CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Electronics > Rutex Products > Servo Drives


Servo Drives Discuss all Rutex servo drives and get direct support!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #13  
Old 05-30-2006, 06:31 PM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,544
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

The only problem in sizing the Cap/amp is that the percentage ripple will vary depending on the final DC voltage.
For an example, considering 200VDC at a current of 54amps (duty cycle figured in) for 28vp/p = 5% ripple, would require approx 2,600µfd on a three phase full wave supply.
IOW a 1000µfd cap on a 200vdc 1amp supply will be far less % ripple for the same capacitor on a 12v 1amp supply.
Al.
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
Reply With Quote

  #14   Ban this user!
Old 05-30-2006, 06:41 PM
Karl_T's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dassel,MN,USA
Posts: 1,318
Karl_T is on a distinguished road

Al,
How is it that you know so much? At least for the subjects I'm interested in, you allways seem to be the one with the answer.

Green with envy

Karl
Reply With Quote

  #15   Ban this user!
Old 05-31-2006, 05:32 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,319
NC Cams is on a distinguished road

Using the posted recommendations:
"...Rutex recommends 1000 uf per amp..."

and the given
"...30 amps per drive...",

the following relationship seems intuitively obvious:

1000 x 30 x N = cap needed

where N = numbers of drives

This would give a reasonable MINIMUM cap value - one could increase capacitance as one can afford. "Afford" is the keyword here as at 200wvdc, 30K of capacitance per drive is NOT going to be cheap.

I suspect the Rutex cap factor is based upon a typical single phase rectification assumption. Thus, the "30" factor can probably be 'derated' as chances are that one would never draw 30 amps simultaneously from all drives AND there will be less ripple due to 3 phase rectification. A reasonable SWAG derating would be 66%.

BTW: My Fanuc's run 3 phase SCR drives and the ONLY filtration is an inductor - there is NO capacitance WHATSOEVER on the DC side of the drive. Hence, volatage ripple is not insubstantial and they run just fine.

It should be noted however, that EACH drive is operating off of a SEPARATE transformer rather than a common AC buss feeding all the drives.

Keep in mind that DC motors running at 200v are going to be a bit less sensitive to ripple than a sensitive electronics sensing circuit operating at 5-12vdc.

Last edited by NC Cams; 05-31-2006 at 05:37 AM. Reason: fix typo
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #16  
Old 05-31-2006, 11:12 AM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,544
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by NC Cams
Using the posted recommendations:
"...Rutex recommends 1000 uf per amp..."


BTW: My Fanuc's run 3 phase SCR drives and the ONLY filtration is an inductor - there is NO capacitance WHATSOEVER on the DC side of the drive. Hence, volatage ripple is not insubstantial and they run just fine.

.
The feature of SCR drives is such that they do not need a Power supply, that is if you discount the 3 phase provided by the Power company.
You do not fit a capacitor between drive and motor, any more than you would fit a Cap. between a PWM output and the motor.
The incoming three phase (power supply) has to be kept pure AC in order for the SCR action to work in this mode.
So what does the Choke or inductance do to minimize ripple?
The choke is in series with the motor armature, if the DC resistance is measured it will probably be found to be less than 1ohm, but an inductance possesses something called Inductive Reactance (measure in Ohms) one of the values it is dependant on is frequency, in this case 3600hz ripple. As opposite to Capacitive reactance, the inductive reactance value increases with frequency.
The Inductive Reactance will appear to be in series with the DC resistance, (say in this case say 1000ohms).
So if you imagine 2 resistors in series with the motor and one is 0.5 ohms and the other 1000 ohms.
The DC portion of the SCR supplied power only sees the 0.5 ohms, but the ripple frequency 'sees' the total, 0.5+1000 ohms. So you can visualize the effect on each.
On the question of Capacitor sizing, if a guide of 1000µfd/amp is used, that is OK for one particular voltage if the object is to attain a certain % ripple.
For e.g. , if a 200v supply at 1 amp uses a 1000µfd cap. This will produce x% ripple.
If the same standard is used on a 24v 1amp supply and again 1000µfd is used the same p/p ripple will result but the percentage ripple will be magnified proportionately.
I have the full formula plugged into a spread sheet, I will dig it up and post it for reference.
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
Reply With Quote

  #17   Ban this user!
Old 06-01-2006, 10:52 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 71
najnielkp is on a distinguished road

thank you al and nc.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361