CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Electronics > PicStep Controllers


PicStep Controllers Discuss PicStep Controllers here!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 07-24-2006, 11:27 AM
Garfield2's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 232
Garfield2 is on a distinguished road
New PICStep firmware available

PICStep now has a V2.0 firmware available.

It has a new 1/16 mode (1/16, 1/8, 1/4 and 1/2, lost full), a 5 1/2 minute auto shutdown and the direction line bug fix.

The motor should sound exactly the same in either direction.

http://www.fromorbit.com/projects/picstep/

Alan.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 07-24-2006, 11:32 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Romania
Posts: 339
zoltan is on a distinguished road

Thank you.

Zoltan
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 10-01-2006, 08:33 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 183
elogicca is on a distinguished road

Where is the v.2 software listed on the site? all i can see is v1.1
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 10-02-2006, 02:11 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: US
Posts: 17
opcode1300 is on a distinguished road

PICStep gets 1/16 stepping and a bug fix! 25/07/06
After deciphering what RadekCX from the Czech Republic was on about in numerous hard to understand posts on CNCZone, I finally figure out what he was talking about. He had found a bug in the firmware that was caused by a bug in the LMD18245 datasheet.

The LMD will not switch correctly if the direction of the energy flowing through the coil changes before the LMD DAC is told to go to 0 (it must be 0 before the direction change). A tweak of the firmware and some tidy-ups and this issue is now resolved. The motor should sound exactly the same in both directions of rotation (and may have less resonance at high speed).

I've also added 1/16 stepping because I was rewritting the DAC tables anyhow and it seems like a nice little upgrade. The mode switches now select from 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 and 1/16. So if you liked the 1/8 mode you will need to adjust you mode settings to keep it as it will now be 1/16 otherwise.

Also I've made two versions for the compiled HEX files. One with the auto 5 1/2 minute shutdown and one without for those that hated the shutdown feature.

Let me know if you find any more bugs!

* NEW Firmware V2.0 20MHz - Sources + HEX
* NEW Firmware V2.0 (No auto timeout) 20MHz - Sources + HEX
i think something happened to his hosting.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 10-02-2006, 02:53 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 183
elogicca is on a distinguished road

Cool thanks,

What setting is torque compensation on? 1/2 step?
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 10-06-2006, 03:15 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 45
tfmacz is on a distinguished road

A while back I ran into an issue with the 16F628A not programing properly.
I don't remember the issue. We were using firmware designed for the 16F627 as I recall and there was something different about the 16F628A that would not work.
Does this code work in the current 16F628A? Microchip is only offering samples on the A versions of the pdip package.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 10-06-2006, 03:17 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 183
elogicca is on a distinguished road

I'm currently running the 2.0 firmware on my 16F628A didn't have any programming issues, using mplab icd2
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 10-08-2006, 05:30 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 45
tfmacz is on a distinguished road

I do not seem to be able to get it to change micro step mode???
The jumpers hace no effect???

In the source there is only one dac table for 1/16 mode

I really need this thing to 1/4 step.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 10-09-2006, 02:18 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Serbia
Posts: 20
kodalo is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by tfmacz View Post
I do not seem to be able to get it to change micro step mode???
The jumpers hace no effect???

In the source there is only one dac table for 1/16 mode

I really need this thing to 1/4 step.
Did you try manualu, step-by-step? If using GCODE speed can be to fast to see difference, but with jog difference is so obviously.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 10-09-2006, 02:07 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 45
tfmacz is on a distinguished road
Smile Non Auto Timeout Version BRoken???

If the drive is in the correct mode a move of one inch should result in the same number of revolutions as the pitch of the lead screw and the carradge should move one inch.

on this machine a 1 inch move should result in 10 revolutins of the lead screw. I was only getting 2 1/2 revs.

As it turns out I was trying the "Non Auto Timeout" version. I tried the "Auto Timeout" version and it works properly, so possibly the "Non Auto Timeout" version is broken.

Thanks for your suggeston though.

Ted
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 10-09-2006, 05:34 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Serbia
Posts: 20
kodalo is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by tfmacz View Post
If the drive is in the correct mode a move of one inch should result in the same number of revolutions as the pitch of the lead screw and the carradge should move one inch.

on this machine a 1 inch move should result in 10 revolutins of the lead screw. I was only getting 2 1/2 revs.

As it turns out I was trying the "Non Auto Timeout" version. I tried the "Auto Timeout" version and it works properly, so possibly the "Non Auto Timeout" version is broken.

Thanks for your suggeston though.

Ted
Yes, I just tried with "Non Auto Timeout" and it didn't work. I.e. works, but has only one mode - 1/16 and jumpers has no effects.
ASM codes are the same for both SW, except line 23 #define TIMEOUT_ENABLED and it is normal.
In any case, I like "Auto Timeoutcode", but I will be really happy if Alan will be so kindly to tell me how to change timeout from 5.1/2 minutes. I didn't know assembler well so I can't find "magic value" in code.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 10-09-2006, 06:03 PM
Garfield2's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 232
Garfield2 is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by kodalo View Post
Yes, I just tried with "Non Auto Timeout" and it didn't work. I.e. works, but has only one mode - 1/16 and jumpers has no effects.
ASM codes are the same for both SW, except line 23 #define TIMEOUT_ENABLED and it is normal.
I'll have a look at that, the defines are probably hiding something they're not suppose too. Since I never use the non-timeout version I don't really test it to fully

Originally Posted by kodalo View Post
In any case, I like "Auto Timeoutcode", but I will be really happy if Alan will be so kindly to tell me how to change timeout from 5.1/2 minutes. I didn't know assembler well so I can't find "magic value" in code.
It's done using the 16 bit TMR and a few overflow registers. There isn't really a magic number to keep the code fast.

Code:
	incf		timeout_reg, f		; Increase the timeout reg value

	btfss		timeout_reg, 2  	; Check we've been around the 4 times of the 16 bit counter (~5 minutes 45 seconds @ 20MHz)
	  goto		Loop
Comment out these lines to reduce the timeout to like 70secs or change "timeout_reg, 2" to some other bit field number (ie. 0-7) to increase the time. Experimentation is the key (else crack out the calculator and use the number of instructions versus the clock frequency to get an exact time)

-A.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353