CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > OpenSource CNC Design Center > Open Source Controller Boards


Open Source Controller Boards Discussion for Open Source CNC type Controller Boards and other related items. (for personal use only)


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 12-29-2011, 11:50 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: BC
Posts: 10
Dude22 is on a distinguished road
Exclamation NEED HELP with uln2003 stepper controller

I am going to be using a uln2003 to as a controller for a stepper motor, interfaced through a computers parallel port, here is a like to the website that I am using for instructions: Easy To Build Stepper Controller from Recycled Materials | colvins.ca the circuit layout can be found here:

http://www.instructables.com/files/d...M4W.MEDIUM.jpg

This system can be used in place of an expensive stepper controller, the only problem is that the chip will only support up to 500ma, any more then this and the chip blows up.

My question is, would it be possible (possibly using ideal diodes) to supply the chip with a low amperage power supply and to supply the motors with a higher amperage using a separate power supply. Any words of wisdom or ideas would be great!!!

Thanks,
Joshua
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 12-30-2011, 01:47 AM
doorknob's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,240
doorknob is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by Dude22 View Post

My question is, would it be possible (possibly using ideal diodes) to supply the chip with a low amperage power supply and to supply the motors with a higher amperage using a separate power supply. Any words of wisdom or ideas would be great!!!
If I am understanding your question correctly, then I believe that the answer is "no".

The current flowing through each motor winding also must flow through the corresponding output transistor. There is no "chip" output current supply that is separate from the motor winding current.

The ULN2003 datasheet at http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/data.../489337_DS.pdf does allude to the possibility of paralleling two (or more) of the transistors in the package to handle a higher output current. You do have to observe the maximum device dissipation rating, though. There are three unused transistors in the package, but that is not quite enough to double-up on each output.

Alternatively, you could drive some higher-current output transistors from the ULN2003 outputs, but if you're going to go to the trouble of adding supplemental output transistors, then you might as well not even use the ULN2003 to begin with, and simply use discrete darlington transistors that are rated to handle a higher current to drive the motor windings (don't forget the diodes to handle the back emf).
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2012, 03:13 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: BC
Posts: 10
Dude22 is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by doorknob View Post
If I am understanding your question correctly, then I believe that the answer is "no".

The current flowing through each motor winding also must flow through the corresponding output transistor. There is no "chip" output current supply that is separate from the motor winding current.

The ULN2003 datasheet at http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/data.../489337_DS.pdf does allude to the possibility of paralleling two (or more) of the transistors in the package to handle a higher output current. You do have to observe the maximum device dissipation rating, though. There are three unused transistors in the package, but that is not quite enough to double-up on each output.

Alternatively, you could drive some higher-current output transistors from the ULN2003 outputs, but if you're going to go to the trouble of adding supplemental output transistors, then you might as well not even use the ULN2003 to begin with, and simply use discrete darlington transistors that are rated to handle a higher current to drive the motor windings (don't forget the diodes to handle the back emf).
I am interested in what you mentioned about paralleling, does that mean stacking the chips and soldering the corresponding tabs of the chip to each other???
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2012, 04:29 PM
doorknob's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,240
doorknob is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

While I believe that you could stack one directly on top of another and solder the corresponding pins together, that would be, if you will excuse the expression, a pretty ugly way to do it.

The downside to doing it that way would be that if one of them were defective, you would probably have to replace both of them together, and also you would probably have to derate the allowable power dissipation per IC package if they were directly adjacent to one another, because the package cooling would suffer by stacking them tightly together.

A better way to do it would probably be to have the two chips side by side with jumper wires or pc board circuit traces connecting the like pins. As an alternative, you could possibly solder together the corresponding input and output pins of adjacent drivers within a single package (but since there are only 7 drivers in the IC package you wouldn't have enough to double up on all 4 in a single package, and anyways the two-chip solution would probably be better able to dissipate additional power if that were a concern).
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2012, 07:33 PM
john_100's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 415
john_100 is on a distinguished road

Hi Dude22 ,

have you had a look at the ULN2803 octal darlington transistor array ?

with 8 transistors inside , one IC you could switch upto a 1A motor current

what is the motor voltage and current you need to control ?


John
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 03-18-2012, 10:02 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: BC
Posts: 10
Dude22 is on a distinguished road

Thanks for the link, it looks like those chips would work although it is cheaper to use 2 uln2003's as they are about 30 cents each.

PS: I tried paralelling them and it worked GREAT!!!
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 03-21-2012, 07:58 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 2
djnexxus is on a distinguished road

Hey guy's I'd like to ask what program you are using to run the cnc using the 2003 circuit? can Mach3 be configured to use it?
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 03-21-2012, 11:19 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: BC
Posts: 10
Dude22 is on a distinguished road
Smile

Originally Posted by djnexxus View Post
Hey guy's I'd like to ask what program you are using to run the cnc using the 2003 circuit? can Mach3 be configured to use it?
I use TURBO CNC, here is the link: DAK Engineering - TurboCNC Download I heighly recomend it (and it is FREE!!!) It runs in dos and despite what is says on the website it REQUIRES that it be run in a Windows 98 machiene in Ms Dos Mode. Here is a link to another website that will help you getting TURBO CNC set up with the uln2003: Easy To Build Stepper Controller from Recycled Materials | colvins.ca I would heighly recomend paralelling the uln2003's atlease one time. One chip by it self can take 50 volts at 500 mA 2 chips paralelled can take 100 volts at 1000ma and so on. The voltage isnt that important because 50 volts is MORE then enough but the amperage increace is vital when you are running from any "normal" power supply as if you break the limet of the chip then it will start smoking..... NOT GOOD If you have any questions please feel free to ask!!!
Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
controller, stepper, uln2003




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ULN2003 to run at bigger amp same79 General Electronics Discussion 1 01-12-2011 05:29 PM
Unipolar stepper motor with ULN2003? musicworld1 General Electronics Discussion 7 08-24-2010 07:23 AM
Two Input ULN2003 Circuit w102acd Stepper Motors and Drives 18 02-19-2008 12:47 PM
Uln2003 ipodman1991 General Electronics Discussion 2 12-03-2006 11:54 AM
stepper controller...need help DragnsBane General Electronics Discussion 2 09-10-2004 09:49 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361