![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| SprutCAM Discuss SprutCAM software here. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| You can sometimes stop these by choosing the "start in center of workpiece" on the strategy tab which may be currently set for "start outside workpiece." If doing this causes the entire toolpath to not be created when you re-run the operation then you can create a rectanular "fixture" block just outside the workpiece opening (outside by a bit less than the cutter radius). This will keep the cutter from going outside and around the corner. - Terry |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| The online help that describes how to use open Job Zones is very clear and easy to understand. The documentation for the new version is a big improvement. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| So let's ask this, what function do yo use to face a part on each end before you machine the rest of it's shapes and holes? |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Could you reformulate it please? |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
|
If I just need to clean up the ends, I'll create a Finishing -> 2D Contouring operation. Then I add the top edges from the faces I want machined to the job assignment. Last edited by wvines; 12-22-2009 at 09:31 AM. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| R.DesJardin - I must have missed your original post in December. I have had that same issue in SC2007, and the only way I could stop it was to create artificial "fixtures" to keep it out of certain areas. It was never a great fix, but it usually worked. That kind of extra motion is the most frustrating thing about SprutCAM that I have noticed. Not only is it wasted time, but it also affects the part's finish. Does SC7 handle these types of areas much better? I have not upgraded yet because my understanding is that once I upgrade, my dongle will no longer work with the 2007 version. I don't want to make an irreversible decision if I'm not going to like it later.... Regards, - Just Gary |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
Good news, in SC7 I've been using 2D contouring. This seems to be the solution and allows customizable lead in and out moves to be able to clear the workpiece. I have had no issues with SC7 and I'm running it on an old(2+yrs) laptop with XP on it. My biggest problem is probably not knowing which operation to pick to machine with. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need Help!- unwanted features | caddisfly | BobCad-Cam | 17 | 07-20-2009 12:12 PM |
| unwanted circles | Prboz | Mach Mill | 5 | 03-23-2009 10:24 AM |
| Need Help!- unwanted z moves | Claude Boudreau | BobCad-Cam | 12 | 03-18-2009 03:20 PM |
| unwanted finish lines | corrie | Vectric | 13 | 11-30-2008 07:06 PM |
| Unwanted Z-movement... | sweFredrik | Machines running Mach Software | 2 | 04-27-2008 05:40 PM |