What is more accurate


Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: What is more accurate

  1. #1
    Registered cncadmin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6855
    Downloads
    3
    Uploads
    4

    Default What is more accurate

    Thank You,
    Paul G

    Check out-
    [URL="http://www.signs101.com"]www.signs101.com[/URL]


  2. #2
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    106
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I think the accuracy will be controlled by the axis drive system, regardless if the table moves or the head moves. I think the gantry style is more rigid, though.



  3. #3
    Registered cncman2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    How about for a small hobby machine with a table of 18" x 24" or 24" x 48" ?

    Tom


  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Victoria Canada
    Posts
    3
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default Re: What is more accurate

    Originally posted by CNCadmin
    a sliding table CNC machine or a fixed gantry?
    isn't that the same thing. If the table slides then the gantry would be fixed , yes ?

    I have found both to be good. I find the moving gantry a little easier to nock out of square in the event of a collision. I believe the moving gantry is also cheaper but I am not sure really why it would be but most of the less expensive system use the moving gantry.

    JMO

    China Syndrome.......


  5. #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    106
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Also consider your space requirements. A machine with a stationary table and moving head will take up less floor space than one with a moving table.



  6. #6
    Registered HomeCNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    779
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Also think about the size of the part. On a fixed table I can hang a long part out with supports and not need to worry about it moving around.

    Thanks

    Jeff Davis (HomeCNC)
    http://www.homecnc.info


    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)


  7. #7
    Registered cncman2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    31
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Great info. I like the sliding table aproch, it seams it would be easyer to build, but would take up more space.

    Tom


  8. #8
    Registered balsaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2139
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Mine has a sliding table. Easier to build and it's easier to move the table than an entire gantry assembly.

    Eric

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails What is more accurate-cnczzj-jpg  
    I wish it wouldn't crash.


  9. #9
    Registered cncadmin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6855
    Downloads
    3
    Uploads
    4

    Default

    Did you build that machine?

    Thank You,
    Paul G

    Check out-
    [URL="http://www.signs101.com"]www.signs101.com[/URL]


  10. #10
    Registered balsaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2139
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Yes.

    I got all the expensive parts from the scrap bin where I work (linear rails/bearings). I work in an autoparts factory and they were scrapping some equipment. I used a FET 3 board from stepperworld. I get 48" per minute rapids on a 27 volt powersupply.

    Eric

    I wish it wouldn't crash.


  11. #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    77
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    I just started welding up a machine of the same layout this morning. I spent a very long time figuring out how I wanted to build this machine. I need a machine which is very precise. I make wood and brass camera parts which need to be machined to +/-.0015. I felt it would be easier to make a rigid fixed gantry/column and moving table than it would be to make a moving gantry. I realize that a moving table takes up more floor space than a gantry, but floor space was a secondary consideration to rigidity. I machine boards less than 12 inches wide and can saw the brass sheets I use to 12 inch widths. The longest parts I will machine are less than 24 inches and less than 3 inches wide. To be able to get multiple parts from one board, I decided to make the machine have 6 feet of X and 1 foot of Y. Part thickness will always be less than 2 inches. To add some flexibility to the machine, I decided pretty much arbitrarily to build in 5 inches of Z travel plus 6 inches to allow for long cutting tools for a total of 11 inches in Z.

    The machine is consructed of 2X2 steel hot rolled tubing with a rather heavy 1/4 inch wall. This is heavy and stiff material. Hopefully it will make a rigid machine.

    Barry Young
    Young Camera Company



  12. #12
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2712
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Old farts perspective; All the jig borers and jig mills are travelling table. This avoids "racking" and other geometry problems. There are many legitimate reasons for a traveling bridge, but I personally do not believe accuracy is one of them. Extraordinary effort is required to make them so and are easilly "knocked kattywumpus" compared to a properly designed and built rigid bridge type machine. You youngster ever hear of SIP? Keep your humor now.

    DZASTR


  13. #13
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    77
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RICHARD ZASTROW View Post
    Old farts perspective; All the jig borers and jig mills are travelling table. This avoids "racking" and other geometry problems. There are many legitimate reasons for a traveling bridge, but I personally do not believe accuracy is one of them. Extraordinary effort is required to make them so and are easilly "knocked kattywumpus" compared to a properly designed and built rigid bridge type machine. You youngster ever hear of SIP? Keep your humor now.
    I ran SIP and DeVleig jig borers and grinders for Boeing. SIP makes the best machines I have ever run. Sorry to bust your bubble pops. Lots of younger people run precise machines. They are fine machines. Moore also makes an excellent machine you don't see very often any more. Fellows gear shapers are also very nice machines.

    Barry Young
    Young Camera Company



Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About CNCzone.com

    We are the largest and most active discussion forum for manufacturing industry. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

Follow us on


Our Brands

What is more accurate

What is more accurate