Post
the attached picture shows what stage I am up to, they all need surface grinding all over, but that comes after the tapping stage.
John, the work looks good, are they brass or bronze? reason i ask i've never considered surface grinding copper based alloys, wondering what the results are like and what wheel you use. I've a Norton manual grinder, probably the least used piece i have, but admit its nice having. gets used mostly for tooling that i get case hardened.

Always like the Seal, nice project - please take lots of pics and post them. I've wondered how difficult it would to carve the block and from solid and avoid the castings or maybe the cost of the castings isn't so bad? always seems ridiculous by the time they get to north america.

Nick, don't sweat not having a surface grinder, I've got one and would still finish and piece of brass off with progressive grades of emery and the surface plate

good luck with it and keep the pics coming
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 09:33 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 42
bogstandard is on a distinguished road

Hi Mcgyver,
The bits shown are all brass. I use a standard grey carburundum wheel for grinding all my non ferrous materials, but I do dress fairly often to keep the wheel unclogged. They all come up with a mirror finish, aluminium as well. For all my ferrous work I use White Aluminium Oxide (loose bond) that a friend gets me from his works, when they wear down to 5" they are normally thrown away, but they are ideal for my machine, they use them for grinding guide vanes for aero engines.
With reference to the Seal, I purchased everything to build it a couple of years back, even down to the spark plugs, but since then Woking Precision has gone belly up, and all the rights have been taken over by Hemingway Kits, but they are going to remaster everything before releasing it, so expect everything to double in price. Looking at the plans there is really nothing that couldn't be hogged out of the solid, in fact I think you would find it a lot easier than making from castings, the main reason you could start from a flat and square datum, on the castings there isn't a flat or square part on them.
Before I start the build I have to make a camshaft grinder, for the Whippet I made it in the lathe using jigs, but that only had two lobes (both with different profiles for inlet & exhaust), I made two just in case, but as it turned out they were both good, but the seal has eight lobes, again with two different profiles, so the cam grinder will be born. I am also considering whether it could be used for grinding the valves as well, as these are much smaller than the whippet valves, and getting a good finish on the stems is always a problem, but I suppose I could use my toolpost grinder if all else fails (I don't really like using it because it covers the lathe in what could be described as rough grinding paste, and no matter how much you cover things up you always get some 'leakage')

John
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 10:41 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,128
Mcgyver is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by bogstandard View Post
in fact I think you would find it a lot easier than making from castings, the main reason you could start from a flat and square datum, on the castings there isn't a flat or square part on them.
John
John, thanks for the grinding, info i'll have to give it a go!

on the seal, pretty sure i have the old ME issues it first appeared in, the $@#%$ won't even get my dough for the plans. hehe

I hear you on the castings, I've made engines from castings and the uninitiated often look at them and suppose that making it from castings was 'easier' because the basic shape is provide, au contraire!

I've long been a casting snob....however recently have been rethinking it. Castings are ridiculously expensive, and while one hand they are judged to be a more authentic model based on materials, in fact from an appearance standpoint greater detail and better scaled look can be achieved via some, albeit very complex, fabrications. Poster Keith and the chaski site has made two corliss engines that imo look superior to kits such as the Coles model. The reason is that when scaled down, the details of the casting can end up to rounded off and blob like for a true scale representation. Keith's work is as good or greater than Kozo's excellent silver solder fabrications imo.

Notwithstanding some of the kits cost $1000. What hasn't emerged though (that i've seen) are plans of a major project, say a triple expansion or corliss engine, that are intended to take advantage of the detail possible with fabrication.
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 12:11 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 42
bogstandard is on a distinguished road

Hi Mcgyver,
I agree with you about castings, some are very 'dodgy' indeed. The main crankcase for my whippet had been over fettled by the foundry by 1/8" on the water jacket area, I got my friend who supplies my grinding wheels to take it into work where a coded welder built it up again, now you can't tell anything was ever wrong.
If you go to here - http://modelenginenews.org/index.html
and select November 2006 you will see a build of the Seal by some of the best model engineers around.
I think all the parts I bought for the seal came to about $600 but that included everything (gears, plans, piston rings etc) except raw materials, like cast iron for the cylinders (I use old sash window weights). But even though it was designed in the 1940's no-one has ever corrected the faults on the drawings. Maybe Hemingway will do it when they get around to it.
If ever you require any of the info for the seal I am sure I could copy it for you.

John
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 01:52 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,565
Geof will become famous soon enough

Originally Posted by bogstandard View Post
....The main crankcase for my whippet had been over fettled by the foundry....John
Hands up how many people know what "fettled" means. Apologies for the intrusion, I had not seen the word for many decades.
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 02:06 PM
greybeard's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Age: 73
Posts: 1,368
greybeard is on a distinguished road

Depends on how many potters are reading the thread.

Ditto re intrusion - I just like to know how the other half lives !

John
__________________
It's like doing jigsaw puzzles in the dark.
Enjoy today's problems, for tomorrow's may be worse.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 04:04 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 42
bogstandard is on a distinguished road

Its a common term in the area of the UK that I come from. But it is used even more in the so called black country, north west of Birmingham where there still exists a fair amount of small foundries. I also think it is used in the potteries of Staffordshire (very close to where I live), in the same sort of context, cleaning off excess casting material or rough edges.
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2007, 04:17 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,565
Geof will become famous soon enough

Originally Posted by bogstandard View Post
...context, cleaning off excess casting material or rough edges.
I did my share of fettling during my apprenticeship in New Zealand.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Totally Lost FAMOUSX1 Computers and Networking 19 07-12-2007 01:36 PM
Please tell me if I´m totally off PSU gotis General Electronics Discussion 4 08-09-2006 09:59 PM
Totally New to Machining Where to start Warlock General Metalwork Discussion 2 08-05-2006 05:50 PM
Totally Fed UP!!! rhino Servo Motors and Drives 6 06-02-2006 02:06 AM
Totally new at CNC mochi30 DIY-CNC Router Table Machines 10 06-11-2005 10:29 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361