CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Electronics > Servo Motors and Drives


Servo Motors and Drives Discuss servo motors, drivers and other related topics here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2005, 12:04 PM
miljnor's Avatar
S.N.A.F.U.
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 1,844
miljnor is on a distinguished road
reduction vs direct connection

I've noticed reading through the forums that some CNC mill/drills are connected directly to the ballscrew and some use gear reduction. Normally i would assum this is do to the motors torque/rpm is greater or lesser on some of these machines. but the motors in some of the pictures look to be identical from machine to machine..

so my question is what advantages do you gain either way?

I am currently doing my first project as a mill/drill for Machining alluminum. will be using an old rutland/airgas mill/drill in good condition converting to square coulumn (like motimos?? awsome job by the way!)

I am making my mechanical drawings currently and reduction vs non makes a huge diffence in the bracketry.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 02-02-2005, 12:36 PM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,544
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

There is an inertia matching factor between load and motor and in order to calculate this you have to know the machine mass and rate of acceleration you need. If you go with a direct drive, obviously a larger motor and drive is required, this utilizes the maximum feed rate that can be obtained with this motor. If you go with reduction, a smaller amp and motor can be used, the trade off is that max feed is reduced and inherently backlash could possibly be introduced. This is a couple of things to consider.
Al
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 02-02-2005, 12:53 PM
WoodSnarfer's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 78
WoodSnarfer is on a distinguished road

One reason could be found in the lead screw. For example, an 8 TPI screw will transmit twice the torque (but half the speed) of a 4 TPI screw.

Also, just becuase the motors look the same, the armature windings could be different (different torque sensitivity), and/or they could be run at different voltages.

Steppers tend to be direct connected, since they produce more torque at the lowest RPMs possible. Servos have a pretty flat torque curve over their operating range, but most seem to have a 'sweet spot' between 2500 and 3000 RPM (thus usually requiring gearing to keep the lead screw RPMs at a safe & reasonable level).

Maybe the best bet is to figure out your force requirements at the cutting table, and work backwards...this should give you a spec by which you can compare steppers vs. servos (and what type of power transmission you should use).
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 02-02-2005, 01:07 PM
Torsten's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 260
Torsten is on a distinguished road

Comparing your options

The good things about direct drive:
1) No Power loses due to transmissions.
High efficency of performance.
2) Mountings are cheaper to make build buy.

The bad:
1) Torque curve of motor has to match the machine requirements.
Expensive to make corrections if gear ratios need to be changed.
May require different motors drivers or Leadscrews to alter.
2) position of motor can not be changed it may be above table hight.
3) Handwheels may be harder to mount if needed.

The good things about Pulleys:
1) Easy and cheap to make corrections to ratios by altering pulleys,
to fine tune Torque curve of motors to the application.
This part is most important for a one of a kind type of machine with
many unknown propertys.
2) Alignment problems can be solved by pulleys.
3) Freedom of component Positioning including hand wheels.
4) Damping properties reduce shatter vibrations.

The bad:
1) Mounting and Pulleys will be more expensive to build / buy.
2) A slight loss of Power due to transmition.
3) Small Additional source of backlash and flex.

Good Luck
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 02-02-2005, 02:59 PM
miljnor's Avatar
S.N.A.F.U.
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 1,844
miljnor is on a distinguished road

working out the force and revers engineering sounds good, but , its been a long time since I did any real math (computers ) any formulas you could suggest.. like a 3/8 carbide endmill cutting aluminum? Don't know the feeds you can get on a table like these but at work we run the 3/8 EM flat out (10000rpm or 7500rpm depending on machine) at around 45 to 55 Ipm. Granted this little machin probably won't be able to take that but I don't know since its my first project.

Also a sorce for pully's would be great.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6  
Old 02-02-2005, 07:29 PM
WoodSnarfer's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 78
WoodSnarfer is on a distinguished road

Arvid wrote a nice paper describing this...look here:

http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8129

For pulleys:

https://sdp-si.com/index.asp

I'm not a machinist, but I would guess that you don't need much force on a tool like that (if your cut depth isn't insane)...so I'd be looking at direct-coupled steppers.
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 02-02-2005, 08:10 PM
miljnor's Avatar
S.N.A.F.U.
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 1,844
miljnor is on a distinguished road

thanks that helps now I can calculate the HP required for the cutters I want and do the math myself...

Does anyone have a starting point for me, and I have decided to go the more pricey rout and buy servos for the closed loop accuracy..

by starting point i mean what they ve used successfully and their mill drills for metal cutting
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Direct drive with stepper on rack and pinion. jerryrigge Linear and Rotary Motion 24 10-09-2007 09:21 PM
gearbox reduction unit senor J. DIY-CNC Router Table Machines 3 12-13-2004 12:46 PM
Gear reduction DragnsBane Stepper Motors and Drives 3 11-11-2004 05:36 AM
Belts versus Direct Drive bsmith DIY-CNC Router Table Machines 12 06-06-2004 10:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361