CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > CAM Software > SolidCam


SolidCam Discuss SolidCam software here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 02-05-2010, 12:25 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 15
mr chris is on a distinguished road
Solid CAM file system

I'm new to SolidCAM and am really struggling to understand how it deals with files.

From my solid model, SolidCAM seems to have created some new files, including a design model, and a CAM part, inside an assembly.

Firstly I don't really understand why this is necessary, and secondly, how do I then, for example save a particular assembly as another file name. Where does the file(s) go? It seems to dissapear.

It seems very convoluted and is all very confusing. I guess I'm just not understanding the idea behind doing it like this.

On solid works, if i wanted to save as a new name I simply save the file (assembly or part) with a new name. This seems impossible in SolidCAM.

Also, SolidCAM seems to be very UN-parametric. The contours don't seem to update if i change the original part file, and i have to retrace everything. This seems mad! Isn't the point of SolidWorks and CAM that its parametric?

Very confused! Any help greatly appreciated.

Cheers,

Chris.
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 02-07-2010, 08:10 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Thailand
Posts: 279
mattpatt is on a distinguished road

The design model is referenced to the original part.

If you need to make any changes to a part, then do it to the original part. When you then load up the SC it will see that the referenced model has been altered ans ask if you want to replace the model. You'll then synchronize this new design model and if it hasn't been radically altered then a lot of the selected geometry for profiles etc will remain, but at the new design spec.

I think it's wise not to change the design model in the assembly within SC otherwise you'll lose track of what's going on with the original. Well, I would!

I'm sure others will be able to go a little more in depth than this.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 02-07-2010, 08:24 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 61
dengo is on a distinguished road

I agree with Mattpatt. Do any changes to the original SW part that you used to create your SC job. When you open the Cam model again it will recognise the original has been modified and prompt you to continue.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 02-08-2010, 08:03 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 393
Brakeman Bob is on a distinguished road

SolidCAM creates an assembly made up of a clone of your part (the DesignPart) and new part inside the assembly called the CAM part because you wouldn't want to unwittingly mess up your original part whilst programming the CAM, would you. This Assembly is very useful you can add fixturing, masking surfaces and the like and it all keeps together (though the clones of your fixtures don't update like the DesignPart).

When you make changes to you original part make sure that SolidCAM is closed and then when you reopen SolidCAM the message will pop up that "the Source Model has changed and you ou like to update?". This message will come up after every time you save the original part regardless if the part has changed or not.

If you make changes to the DesignPart in the CAM assembly you will break the link to the original and it is the devils own game to restore.

Tha CAM assembly is held in a folder named the same as your CAM part and will be in the location you have specified in CAM settings. If you haven't set a location so a search for partname.PRT and the folder will be in that vicinity.

As for SolidAM being unassociative,well that depends on how good you are at structuring your feature tree in SolidWorks as the CAM geometries are driven off the feature database in the DesignPart so if you roll back the feature tree and add a lot of features and force a rebuild, the associated geometries will be disrupted. I find it better to make sketches of geometries in the CAM part that reference the DesignPart as this seems more robust when messing with the original (or Seed) Part. But of course, if you start adding features in the Design part rather than the Seed part you're buggered.

Be aware that adding configurations to your Seed Part after you've started a CAM part can be very problematic. Best practice would be to make all your configs in the Seed part before commencing the CAM and then using the "Split" function in the SolidCAM job tree separate up the different geometries.
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 02-08-2010, 11:41 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 15
mr chris is on a distinguished road

Hi, thanks to all on this. I now "get it"!

I didn't realise that you have to close the SC assembly and re-open before it updates the CAM / Design models in the assembly. Why you have to do that, have no idea? It would seem a simple job for SC to be notified by SW when the part it updated when its still open, but hey ho.

As for this configurations business, I'll have a go and see how it flows, and let you know!

Chris.


Originally Posted by Brakeman Bob View Post
SolidCAM creates an assembly made up of a clone of your part (the DesignPart) and new part inside the assembly called the CAM part because you wouldn't want to unwittingly mess up your original part whilst programming the CAM, would you. This Assembly is very useful you can add fixturing, masking surfaces and the like and it all keeps together (though the clones of your fixtures don't update like the DesignPart).

When you make changes to you original part make sure that SolidCAM is closed and then when you reopen SolidCAM the message will pop up that "the Source Model has changed and you ou like to update?". This message will come up after every time you save the original part regardless if the part has changed or not.

If you make changes to the DesignPart in the CAM assembly you will break the link to the original and it is the devils own game to restore.

Tha CAM assembly is held in a folder named the same as your CAM part and will be in the location you have specified in CAM settings. If you haven't set a location so a search for partname.PRT and the folder will be in that vicinity.

As for SolidAM being unassociative,well that depends on how good you are at structuring your feature tree in SolidWorks as the CAM geometries are driven off the feature database in the DesignPart so if you roll back the feature tree and add a lot of features and force a rebuild, the associated geometries will be disrupted. I find it better to make sketches of geometries in the CAM part that reference the DesignPart as this seems more robust when messing with the original (or Seed) Part. But of course, if you start adding features in the Design part rather than the Seed part you're buggered.

Be aware that adding configurations to your Seed Part after you've started a CAM part can be very problematic. Best practice would be to make all your configs in the Seed part before commencing the CAM and then using the "Split" function in the SolidCAM job tree separate up the different geometries.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem- solid to iges or dwg file chaz6966 BobCad-Cam 1 02-23-2009 09:32 AM
How do I set solid stock properly on this file? billholeman Mastercam 2 12-13-2008 09:36 PM
DWG from a solid file cijunet Solidworks 22 05-09-2008 05:48 PM
Solid Model CAD file(s) of HF 44991 / X2 Mini Mill? blades Benchtop Machines 2 12-26-2007 06:05 PM
Questions On Solid Verify For Multiple Parts That Reside In One File Mastercam User Mastercam 11 12-18-2007 02:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361