CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > WoodWorking Machines > DIY-CNC Router Table Machines > Open Source CNC Machine Designs


Open Source CNC Machine Designs Discuss Open Source CNC Machine Designs here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 01-25-2007, 08:06 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 157
jsage is on a distinguished road
Higher End Large Format Router Mill Project

Greetings Folks,

I have put in my time reviewing different projects, resources on this fine site. Decided if I am going to go through the process I might as well share my success and or failure with anyone interested.

I just finished an interesting pdf posted on the site. A deterministic process for evaluating design option towards a specific outcome. It's an MIT Doctoral thesis that seemed to fall under philosophy. I guess at MIT the technical component is assumed. Of value I think it provided a good structure/methodology for developing a CNC machine. Kudos to the poster and the writer. Coverage of beams, solids, tubing, finite element analysis, pugh charts, damping were interesting.

Thanks to Joe and Mr. Steele for sharing their projects.

One thing I notice that there is an expectation by some to have everything figured out in the beginning. I find that problematic since in many design cycles I have seen The process is iterative and a change in one feature changes the others.

Anyhow enough intro.

The goal:

Universal Platform- the capability to work with a variety materials and project sizes within reason. Expandability within reason, additional axes, fabrication methods.

Honest 8' x 4 x 2?

base welded steel tubing (on hand) concrete dampened, torsional box upper frame with basin, polymeric concrete work surface.

ball screw, linear slides (fabricated where possible) determine most affordable compromise

capabilities: standard woodworking, rough lumber milling, green concrete, aluminum, mild steel, FRP Sectional mold prototyping.

Target Initial investment for base platform $2,000

Last edited by jsage; 01-26-2007 at 08:24 AM.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 01-25-2007, 08:15 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: us
Age: 55
Posts: 668
Madclicker is on a distinguished road
You lost me at $2000. That's an unrealistic number for the machine you described.
__________________
Steve
DO SOMETHING, EVEN IF IT'S WRONG!
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-25-2007, 08:27 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 157
jsage is on a distinguished road
Clarification

I can see your point. To some degree it is based on materials on hand. A better way might be saying my incremental investment. I'd say I have 90% of the structural components which leaves ball screws, and drive systems. I'm looking to fabricate the initial linear slides in aluminum.

It may be unrealistic but it is a starting point. I probably have a couple hundred feet of steel pipe (schedule 40 type) mig welder 20 inch band saw aluminum capable. 2 1/2 hp router. Pentium desktop system (using laptops).

So the goal is use materials at hand with carefully chosen bargains.

The X will be driven by a single screw below the working area in its own torsion box.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 01-26-2007, 02:09 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 157
jsage is on a distinguished road
The major goal here is rigidity.

Nixed: The four pipe construction is intended to approximate the mechanical characteristics of a 6 inch square tube.

Nixed: The four slide design on the long axis is designed to give three point support and allow stability for a long z axis.

By committee ; ) it was decided that the pipe method was two challenging to maintain true and square dimension, beside being a lot of work. The value of the lower slides and ballscrew placement was similarly thrown out for the conventional dual screw method.

First images include revision to 4" frame 2" gantry. 4 inch gantry material looks really odd.

Obviously with the different design I need to consider ballscrew placement and if I want to shield the rail, ballscrew. Since these haven't been pinned down I focused on a first pass design. On my own review it needed some additional span support.

Did the concrete and rebar reinforcement experiment last night, giving it some time to cure to measure improvement using the pretzel pipe.

Bought a chopsaw, Taskforce ain't bad for the money, smooth movement, good clamping, ok angle setting, I can make it bog. The cuts are far better and feel safer than using cutoff wheel on grinder.

Miss the pipe barge a little but not too much.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	cnc base render v5_2.jpg‎
Views:	174
Size:	42.9 KB
ID:	30619   Click image for larger version

Name:	cnc base render v5_3.jpg‎
Views:	179
Size:	66.2 KB
ID:	30620   Click image for larger version

Name:	cnc base render v5_4.jpg‎
Views:	305
Size:	78.7 KB
ID:	30631   Click image for larger version

Name:	cnc base render v6_1.jpg‎
Views:	176
Size:	35.1 KB
ID:	30798  

Click image for larger version

Name:	cnc base render v6_2.jpg‎
Views:	149
Size:	35.4 KB
ID:	30799   Click image for larger version

Name:	cnc base render v7_1.jpg‎
Views:	154
Size:	36.2 KB
ID:	30815   Click image for larger version

Name:	cnc base render v8_1.jpg‎
Views:	181
Size:	36.4 KB
ID:	31022  

Last edited by jsage; 02-05-2007 at 01:58 AM. Reason: Design Pictures
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 01-26-2007, 02:38 AM
dertsap's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 3,608
dertsap is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?
wow ,you have some serious cutting and welding ahead of you
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 01-26-2007, 02:59 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 157
jsage is on a distinguished road
Yep,

