CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > OpenSource CNC Design Center > Open Source Controller Boards


Open Source Controller Boards Discussion for Open Source CNC type Controller Boards and other related items. (for personal use only)


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 10-23-2005, 09:49 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2
amuron is on a distinguished road
Curious as to why the mixed technology on 3977

I took a look at a few of the designs, just found the site, its pretty cool. In a past career, I designed controllers, back when decent margins still existed. While it would be cheaper just to buy an assembled unit, there is nothing like the understanding one gets from diy, and its been a long time since I had my hand in the game, so it would be a cool educational experience.

One thing bugged me. Every 3977 design I looked at, mixed through hole and SMD, and the schmidit triggers were socketed. Since I hate drilling holes, and am not a big fan of hand soldering, ( I use a frying pan for reflow), I'm just wondering what the reason was for mixing SMD and all those through hole parts. Sure, if I was building 1 controller, I guess it would be fine, but I've got a number of ideas, so I might want to make up 12 boards. At that point, I think it might be faster to layout a board using SMD parts to make assembly easier. However, if I have missed something and there is one already done, there is no point in dupicating effort. More importantly, if there is a technical reason why not to, I'd sure like to know.

Thanks
Ron
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 10-23-2005, 02:43 PM
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 53
philba is on a distinguished road

I'm a SMD bigot or perhaps better put, a "TH phobe". Especially when making my own boards. Some stuff doesn't come in SMD versions: large electrolytics, terminal blocks, .1" pin headers, .... Also, some things in SMD cost more - like sense resistors. I've made a lot of boards and have never done a truely 100% SMD board. The good news is you can get the number of holes down to a mere handfull.

Phil
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 10-23-2005, 05:12 PM
greybeard's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Age: 73
Posts: 1,346
greybeard is on a distinguished road

I've always been used to working on a small scale, and am pretty good with a small iron. But I've never tried smd components, and as Iwill be making my own boards, single sided will be the prefered option.
Any advice or tips on technique would be very helpful.
Thanks
John
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 10-23-2005, 05:46 PM
pminmo's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Peters, Mo USA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,325
pminmo is on a distinguished road

amuron,
I assume your referring to the ones on my website? The socket on the hc14 is always optional. On some of my designs I use an sioc part. The mix of smd and thru hole is just how it happens most of the time for me. If your trying to accomplish something in a single sided version, sometimes the thruhole approach makes fewer jumpers. I mean to run a trace between pin's on an sioc part is a tough sell to most DIY pcb people. Also it many times has to do with parts on hand or cost. To go any smaller than 1206 packages is just to small for my hands and eyes. As I build up a stock of smd parts I use them more and more.
__________________
Phil, Still too many interests, too many projects, and not enough time!!!!!!!!
Vist my websites - http://pminmo.com & http://millpcbs.com
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 10-23-2005, 10:40 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2
amuron is on a distinguished road

That makes sense from the standpoint of making a board single sided. I have done the same, as I have yet to be able to find an easy way to connect the two sides of a board together (other than just ordering them). I use 1206's as I can run a trace between them. My process is not good enough to do so with an 0805. One time I designed a plasma controller board with 0402's, but I had my tech build it for me. Fortunately he didn't go postal, but he did go out in the backyard and do some shooting afterwords.

I like to buy partial reels of parts off ebay as I'm really cheap when it comes to my own stuff. So far I have been pretty lucky. I may go ahead and do an SMD board, I'll see if it looks reasonable enough, or else I'll just order some of the plate through boards off your website. I'm no guru when it comes to layout. I know just enough to shoot myself in the foot.

There are a few tricks to SMD. I use a magnifying headset, and that works ok. In my past job, we had Mantis viewers, and they made it simple. The other thing I've found is that flux is extremely helpful. RMA is good, do not use acid core, and be sure to clean things up when you are done. I have been less than pleased with no clean flux, although for a motor driver its probably ok, if its active enough.

For socketing a qfp44, get a good socket. The cheap ones are meant for reflow only, and they melt as soon as you get a soldering iron near them. The good ones will allow you to safely hand solder the pins, although it is tight. Another trick for soldering a QFP44 is to gob solder all over the pins, making sure you have good solder joints to the board, and then after it has cooled, flux it, and use solderwick to remove the excess. It puts less stress on the part, and is a lot faster, and shorts are a less likely. It does require some practice. The same works for a TSSOP if the board has soldermask. I have been too paranoid to try it on boards without solder mask.

Ron
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 10-31-2005, 09:33 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 509
smarbaga is on a distinguished road

i remove and replace tsops ( by hand ) whenever needed , i have 30 years experience in this stuff. i prefer the good old day , the tubes, but the consentration of functions makes for a lot less traces wires and soldering.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 11-02-2005, 12:10 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: US
Posts: 2
garyc is on a distinguished road

Power dissipation of the components and the dimension of the PCB may dictate the use of mixed technology. A power FET or voltage regulator in the SMD TO-252 package may requires many square inches of board space for heat sinking, while the To-220 part requires 1 inch including the heatsink. Some ICs in dip package dissapate more heat than the SMT version. If the SMT version is used, then it needs to be de-rated. Most SMD connectors also require a larger PCB footprints than the thru-hole version. Some electrolytic caps have a smaller diameter than SMT. I try to use all SMT components on my designs because they are mass produced, using SMT auto insertion machines. If I have to use thru-hole caps or resistors, they are usually axial leads as radial leads are not machine insertable.

I've designed a 2 axis controller using the 3977 (TSSOP version), all SMT except the electrolytic caps and connectors because of the reasons stated by Phil. To anyone who are building the 44 pin 3977, avoid using the socket and solder the chip directly onto the copper as the ground pins are heatsinks.

Gary
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 11-02-2005, 02:53 AM
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 53
philba is on a distinguished road

when I first started using SMDs, I looked into SMD connectors - much more expensive than TH ones. Probably not as much demand.

On the heat sink pads: most of the SMD MOSFETs I've looked at (lately that is a LOT) want 2 oz copper with a 1" sq pad. With a good heatsink, a to220 way outperforms the various SMD packages, even the dpak ones.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353