CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > CAD Software > Solidworks


Solidworks Discuss Solidworks software here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 07-05-2006, 06:51 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 32
phatfred8 is on a distinguished road
Sheet Metal Patterns

Hello,

A friend asked me to try and get a offset cone drawn and then unfold it to have a templet for cutting the part out. I can do it the old fashsioned way(drafting and layout) but would like to get it done in solidworks. I have attached the drawing that i made and would like any help on maybe what i mite be doing wrong.

Thanks in advance,

Brian
Attached Files
File Type: zip Part3.zip‎ (67.2 KB, 186 views)
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 07-06-2006, 12:34 PM
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 90
scubanick is on a distinguished road

to unfold it it needs to be a sheet metal part
a normal swept pattern is not goin to do it
u can either redraw it trying to make it a sheet metal part first
or convert this boss/base feature to a sheetmetal part
probably easier to start off drawing it as a sheet metal part
i have had some customers come to me with just boss/base featured parts
and i have to try to convert them to sheet metal parts to get them to unfold
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 07-06-2006, 04:46 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,613
JerryFlyGuy is on a distinguished road

You started on the correct track, however you don't need to do the complete profile [ thickness] of the part, you simply draw a single line profile at the top & bottom and then use a lofted sheet metal part to create your loft. You can find the function at --> Insert/Sheet metal /Lofted Bends

Some trick's I've used are:
1) Use the first sketch [ usually the larger profile] to drive the bottom one.
You'll see I've got const. lines from the center of my part to the ends of the profile, I then put the ends of the bottom profile coincident onto the const lines of the first sketch, this way the ends [or opening] will taper uniformly from top to bottom.

2) constrain the ends of the first profile so they are horizontal to each other, this way the split will be centered. I use a dim [not angular] between the end points to control the width.

3) Lofted bends doesn't use K factors so draw your two profiles at your calculated K factor, this only really matters if your doing stuff that is 1/8" or thicker.. If you don't take this into account your part will end up being to large or small depending if you used an inside or outside profile.

4) I've also drawn the profiles [ depending on the situation] as a bunch of equal length straight lines that have all their end points coincident on a const. circle. The circle drives the overall size of the profiles, you have to fillet each line joint, but you will end up with a part that better represents how it will look once broke. Remember to use the same fillet size on the bottom sketch as on the top or things will get wanky on you.

There's lots of other little nick-nak's but this will get you started.

If you want the Lofted Bends on your tool bar, find an area of your tool bars which is blank and right click.. go down to the bottom at"customize", then the "commands" tab, then cycle through the list of commands levels until you find "sheet metal" , find the lofted bends icon and drag it onto the toolbar you want it on.. and voila..

Jerry
Attached Files
File Type: zip Part3-r1.zip‎ (138.7 KB, 135 views)
__________________
JerryFlyGuy
The more I know... the more I realize I don't
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 07-06-2006, 07:53 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 32
phatfred8 is on a distinguished road
Thanks

Hello,

I will try what you have posted after i reply. I am using solid works 2000 and do not have the loft bend. Just add bends. The guy that asked me to look into this has solid works 2006. I have seen the button on his system but do not have much time behind the drivers seat. I will forward this on to him.

Thanks for the help,

Brian Muenchau
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 07-06-2006, 10:48 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,613
JerryFlyGuy is on a distinguished road

I think you can get insert bends to work, but.. and its a big but.. you'll have to take the profiles and add a straight segment into them. This segment will then need a fillet into the curved profile. If you taper the straight segment proportionally from top to bottom and then loft it "thin" [ or w/ a full drawn profile.. either will work] you should be able to click on the straight/flat segment of the cone and "insert bends".. its a work around... i've never had to use it but.. its possible..

It's been a few years since I drove 2000.

Jerry [learning something new everyday..]
__________________
JerryFlyGuy
The more I know... the more I realize I don't
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 01-30-2007, 09:50 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 32
phatfred8 is on a distinguished road
Cool Thanks Jerry

Jerry,

I been meaning to post a picture of a finished part for you to see. My friend and me made 8 total. Material was 6061-t6 and after I did the welding he sent the parts to get anodized. Turned out real nice after the learning curve was traveled. Draw the part, Cut out the part, make dies for the press brake, procedure to bend parts right, the fit and weld. Bending the cone was 15 bends per half and depth setting ranging from .030" to .078" per hit. I rolled the cylinder on a 36" Wysong slip roll, that was the easy part(7" dia. x 22" tall x .062"). But when it was all said and done it was pretty cool.

