How are you interfacing the Fanuc AC commutation signals, as normally the Fanuc uses a proprietary commutation signal?
Al.
I am setting up my first CNC. I am using a PC with LinuxCNC and Mesa boards 5i25 and 7i77. I am using Fanuc AC servo motors powered by Allen Bradley Ultra series 100 servo drives.
I chose that Mesa board combo because it would allow me to have encoder feedback to the controller (as well as to the drive) for better control.
Now as far as actually wiring it up, I was planning to split the encoder signal at a terminal strip; one branch going to the servo drive (on connector J2), and one branch going to the Mesa board, like so:
http://www.cnczone.com/forums/attach...d=370906&stc=1 <== this is from the AB Ultra 100 manual and is fine to do per the manual
As I read the AB Ultra 100 manual, it describes an encoder output:
http://www.cnczone.com/forums/attach...d=370908&stc=1
So the encoder goes into the drive on J2, pulses divided (or not), and then sent out on J1 to the controller.
Which of these methods is best? Is there any advantage to using the encoder outputs on J1?
Similar Threads:
- Machdrives Dual Encoder Servo Drive Now Shipping!
- Problem- drdy signal is off in fanuc servo drive
- Need Help!- Need help trouble shooting Mitsubishi drive, servo motor, and encoder
- Need Help!- Mach3, DMM servo Drive Encoder hookup
- Flashcut CNC Servo Drive,signal gen,control pendant,limit switch harness
How are you interfacing the Fanuc AC commutation signals, as normally the Fanuc uses a proprietary commutation signal?
Al.
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Custom Machine Design
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
By piggybacking on the encoder lines I would be concerned about introducing noise into the system. I have always used the encoder output from the drive in any system I have put together. Never tried it the other way.
noise is bad
use good shielding and/or ferrites
there is more than one way to skin a cat, smoke em if you got em
In a good motion control card there is no real need for a intelligent drive, and the need for dual loop system.
A simple PWM drive can be used.
There is a member here that made a convertor for Fanuc servo's.
It is usually that or replacing the encoder.
Fanuc 4 bit shown converts to pseudo sine wave.
Al.
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Custom Machine Design
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
Are you saying the 5i25/7i77 is not a good motion control card? Or are you saying I can forego the encoder feedback to the card? Or am I missing the point?
The (intelligent?) AB Ultra 100 Servo drives are already in place and I have not budgeted to replace them. Should I consider replacing them in your opinion?
First I cannot comment on the Mesa as I have not used them, but from utube videos etc they appear to do a good job, I tend to always use ±10vdc analog drives which I believe these card will do.
And with a decent controller where the encoder goes back to the controller card, a simple drive such as the A-M-C, Copley etc can be used, these are simple torque mode (trans-conductance) drives.
This avoids expensive intelligent drives such as the AB which AFAIK requires software to set them up, parameters etc? And which entails tuning two loops.
If you already have them try commissioning them first before replacing.
Maybe the Linux forum may have someone who has used them.
Interesting to know how the Fanuc commutation was handled.
Also are they used as original 3 phase servo motors or BLDC with the AB drives?
Al.
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Custom Machine Design
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.