CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Electronics > Servo Motors and Drives


Servo Motors and Drives Discuss servo motors, drivers and other related topics here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 04-25-2011, 09:27 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 23
Jasonixo is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?
Geckodrives aren't rated high enough...

I need to drive the 112V 65A SEM Servos on my V2XT. I was looking at the Gecko G320X but it isn't rated high enough to run the servos at full rpm and torque. I am not familiar with any good alternative brands. I am planning on using a Smoothstepper USB M.C.I. in my retrofit. Any thoughts or experience with a setup like this? I am planning on replacing the encoders too.

Thanks!

Jason
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 04-25-2011, 09:34 PM
judleroy's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 406
judleroy is on a distinguished road

Viper Servo Motor control maybe?
Judleroy
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 04-26-2011, 05:52 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 22
cholder is on a distinguished road

I used Viper 250's on a Bridgeport R2E4 retrofit. They worked very well.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 04-26-2011, 02:28 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Steven Martin is on a distinguished road

We're looking at the Viper 200 for our R2E4 retrofit. Out of curiosity, what influenced you to select the 250? Also curious what control hardware/software you used.

Thanks,
Steve
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 04-26-2011, 03:27 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 22
cholder is on a distinguished road

I'm mistaken. They are 200's. At the time that was the only unit they had. I used a Bob Campbell breakout board and a MODIO board. I was going to use a smoothstepper as well, but they were out of stock when I started the project. I removed the manual backgear shifter and added a pneumatic unit and I also installed a VFD. When I was finished, the machine could run on single phase or three phase power. I also left the variable speed pulleys in place. I ran the feedrate override pot to the MODIO board. I also ran the variable speed pot and the VFD analog out to the MODIO board so I could do a rough spindle speed display. It also has a MPG running to the MODIO board. I removed the original CRT and closed the hole with enough structure to support a 15" LCD touchscreen.
The PC in the picture is a Dell GX260 running Mach3. The MODIO board was mounted in the enclosure behind the monitor.

I used Mouser Electronics 651-1688379 to connect the encoders. I kept the existing servo wiring in place. Some of the original encoder wires are quite large and that connector made it easy.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Mill1.jpg‎
Views:	111
Size:	126.9 KB
ID:	132584   Click image for larger version

Name:	mill4.jpg‎
Views:	146
Size:	172.8 KB
ID:	132585  
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 04-26-2011, 03:52 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Steven Martin is on a distinguished road

Thanks for all the detailed info!

The R2E4 in question belongs to the FIRST Robotics team I help Mentor. We were looking to replace the old Boss 9 control (it died) with the Viper 200's and a MicroKinetics motion control and MillMaster software.

Anyone looking for some Boss 9 boards? Got three good servo drivers and most other boards. Timing chip in the main CPU card seems to be the problem. Other diagnostics pass.
Steve
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 04-26-2011, 11:13 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 23
Jasonixo is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

The Viper 200 lists 170V, 42A Peak/20A Cont. The SEM Servos on my BP V2XT indicate 112V, Pulse Amps 65A. Does this indicate a torque problem?

Cholder- your retrofit is very interesting to me- I have a solenoid-controlled pneumatic vari-speed and spindle brake to either incorporate or replace with a VFD. It looks like you have a nice setup and one worthy of emulating. The Viper 200s look the most promising out of the drives I have come across.

As far as controller boards, I'm told the Smoothstepper will only run the servos like steppers, not with continuous DC that makes servos what they are. I'd love to use a USB Board but it looks like I need to scrounge up a computer with a parallel port. Any recommendations on a continuous DC servo breakout board?

Next can of worms- auxiliary functions. I need operate coolant, vari-speed, and spindle brake. If I can run the factory spindle systems now and install a VFD later without rebuilding the control, I'll be a happy button-pusher!

Thanks-

Jason
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 04-27-2011, 06:27 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 22
cholder is on a distinguished road

Jason,

I have not seen any torque issues. I don't think the original Bridgeport drives output 65 amps, that is just the motor rating.

You are correct in that the original servos were analog controlled, but the equipment sending the analog signal was taking in the encoder steps and deciding how to change the analog command, also in discrete steps. Using the Viper drives you have just placed the responsibily for deciding what the analog command should be on the drive and not in the PC. If I remember correctly the original Bridgport stepper systems at their best were 0.0005" per half step. The servos are 0.0001 per encoder step if you use the original encoders. The tuning of the drive is what ulimately makes the servo behave as it should. What I'm trying to say is that there is really nothing to be gained by trying to stay with an analog command system.

I have not used a smooth stepper board but it should work well with the Vipers. If you use the smooth stepper you do not need a parallel port, it is USB so it can be used with a laptop if desired. As far as I know the parallel port is only step and direction as well.

If you want true analog command you will need to go to a higher end motion control board and find software to support it.

