View Poll Results: How much would you pay for a decent pendant kit? (with button and MPG inputs, etc)

Voters
125. You may not vote on this poll
  • $0-$50

    19 15.20%
  • $50-$75

    41 32.80%
  • $75-$125

    31 24.80%
  • $125+

    25 20.00%
  • I'd assemble it myself

    44 35.20%
  • I'd want an assembled unit

    17 13.60%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 40

Thread: Poll: Pendant Kit

  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Poll: Pendant Kit

    Hi All,
    I'm thinking of putting together a pendant kit for the DIY guys. I'm building my second pendant for one of my machines and it wouldn't be too hard to start making a kit. I'm wanting to get a feel for what anyone would pay and if they'd want it assembled or would rather assemble it themselves. By "kit" and "assemble", I'm referring to a PCB with components, NOT the actual pendant itself.
    Thanks!
    -G.M.M.
    Last edited by GeckoMachineMan; 11-16-2007 at 03:17 AM. Reason: clarification


  2. #2
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    24
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Do you have pics and specs of what you are making?


  3. #3
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Sorry, not yet. Still trying to determine if I should turn what I've already done for one, into something viable for a kit. I'm open to feature suggestions at this point.

    Here is what I can give you though as far as what I have done for my first pendant:
    (I needed something simpler than most)
    1) one MPG with 4 buttons for axis select
    2) 4 generic buttons for mapping to whatever
    3) feedrate override potentiometer input
    4) 3-position switch for MPG step size selection
    5) E-Stop button input

    Something like this in a kit form wouldn't cost very much and I could easily scale it up to be something bigger, or several intermediate versions with varying capabilities.

    I'm also working on a tach which I could kit if that's of interest as well.


  4. #4
    Registered Rally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    203
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    CNC without a Pendant IMHO is worthless. If someone can build a Pendant It would be worth more than $200 to me!!
    But that is just my oppinion!


  • #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Rally,
    Thanks, I'm open to all opinions.

    Currently, I'm structuring my second pendant around USB (HID) and using Mach 3's KeyGrabber. I'm going to try and keep development ideas around this approach, as USB is pretty standard on anything these days.

    How many generic button inputs would you all prefer to see? So far, not counting the 4 axis select buttons that I group along with the MPG, I use 8 (4 for whatever, 3 for the MPG step selection switch and 1 for the e-stop). I guess a follow up question is, would you like to see a range of models with different capabilities (for instance, one 8-button model with single MPG, one 16-button one with dual MPG, etc)? I'm at the planning stages here and I'm just trying to get the feel for what people would want feature-wise.


  • #6
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,147
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    here is what i want...

    A USB device that has analog and digital inputs, and some example files on how to use it with Mach.. Essentially a MODIO type of device, but i think it really should be like $35.00 or so.. It only needs to be simple, right? Get input data into mach? rs232 might be OK also.

    May i recommend something like.. a 40 pin MCU, with the resulting 32ish inputs... This is nice and flexible.

    For me, the thing worth spending $ on would be 'templates' or other materials to make integrating it into mach3 go easily.. Lots of flexibility could be had that way.

    Sort of a developers kit with working examples is what i am describing. I would pay upto $50 for this. I do not know how popular this product may be.

    This is the device i would purchase, if any... the rest is just stuffing a control box...
    Design & Development
    My Portfolio: www.robertguyser.com | CAD Blog I Contribute to: http://www.jeffcad.info


  • #7
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Vacpress,
    Thanks for your input. I was already working on part of it using a 40-pin ATMega MCU, which does not result in 32 pins free (things such as USB will take some pins, etc) but is very close. I am also looking at making 2 different versions (expanded capabilities on the second for more stuff). In my opinion, something like the ModIO is a bit too expensive and a little excessive for the average pendant. I'm also not a fan of Modbus, USB is much more up-to-date. I appreciate the input, all are welcome to chime in. Vacpress has given me a good direction to start in.
    -GMM


  • #8
    Gold Member mxtras's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,810
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I have definately been looking for a good pendant.

    What I would like to see is:

    Pendant on/off (for jog functions)

    Cycle Start
    Pause
    Cycle Stop
    E-stop

    Feedrate Override Pot or incremental buttons

    Spindle Speed Override Pot or incremental buttons

    Complete Jog control (as you mentioned) for four axis

    Remote position display (a nice, fluffy option!)

    Coolant toggle
    Mist toggle

    At least eight+ user definable inputs

    Price? If it was layed out logically, could be used (for the most part in jog mode at least) with one hand I would be willing to part with maybe $150 easily.

    Scott
    Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.


  • #9
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    183
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I just bult myself a pendant using a pic and usb, i opted for bulk transfer and using the mach sdk directly much faster.


    On to machine #3


    Quote Originally Posted by GeckoMachineMan View Post
    Rally,
    Thanks, I'm open to all opinions.

    Currently, I'm structuring my second pendant around USB (HID) and using Mach 3's KeyGrabber. I'm going to try and keep development ideas around this approach, as USB is pretty standard on anything these days.

    How many generic button inputs would you all prefer to see? So far, not counting the 4 axis select buttons that I group along with the MPG, I use 8 (4 for whatever, 3 for the MPG step selection switch and 1 for the e-stop). I guess a follow up question is, would you like to see a range of models with different capabilities (for instance, one 8-button model with single MPG, one 16-button one with dual MPG, etc)? I'm at the planning stages here and I'm just trying to get the feel for what people would want feature-wise.


  • #10
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    elogicca,
    Thanks for your input. I'm trying to keep it HID-based so it's easier for the end-user. Keygrabber is very straightforward to program and also eliminates development time for me working using the SDK. I am thinking of incorporating the LCD onto the enhanced model, as yours or the ModIO supports. The only difference is that I'm doing some tests using a graphical LCD (GLCD) instead of a character-based one. I am thinking the basic pendant kit will be mostly inputs (like vacpress wants). For users like mxtras, the "fluffy" display option would be on a bit more enhanced, second model.
    Keep it comin'...
    -GMM


  • #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    183
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    The sdk is really easy and you could make a user config screen to set the ins and outs. I got a graphic lcd but it's reserved for another project

    For mpg's the sdk is much better...


  • #12
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    elogicca,
    Thanks, I'll take a closer look at it. It's definitely going to have to be used on a higher-end model with the LCD and what not. I'll look into it here momentarily.
    -GMM


  • Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. IH accuracy poll
      By carlquib in forum Industrial Hobbies (Support forum)
      Replies: 7
      Last Post: 02-12-2007, 01:15 AM
    2. poll test
      By daking in forum Test Forum
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 05-11-2006, 09:01 PM
    3. Poll
      By Klox in forum BobCad-Cam
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: 07-16-2003, 10:43 AM
    4. Poll
      By Klox in forum BobCad-Cam
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 07-16-2003, 10:29 AM

    Posting Permissions


     


    About CNCzone.com

      We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

    Follow us on

    Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.