Thanks for the help Jerry,

Brian
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	9102006 058-1.jpg‎
Views:	128
Size:	129.8 KB
ID:	30669   Click image for larger version

Name:	9102006 059-1.jpg‎
Views:	154
Size:	98.5 KB
ID:	30670  
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 01-30-2007, 10:47 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,613
JerryFlyGuy is on a distinguished road

Hey no problem.. I get a kick outta helping others, I don't know it all, thats for sure, but if I can help... well.. it makes a fella feel good

Jerry
__________________
JerryFlyGuy
The more I know... the more I realize I don't
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 05-19-2009, 12:14 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Thailand
Posts: 279
mattpatt is on a distinguished road
A couple of years on........

Concerning unfolding cones. The actual design and unfolding is not too big a problem. But I've been thinking about the k factor.

Let's say my cone uses 1mm steel. The large diameter is 100mm (OD), small diameter 30mm (OD), centreline length is 200mm.

I've not really played with the k factor, but it seems to make a lot of difference.

I've been using 0.5 as the K factor, but surely is won't be a constant number due to the difference in the bend radii. And if I change the factor to 1 then the actual flat pattern output comes closer to the truth

I guess the best way is to roll a bunch of cones and work out some numbers, or there's the lazy way and ask what others are using.

Any help appreciated.

Matt.
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 05-19-2009, 12:57 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,613
JerryFlyGuy is on a distinguished road

The actual 'book' value for K factor while bending w/ a standard press brake is 0.42. Most people use 0.50 because it's easy to calculate [it's what they've always used when doing things by hand calculations etc]

There are other things which come into play when breaking complex shapes. Die placement overlap, top die taper etc. Also some people would set up and roll cones [yours is probably too small to roll] but when rolling sheet metal I've had all kinds of variations from cut parts and it's all due to operator technique. Some operators put so much pressure between the rolls that the part actually rolls thinner [think rolling out dough] while the next person doesn't have this problem. It can cause serious issues when we laser cut parts and then roll them in a production environment.

Keep in mind also that there will be serious effects on placement in the dies while forming. If I'm off by 1mm on a cone which is 300mm at the minor diameter I'm off by 0.3%, if you do the same w/ your cone you'd be off by 3.3% which will make a huge difference in the accuracy of the final product vs the initial cut part and this could be interperated as a k factor issue.

fwiw

J
__________________
JerryFlyGuy
The more I know... the more I realize I don't
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 05-20-2009, 02:13 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Thailand
Posts: 279
mattpatt is on a distinguished road

Thanks for the reply. All good info.

For your info, the cones are hand formed by 'teasing' them around a tapered anvil, or through my home made tapered rollers.

Anyway, the actual cone I'm working on is 97 OD large dia. and 31mm OD small dia. Length is 200mm.

I made a card template and cut the (1mm) steel following this pattern, which was generated at K=1. The rolled cone came out at 98.5mm OD large and 32.5mm OD small. Unsurprisingly (following your comments) using a K=0.5 the rolled cone came out pretty much spot on. Definitely close enough for what I want.

For your info I'm designing the cone using a revolved profile, but revolving it 359.8 degree. Tried a couple of other methods, namely boss/base loft and then cut/extrude and thin a single line to make the cut, then sheet metal bends. Also using sheet metal lofted bends on two sketched open profiles. All seem to work in their own way, depending on the cone diameters and angles and the gap cut in the cone to make the unfold possible.

I'm happy now.

Thanks for all your help.

Matt.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11  
Old 05-20-2009, 02:53 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,613
JerryFlyGuy is on a distinguished road

Typically for cones I'd use a lofted bend as I find it to be the quickest. One thing to remember when using lofted bends is that the drawn geometry is assumed to be on the 'k factor' line. The graphical representation of the loft is then off a little bit [as it's either offset outside or inside the geometry line], but the calculated values of the flat layout will be alot more accurate. At least thats how it was a year or two ago.. I haven't stopped to test it since the last couple releases.

J
__________________
JerryFlyGuy
The more I know... the more I realize I don't
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 05-21-2009, 12:52 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Thailand
Posts: 279
mattpatt is on a distinguished road

Thanks J. I'll give that a go and see how we get on.

FYI I'm using SW2007.

Matt.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361