The only real difference from the original equipment has to do with homing. The original equipment homed from the limit switch and the zero marker pulse from the encoder. I have not worked that out yet so my homing is limited to the repeatability of the switch. Which is OK for softlimits but not for a repeatable work offset at power up.

On a side note for you and Steve, Rutex offers a R2040 unit which would allow you to use the original Bridgeport drives. You would need to leave the tach signal going to the drive intact and run the encoder to this board. They generate +/-10V to command the drives. I don't want to take a sale from Viper, they are great drives, but it is another option. It was not available when I did this rework.

I left the variable speed pulley arrangment and added the VFD. I can now overspeed the spindle for small bits.

I used more hardwired control than I needed to on this machine but I had the switches and relays and would have had to add a PLC or another MODIO board otherwise. I have a reasonable schematic of this sytem if you are interested (No Warranty Implied or Expressed) send me your email.
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 04-27-2011, 06:35 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 23
Jasonixo is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

I looked through Mach3's plugins and I came across the DSPMC.

8-Axis Ethernet Motion Controller, Mach3 CNC Controller, .Net C# CSharp Library

If I went this route, does this determine the type of servo drive I use? Are there analog servo drives to go with analog controllers?

The more I research, the more I realize I know little about CNC systems!

Another I've come across- thoughts?

http://www.adlinktech.com/PD/web/PD_detail.php?pid=684

Last edited by Jasonixo; 04-27-2011 at 07:08 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 04-27-2011, 07:27 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 22
cholder is on a distinguished road

Jason,

Almost all servo drives can accept an analog command signal. If you use Mach3 the least expensive option is the parallel port with a step and direction servo. Most modern digital servos will also accept step and direction as well as analog but not all will accept both so you need to determine which drive you are going to use. If you are using the original Bridgeport DC servos (I'm familar with Boss 8 or 9) and the drives are in good shape you could use the Rutex 2040 to provide the analog command to the Bridgeport drives. This would work out to around $420 for 3 axis. If you use the Viper 200s it works out to around $660. You could change the encoders to get more pulses per revolution but I'm not sure you would see alot of difference in performance but it does step up the computer needed to drive it. You would most likely need to step up base frequency in the Mach3 in order to generate the faster pulse train which would require a fairly fast machine. The Ethernet Servo package you mentioned could provide the analog command for the Bridgeport Drives as well and it has a lot of I/O. I kept things fairly simple using the hardwired controls for spindle, coolant and backgear so I did not need alot of I/O. It gets simpler if you don't have the pneumatic backgear selector. The board you list will also provide analog command signals.

Cliff
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 04-28-2011, 06:33 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 23
Jasonixo is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Thanks Cliff-

So which component in the system determines the drive format (step/dir or analog)? The motion controller the servo drives, or both? Is one component more apt to handle either? For example, if I chose the DSPMC and the original drives, will that provide the original servos with a smooth analog feed and a mach3 capable system??

Regarding encoders, a higher resolution encoder equates to greater accuracy, correct? I'd rather achieve a high level of accuracy (for the machine) than high metal removal rates or movement speed.

Initially I looked at the packaged kits like Ajax and Mach Motion, then decided to look into scratch-building a retrofit. Now I'm concerned this is over my head and the extra money for the kit is warranted. Still, throwing someone else's IQ into my machine is against my nature and I want to learn more about these systems. I don't have the luxury of time to piddle endlessly with this thing. Cut chips need to arrive really need to arrive within the next month or so. Is it feasible to cobble this together and get running while learning the ropes?

Thanks-

Jason

Last edited by Jasonixo; 04-28-2011 at 06:59 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 04-28-2011, 06:46 PM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,544
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Have you looked at Kflop and Kanalog? these are PC/USB connected and together with the Dynamotion Kanalog board you have a fairly high I/O count PLC as well as ±10vdc analog ouputs.
The unit runs with the built in software also a Mach plug in is available.
BTW, it will run non-intelligent drives as the PID loop is tuned in the Dynamotion boards.
Al.
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.

Last edited by Al_The_Man; 04-28-2011 at 07:02 PM.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6 Geckodrives with 2 Rectifier Set Up? Sunmixed Gecko Drives 1 10-09-2010 09:55 AM
Newbie- Why 1/2 or 2/3 of rated current? daman Stepper Motors and Drives 14 09-21-2010 12:07 PM
Problem- KL34H2160-62-8A Specification Price: $179 ( in stock) Rated Current: 4.4A, Rated mattbesquare Automation Technology Products 15 08-11-2010 04:17 PM
Disable feature on Geckodrives technosteve DIY-CNC Router Table Machines 4 01-17-2009 10:00 PM
What Servo Motors to Buy to be Controlled by Geckodrives? waleed alhadidi Gecko Drives 0 09-16-2008 11:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361