CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > OpenSource CNC Design Center > Open Source Controller Boards


Open Source Controller Boards Discussion for Open Source CNC type Controller Boards and other related items. (for personal use only)


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 03-14-2006, 04:05 PM
sdantonio's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 904
sdantonio is on a distinguished road
80V board

Hi,

I have this huge set of motors (425in-oz) that are rated at 4VDC, 2.8A. I have been told that using a 3977 based driver (35VDC max) I will not get the best efficiency out of them. I was originally planning to run them off of a 3977 based driver with a 28VDC, 25A power supply. I am told they should be run at 4 to 20 times rated voltage which would put them somewhere between 16 to 80VDC.

The highest rated board in Phils website is listed at 55VDC (I believe it is LM-279 based if I remember right) and it is suggested that it be run at 35V unless you "add some extra EMF shielding". Gecko makes boards rated between 24 to 80VDC which sound like the right range to me.

Does anyone have a schematic and PCB layout for a board that will run 24 to 80VDC? And what extra EMF shielding would be required?

Thanks
Steven
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 03-14-2006, 05:11 PM
pminmo's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Peters, Mo USA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,325
pminmo is on a distinguished road

Alan's PicStep board would be a pretty good choice for your application, although I wouldn't recommend running it at 55V, becuase your motors will produce some back emf. Enclose the boards and electronics in a metal enclosure and you should be ok.

At 40V you would b 10 times the coil rating and will get pretty decent performance, not Gecko quality, but you wouldn't have Gecko dollars in it either.
__________________
Phil, Still too many interests, too many projects, and not enough time!!!!!!!!
Vist my websites - http://pminmo.com & http://millpcbs.com
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 03-14-2006, 05:12 PM
pminmo's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Peters, Mo USA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,325
pminmo is on a distinguished road

I should have asked, how many wires are the motor? 4,5,6,8?
__________________
Phil, Still too many interests, too many projects, and not enough time!!!!!!!!
Vist my websites - http://pminmo.com & http://millpcbs.com
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 03-14-2006, 06:12 PM
sdantonio's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 904
sdantonio is on a distinguished road

Hi Phil,

Thank you. The motors are 4 wire, which I believe would make them strictly bipolar. Would your BOB still be the thing to inerface the boards and the computer with? And how sensitive are the LM-279 chips to solder? How are you doing with the board I sent you, is it at all workable or were the lines to thin as I was worried about?

Steven
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 03-14-2006, 08:35 PM
pminmo's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Peters, Mo USA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,325
pminmo is on a distinguished road

Steven,
Que me in ot the board. I've worked/working with several? ST l297/298 are easy to solder. 3977's not so easy. 4 wire stricktly bipolar. Cheapest way is a db25 connector and wires. Easiest way for one of the boards on my website is the interface board.
__________________
Phil, Still too many interests, too many projects, and not enough time!!!!!!!!
Vist my websites - http://pminmo.com & http://millpcbs.com
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 03-14-2006, 09:49 PM
sdantonio's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 904
sdantonio is on a distinguished road

Hi Phil,

the board in question is the 12605 optoisolated BOB. You sent me all the PDF files and then you reworked the copper layout because one of the grouping of lines were to close together to resolve with toner transfer etching.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 03-15-2006, 03:56 PM
pminmo's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Peters, Mo USA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,325
pminmo is on a distinguished road

Steven,
The board is 90percent assembled. Missing a few parts. But so far things look good.
__________________
Phil, Still too many interests, too many projects, and not enough time!!!!!!!!
Vist my websites - http://pminmo.com & http://millpcbs.com
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 03-15-2006, 06:40 PM
sdantonio's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 904
sdantonio is on a distinguished road

Hi Phil,

Great, do you have a build sequence and any test points? or should I just assemble the whole thing and hope for the best? Actually when it's done if I can plug it into the computer and then measure a few voltages off of it generated by a Mach3 test program that would be really cool.

Is it going to be compatable with the Alans PicStep?

The LM-279 have a rating of 3A max. My motors have a rating of 2.8A. So I basically I have a choice of setting up the board at 3A or 2.5A (unless I can find a bunch of 7.1K resistors). In one case I hit the chips with their max current. In the other case I loose about 50 in-oz torque. Any sugestions on which value is best to choose?

Steven
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 03-16-2006, 09:22 AM
sdantonio's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 904
sdantonio is on a distinguished road

The LM-279 have a rating of 3A max. My motors have a rating of 2.8A. So I basically I have a choice of setting up the board at 3A or 2.5A (unless I can find a bunch of 7.1K resistors). In one case I hit the chips with their max current. In the other case I loose about 50 in-oz torque. Any sugestions on which value is best to choose?
Never mind, I found a resistor that will give 2.7A. Best of both worlds I think. Protects the motor and the LM-297 chip, and I only loose about 20 in-oz torque.

Still need to know about the compatability issue between the two boards when you get the chance.

Thanks
Steven
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 03-16-2006, 09:25 AM
sdantonio's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 904
sdantonio is on a distinguished road

Phil,

If you eveer find those resistor networks that we couldn't find in digikey or mouser (I think they were the 4 X 330 ohm or something like that... the files I got from you are at home), please let me know and I'll buy a few off you.

Otherwise I'll just pigtail a few single resistors together.

Steven
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 03-16-2006, 04:13 PM
pminmo's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Peters, Mo USA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,325
pminmo is on a distinguished road

steve,
Hope to give you an update in a few days. Which version of the picstep? I do have the sips, btw.
__________________
Phil, Still too many interests, too many projects, and not enough time!!!!!!!!
Vist my websites - http://pminmo.com & http://millpcbs.com
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 03-17-2006, 09:28 AM
sdantonio's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 904
sdantonio is on a distinguished road

Hi Phil,

I downloaded and bought parts for picstep v4.0. But I haven't made the boards yet, since most of the parts are the same I could go picstep v3.1 if you think that would be a better match for the optoboard.

Steven
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361