CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > CAM Software > PTC Pro/Manufacture


PTC Pro/Manufacture Discuss PTC Pro/Manufacture software here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 11-10-2008, 11:49 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 84
bartL is on a distinguished road
Pro/Welding

Hello,
I know this isn't the right place for this question, but there's no Pro/E forum in the CAD section. BTW Why not???
I'm trying to create some welds in a simple assembly with the pro/welding mode (licence). Now I would like to create a STEP file so I can use it in another program but I can't make the welds solid, it stays a surface between the welded parts. Does anybody here works with pro/welding and know how to do this?

Thanks,
Bart
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 11-26-2008, 06:42 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 36
JonasC is on a distinguished road

Hej Bart,

If you have a legit copy of ProE and especially a maintenance agreement you can find this info at ptc knowledgebase here:
https://www.ptc.com/appserver/cs/vie...?n=/123671.htm
If not, let me know and I'll give you the headlights.

BR, J
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 11-26-2008, 07:34 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 84
bartL is on a distinguished road

Jonas,
I don't have permission to login on the PTC site
So I wpuld be very thankfull if you can give me te headlines. I'm especially looking for some method to create realistic welds (if that's possible) which I can use for strength calculations in another program.
Thanks for the reply in the corner round thread.


Thanks in advance,
Bart
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 11-26-2008, 09:19 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 36
JonasC is on a distinguished road

ok, for this time I will cut&paste from ptc.com, but since I doubt they appreciate that it's this time only.

=======================================================

Description
-----------------
Possibility to show weld features as solids because they look like as surface features.

Alternate Technique
-----------------
In assembly mode create a new part and create a swept protrusion for example referencing edges from both connected parts.

Resolution
-----------------
Weld features are surface features and cannot be shown as solid features in generally.
Exception:
For cross section drawing views there is the possibility to set drawing setup option "weld_solid_xsec yes".

Further information can be found in TPI 102781 for the config.pro option hlr_for_quilts and TAN 111852 for the drawing setup option show_quilts_in_total_xsecs.

=======================================================

Which basically means, you can't do it in any simple way.
What you can do is simply reference the resulting curves and (re)model the weld as solids.

best of luck, Jonas
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 11-26-2008, 11:22 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 84
bartL is on a distinguished road

Jonas,
Thanks for this information.
Do you have any experience with one of these solutions?
I've tried to create parts in assembly mode before (which I think is the best way to create realistic welds) but it always says that I can't use references from parts in the assembly. If I can use references from other parts it would be much easier to create a sweep trough the model.

Thanks,
Bart
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 11-26-2008, 11:52 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 36
JonasC is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by bartL View Post
Jonas,
If I can use references from other parts it would be much easier to create a sweep trough the model.
Sure would!
ProE is set, default I think, to minimize external dependencies. I guess this is due to the fact that too many references back and forth might make your head spin. However, it's obvioulsy a very strong tool.

When in an assembly, go to 'Tools' / 'Assembly Setting' / 'Reference control'
Set it too 'All'.
Besides the option to reference other parts you now also have the option to merger several parts together into one single part. This can be done in many ways, but I think you want to look in the 'Insert' menu when in assembly mode.
First of all put an empty part into your assembly. Rightclick on it in the feature tree, and select activate. Now you can copy other parts into this from the 'Insert' menu. Pick 'Shared data' at the bottom and then 'Merge'. Other options are there as well so have a look at them.

good luck, J
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 11-26-2008, 02:32 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 84
bartL is on a distinguished road

Jonas,
Thanks again for this info.
Where are you using this merge function for? I've never used it since I'm working with pro/e daily for work for 1,5 year now.
Are you common with pro/e models used for strength calculations (like mechanica or another program)? I'm trying it for the first time now and it works pretty good. But now I'm trying to get a realistic fatigue lifetime calculation for welding assemblies and that seems to be very hard since you have to take account with lots of values like material properties and changes because of the temperature influence. Beside that a realistic model is very important too, and even that seems to be quit a job to get it correct.

Thanks,
Bart
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 11-26-2008, 02:57 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 36
JonasC is on a distinguished road

Bart,
np, glad to help.
About the merge function, it can be used for various tasks. What comes to mind as I'm writing this is to simplify an assembly into 1 single part, for analysis or similar. In some design tasks you can benefit from doing the target part as a merged part. I use it pretty often but I can't really tell for what becuase it's different from time to time.
It's opposite is the 'cut out' operation which is basically a boolean operation subtracting one(or several) piece(s) from another.

About the strength calculation, ye, I've worked some with Mechanica. Wouldn't call myself an expert maybe more of a somewhat advanced user. Also been playing around some with Abaqus and Ansys.
Fatique calculations have I never done though. There seem to be so many pitfalls in that area so I leave that to the ppl doing calculations for a living

Been using ProE (almost) daily for 9 years now btw....

/jonas
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 11-26-2008, 03:35 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 84
bartL is on a distinguished road

Aha,
It seems we can't use that merge function in the company I'm working for because we are always working with the complete set of production drawings in the factory. In other words every assembly stays an assembly with the 'child' parts attached to it so everyone who has the permission can see how the assembly is build. Beside that the whole structure of the machine is in our PLM system and is linked with some other calculation programs, so it is neccesary that every single part is in that structure. The only thing we could use it for is converting a welding assembly in a casting part. That makes an assembly become a part. Mostly when I do that I simply save a copy as an IGES and open it as a part, then save again.

I've never worked with mechanica but I've heard it's quit a strong application. I'm working with ANSYS which is the best FEM analysis sofware in my opinion, but as I've said before it's a pain to get a good welding assembly in ansys, since I want a realistic weld which is even a bit in both parts (the notch).

Hopefully I'll find a good solution to create those kind of parts in an easier way.

Thanks,
Bart
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TIG welding Steel/Iron welding with Argon? Rich05 Welding, Brazing, Soldering, Sealing 9 12-01-2007 08:11 PM
RPC & welding machines millman52 Phase Converters and VFD 9 04-18-2007 01:35 AM
New to TIG welding johnsguns1 Welding, Brazing, Soldering, Sealing 10 03-01-2007 07:56 PM
Welding a Gap Hellbringer General Metal Working Machines 12 06-06-2006 12:50 PM
welding jig georgebarr Welding, Brazing, Soldering, Sealing 2 05-23-2004 07:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353