CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Electronics > Servo Motors and Drives


Servo Motors and Drives Discuss servo motors, drivers and other related topics here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 06-10-2006, 09:22 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 221
REVCAM_Bob is on a distinguished road
Vertical system "jerks" and "bangs"??

I have a vertical oriented system driven by
a directly coupled 1/2" pitch ball screw to a
servo motor. We are useing a Galil 2 axis card.

The system was tuned and moves up well, but
when going down, it will at higher move rates
(greater than 90" per minute) "jerk" or "bang".
Sometimes this caused the system to error out. It happens more the higher the velocity is set to. It happens while in motion and more predominantly when trying to decel when going down. It never happens when going up. It is also more predominant as the weight on the system is increased. We have some auxiliary brakes on the system and it will work fine when we partially turn the brakes on. The jerk appears to be caused by the motor trying to stop or even momentarily reverse direction.

Is there any way to tune this out, I've played with all the pid parameters and nothing seems to help. I've even tried some of the il, fa, and fv parameters but nothing seemed to have any effect.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated!! Thank you.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 06-10-2006, 10:24 PM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,544
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

It is obvious you have some inertia issues, direct drive and fairly high lead ball screws do not help, Unless you have a very large system, I rarely use anything over .25" or .2" pitch, especially with no reduction.
Coming up with some kind of counter weight or cushion system system should alleviate it. I don't think trying to tune it out is the answer.
Al.
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 06-11-2006, 07:17 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 221
REVCAM_Bob is on a distinguished road

Thanks Al, but what makes it bad the way it is, is it just an inherant problem in all
systems that do not allow them to handle this situation? Is it something to to with
response time?
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 06-11-2006, 09:11 AM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,544
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

I suspect that with the set up you have at your programmed accel/decel rates you are exceeding the recommended motor/load inertia match, which is normally considered to be kept to less than 5:1.
The up side in reducing this is that any increase in reduction ratio by ballscrew lead or other means, reduces the existing inertia ratio by the square of the reduction, so it does not take much.
Generally the highest demands are during accel/decel and not neccessarily due to cutting forces etc.
By downloading one of the many system design graphic software from any of the servo manufacturers and entering your machine data can give you an insight to what might be happening, ratio wise.
The Kollmorgen one is good from MotionVillage, and there are many others.
Al.
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 06-11-2006, 09:28 AM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,825
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road

Jerking and banging noises makes me think of some kind of binding issues to do with the slides of the machine. This could mean the center of gravity of the head is too far off center of guide bearings that are too close together on the slideways. The amount of clearance that the bearings have could also be a concern: a little too much and they will lock easily due to the available tilt in the system with an offcentered load.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 06-12-2006, 09:09 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,319
NC Cams is on a distinguished road

We deal with accelerating and declerating mechanical systems with cams for a livelihood - and in systems without brakes or dampers.

Dealing with inertia - the ability of a body in motor or at rest to stay in that state - is a fundamental problem with ANY electro-mechanical system.

In your case, when you have the system moving UP, only the motor can apply force - all motor has to do is overcome gravity and friction from the force IT (motor) creates.

However, when system moves DOWN, it has to overcome the intertia of body and friction but now GRAVITY is adding to the speed factor, not subtracting from it as occurs when lifting.

First thing I'd try is to REDUCE the speed and/or acceleration factor of the motor during LOWERING operation if possible. Since gravity is "helping" you don't need motor to urge things along as quick or fast. IN effect, all motor has to do is brake at the desired position.

YOu might also try to counterbalance the system. This way, the upward force and downward force needed to move the system are closer match (garage doors move much smoother and quiter if the opener doesn't have to "lift" the entire door when the wind-up spring is adjusted properly).

You'd definitely want to reduce acceleration factor in a system with an external counterbalanced system. More inertia to control.

You'd be amazed at the applicability of the F=MA equation when it comes to understanding and solving problems like this....
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361