Was thinking the same . I'm going to try some 1/10th scale for feasibility to optimize and minimize the complexity figure out how to incorporate missing structural detail. Jigging, and a tool I recollect for mating round tubing might make it tolerable. It seems it is always hard to get away from the chicken and egg problem.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 01-26-2007, 08:42 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 157
jsage is on a distinguished road
Basic FEA, Material deflection on simplest frame structure

Today I'll do a little experiment to what the deflection rate is for the 1" steel pipe I have available and see what magnitude of stiffening etc I get from the design, addition of internal concrete dampening. Should be interesting. Still looking for post on pdf mentioned. Will put under resources.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 01-26-2007, 09:00 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 157
jsage is on a distinguished road
Resources

Resources used in this project

Rapid Machine Design: Key topics: Deterministic Design process, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), dampening http://www.mech.utah.edu/~bamberg/re...e%20Design.pdf (200 pages worth reading)

http://oneoceankayaks.com/madvac/madvac_index.htm High Precision 4X8 Metal capable
https://www.onsrud.com/home Specialty End Mills
Ballscrew Basics Ball Screws

http://www.rockfordballscrew.com/bss.htm Ball Screw Selection

Last edited by jsage; 02-04-2007 at 10:03 AM.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 01-27-2007, 12:08 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 157
jsage is on a distinguished road
Materials and Characteristics

Steel tubing:

Did some very basic analysis on the characteristics of the steel tubing. Outside diameter approx 1 3/8" wall thickness 1/8". Approx 1.5 pounds per foot.

Method: spanned a 6ft section over two uprights with two commercial buckets set 16 inches apart with a home made plumb. Measurements done with cheap mechanical ruler. Measured filling with water and removing water, consistent in both directions. Some increments interpolated since the process was a bit tedious.

Did a quick measure with 1/2 the span and the deflection decreased by more than 1/2 (approximately)

Next step add concrete then rebar. Then test actual design. Will probably do harmonic test and dynamic test if possible.

Conclusions were that an unmodified pipe with large span did experience significant flex under higher static loads. At approximate 100 pounds the 6 ft length flexed .186 inches. So I'm more comfortable that I am not overbuilding unecessarily.

Had a small epiphany today on how to measure deflection in an easier fashion. As Dr. Evil would say "Laser". I have a "mini laser" from an air rifle. set perpendicular to pipe and center. Parallel might be more interesting. Mark initial level then just add water and mark the movement. Might add a glued on flat marking piece to simplify measurements.

Never found that damn "laser" but I did find a local steel supplier who has what I'm looking for at the right price. The steel composition and characteristics need to be figured out but this what I found a the Metal Mart.

Damn have my quote for roofing but not the steel prices. It's primed and inside at least it looks cold rolled.

Anyhow 4" x 4" by 24' 11 gauge ran $76

The base works out to $234 with tax
rebar and concrete will be extra

$40 for rebar
$40 for concrete (horizontal structures)

So I expect when it's said and done approximately $500
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	basic flex.JPG‎
Views:	144
Size:	31.5 KB
ID:	30457  

Last edited by jsage; 02-02-2007 at 03:13 PM. Reason: Add 3' Span
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 01-28-2007, 07:20 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 157
jsage is on a distinguished road
Design vs Desired Capabilities

Below is a first pass spreadsheet which should allow you to compare desired features versus expected version capabilities
2nd pass
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Sample Spreadsheet Feature value vs Design Capability v3.jpg‎
Views:	163
Size:	101.7 KB
ID:	30632  

Last edited by jsage; 01-30-2007 at 09:26 AM.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 01-30-2007, 10:03 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: canada
Posts: 18
faststeve is on a distinguished road
Use one large steel tube instead of that small tube welded truss. Don't you realise steel bends where you weld it !

That thing would be bent and twisted like a pretzel.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 01-30-2007, 11:20 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road
I, personally, can not imagine welding that thing up and having it resemble anything other than a pretzel - especially with many of the tubes having welding performed only on one side down the length. The structure will resemble a bannana unless you have serious fabrication experience. Just my impression.

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
large(ish) 5-axis router project vwdevotee DIY-CNC Router Table Machines 34 10-30-2007 07:04 AM
Build your own large format printer? rackbox Printing, Scanners, Vinyl cutting and Plotters 12 06-16-2007 11:07 AM
The Large mill from scratch project dberndt Vertical Mill, Lathe Project Log 9 02-01-2007 12:47 PM
3X3 Gantry router/mill project Bloy2004 CNC Wood Router Project Log 88 03-12-2006 12:07 AM
Large format plotter/drafting machine thuffner3 DIY-CNC Router Table Machines 4 01-17-2004 12:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353