Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 33

Thread: lmd18245 or sla7051m

  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    111
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    lmd18245 or sla7051m

    Has anyone designed a driver with either the national lmd18425 or the allegro sla7051m, i have sets of both and was wandering if it is worth the time and effort to build a driver board for one of them.


  2. #2
    Registered santiniuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    U.K - England
    Posts
    389
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I can recommend Alan's Picstep boards for the LMD18245 I.C's.

    It uses a Microchip Pic16F628A and a handful of discrete components.
    Works a treat.

    Details at :-

    http://www.fromorbit.com/projects/picstep/

    Good luck.


  3. #3
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1460
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    The 18245 is a better chip if cost is no issue. It is bipolar and support microstepping.
    You will need two of them per motor.

    I will be testing an AVR based chopper circuit similar to the 7051, shortly.


  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    111
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Yeah i found that out about the lmd18245 chips, i guess i should have looked at them harder. I think i will focus a design on the 7051 chips or go with one of the open source boards. For now i will stay away from a pic driven board. I would like to build a board per axis and then use a pic18f452 to control everything from the com port or usb if i get a chance but thats all later. Maybe next winter. As for now i just want to get some boards done for the new steppers i have. Build my bigger router and go from there. As it is bitterly cold out right now i am more interested in doing indoor electronics type stuff rather then outdoor wood cutting router building type stuff. Thanx.


  • #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    71
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Definitely go with the lmd18245 if you can afford it. The lmd18245 is much better at dissipating the heat. It has better specs and can withstand 6amp surges. It has a 12-15amp burst rating as well. Here is our designs, very reliable.

    http://www.embeddedtronics.com/microstep.html
    http://www.embeddedtronics.com/microsteppld.html

    Not open source but the code is posted as well as the schematic, design is proven. Boards are professionally done and are available if you find it too much of a bother to layout your own.

    Kin Fong
    http://www.embeddedtronics.com/
    Robotics, CNC, and Controllers


  • #6
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    172
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Yup like they said, the LMD chip is real nice. I built the PicStep boards and they are working great. Do a search on here for PicStep and you'll see what I mean.


  • #7
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    111
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Actually i just got some lmd18245 chips in the mail. Problem is in my infinite wisdom i only ordered 3. Well i will work on the 7051 board design for now. I designed a board last night for the 7051 chips. But i need to trouble shoot any problems before i make anymore. I've actually looked at both picstep board and the embedded board. Both are very nice designs. Basically i am looking at building a controller that uses the pic18f452 and then seperate boards per axis. What the driver chips or arangements will be i don't know. Basically i'm reinventing the wheel and hoping to learn how it all works in the end. One thing i need to look at is either building or buying a pic programmer. But for now i will work on the board layouts and try and get my small router to work cutting pcb's. H500 keep me apprised of your board design. I have only played around with pic micro stuff but i have heard alot of good things about the AVR's.


  • #8
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    172
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TinkerDJ
    I have only played around with pic micro stuff but i have heard alot of good things about the AVR's.

    I have used PIC's for a long time now and I am biased towards them. They have never let me down yet in terms of power and speed. Their website offers a wealth of knowledge and support is great.


  • #9
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    111
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    My absolute favourite part of using pics is that they will give samples. I blew a pic with my last board design. So i need another programmer. I haven't even tried any AVR stuff yet. But the robot community seem to really like them. But i am keeping my options open and making a stable board that will work is mostly what i am trying to accomplish.


  • #10
    Registered pminmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    St. Peters, Mo USA
    Posts
    3325
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Atmel is pretty good about samples also. Three years ago when I was looking to get back into micro's, I originally looked to go with the PIC's or an updated version of the 8751 family, then I got a hold of some AVR literature. At that time the PIC's only had 8 bit a-d's and the AVR's had 10bit a-d's. When I found BASCOM's 2K basic compilier was free with an integrated development tools, I went the AVR route. I've never looked back. There is one part of the AVR family I feel is missing, a 14 pin DIP part. You jump from 8 pins to 20 pins. For example, a simple unipolar driver with 4 ouput drive lines a step and direction input will fit their 8 pin parts, but if you want an input for enable you have to jump to the 20 pin part. There not expensive $2, but would like the smaller foot print.

    Phil


  • #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    111
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Through some of the web sites there are plus and minus's for all the micro controllers, basically every manufacture has one. I'm not pro pic or anti avr just inexperienced. I do have some knoledge of C programming is there a C programmer for AVR, i have one for pic's.


  • #12
    Registered pminmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    St. Peters, Mo USA
    Posts
    3325
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    A good starting point for avr's:
    http://www.avrfreaks.org/
    Free compiler:
    http://www.avrfreaks.org/AVRGCC/

    Phil


  • Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

    Posting Permissions



    About CNCzone.com

      We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

    Follow us on

    Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.