![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Open Source CNC Machine Designs Discuss Open Source CNC Machine Designs here. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I am a newbee to CNC. I am a self taught hobby machinest with some cad skills. I have been lurking for a while and now have semi firm plans to make a moving table router with the Z axis stationary. My plan is to construct the frame from 1 inch square tube using ball bearings for rolling gliders on the tubing. For the Z axis I am looking for a good price on Ebay for a set of Linear rails and bearings. My main question at this point regarding the moving table ... is it manditory (or recommended) that the X and Y movements have bearings top, side and bottom on the tubing runners or is top and side enough. I have attached a couple of drawings showing some thoughts of the machine design along with the "glider" details. Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated! Also ... hope this is the correct place to submit this sort of post ... please correct me if it is out of place Mac Corvallis, Montana |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| For a router support on axis [axes?] is required..plasma or torch type table additional upward support isn't needed... I'm about half way through building another plasma /oxy table, and I used cheap chinese bearings for side to side [4 brgs] and support on bottom [2 brg], with no regard for any upward pull...after all if the cutter pulls the arm up, then it's way too low on the table.. ![]() for any significant load, which is pretty well any 'contact' type of cutting, support in all directions is required.. Last table had linear bushings with acme thread and rudimentry zero backlash nuts, the one before had actual THK rails and 'store bought' ballscrews.. for the intended purpose of this one [flat steel cutting for brackets, braces, etc.) a final cut tolerance of +/_ 0.005 is more than enough...if it turns out that tight.. ![]() So far X/Y movement with 50 lbs pressure applied is around 3 thou..on the torch carriage..don't have the screws tied in as of yet... maybe tomorrow... enjoy.. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| This project is to gain some knowledge about CNC prior to a CNC conversion of my milling machine. I will be using a router head and most likely cutting wood, plastic and possibly aluminum with this router setup. I currently use Design Cad for drawings which has the ability to export in several formats including DXF. I have been reading about Mach3 for CAM operations and conversion to G code. With the little knowledge I have, this program seems to have the features I need. What suggestions do you have for someone with limited bucks? Reply With Quote |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
The top side will be enough. Mach 3 is an excellant program also. Not very expensive and easy to learn and use. When you do go cnc I would suggest a non-expensive CAM system too. Just a CAM also, no need to learn CAD over again and what you have will work fine. May I suggest looking into Dolphin CAD/CAM when the time comes. The website is www.cadcamconsultants.net. If there is anything else I can assist with, please let me know. |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| If LazyCAM (included with Mach3) can't quite do what you need, take a good look at SheetCAM. www.sheetcam.com It should work fine with DesignCAD and the price can't be beat.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
I have been thinking of different ways to build an inexpensive trolly system and this is my latest design. This design uses cheap skate board bearings running on 1/2" angle iron welded to 1" square tube (the frame). The side limiting bearings are tucked under the angle iron preventing the table from moving upward if lifted. The top bearing will track on top of the angle iron (might need to be milled flat ... we will see) and the side limiting bearings will track directly on the 1" square tube. My cad drawings show the distance from bottom to working surface to be right at 6". Any thoughts ? Mac |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trade offs between Moving Gantry and Moving Table | gregmary | DIY-CNC Router Table Machines | 11 | 04-22-2011 01:48 PM |
| Moving Table vs Moving Gantry; Dremel vs Router | chuckknigh | DIY-CNC Router Table Machines | 32 | 03-27-2007 08:48 PM |
| Design question CNC Router Table | dan2004 | Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design | 7 | 12-10-2006 07:55 AM |
| Anyone ever seen the most Rigid/strong design 3axis moving table Mill ? | Calico | DIY-CNC Router Table Machines | 4 | 04-21-2005 03:42 PM |
| Moving Gantry Or Moving Table | DDM | DIY-CNC Router Table Machines | 9 | 04-28-2004 10:46 PM |