i am not sure on this; i will run some trials next week
:Code:T0202 M110 SB=400 M13 M08 G94 G00 X3.75 Z1 X2.15 Z-0.5625 G178 Z-0.5625 C270 X-1.02 I1.95 F22.2224 G180 ( X3.75 ) X11.5 Z10.5 M12 M09 M109 M30
Hello,
We are having issues with live tooling (tapping) on our new (used) lathe. Program runs fine until G178 line where spindle starts at required rpm (400) and as it approached part, rpm drops to maybe 20 and stalls - no movement and no alarms.
Program:
T0202
M110
SB=400M13
G00G94X3.75Z1.C270M08
X2.15
Z-.5625
G178X-1.02Z-.5625I1.95F22.2224E0.
G180
X3.75
X11.5
Z10.5
M12
M09
M109
M30
We are stumped - any help appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Similar Threads:
i am not sure on this; i will run some trials next week
:Code:T0202 M110 SB=400 M13 M08 G94 G00 X3.75 Z1 X2.15 Z-0.5625 G178 Z-0.5625 C270 X-1.02 I1.95 F22.2224 G180 ( X3.75 ) X11.5 Z10.5 M12 M09 M109 M30
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
Not sure about if you've run this before and this is a new issue or not, but, i'm fairly certain in sync tapping that the spindle stops before it goes to tap a hole.
Also, i'm not sure about the rest of the world, but i'm lazy, so i leave my tapping cycles in g95 and just give the machine the thread designation for the feedrate: F1/18
That way if someone comes along and changes the RPM, you still get a good thread.
Lastly, my programming manual doesn't specify an E value for the sync tapping line, is that a carry over from something or any specific reason it's in there?
.
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
definetly not good : there is a fashion to worry about what others will sayAlso, i'm not sure about the rest of the world ...
i also preffer G95; i understand easier cutting specs from the [ mm / o ] perspective, rather than from [ mm / min ]i leave my tapping cycles in g95 and just give the machine the thread designation for the feedrate: F1/18. That way if someone comes along and changes the RPM, you still get a good thread.
F1/18 :
... 400/22.2224=17.999
... 22.2224*25.4/100=1.411mm/o
... 25.4/1.411=18 tpi > yup
if i would program tpi threads, than :
i promised some time ago to share the way i program threads : still working on that meanwhile it got better, but i wait for a finish aspect ; however, at this intermediate state it rocks i have a running setup that delivers stable threads with 0.02 tolerance with an insert that everybody told me to trash itCode:V1 rpm V2 tpi ( * ) ... SB = V1 ... G178 XZCIR F +1 / V2 G95
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
i changed inch>mm and run the folowing code on the machine .. it worked
also, i simplified it :Code:G00 X500 Z150 T0505 ( M08 ) M110 SB=400 M13 G00 X3.75*25.4 Z1*25.4 C270 ( X95.25 Z25.4 ) X2.15*25.4 ( X54.61 ) Z-0.5625*25.4 ( Z-14.2875 ) G178 Z-0.5625*25.4 C270 X-1.02*25.4 I1.95*25.4 F+25.4/18 G95 G180 ( X+5.08 ... -25.908 Z-14.2875 I49.53 ) ( X3.75 ) ( X11.5 ) ( Z10.5 ) M12 ( M09 ) M109 G00 X500 Z150 M02
... you may need C270 inside G178; during trials, even if C270 was written before G178, C was index to 0 when tappingCode:G00 X500 Z150 T0505 M110 SB=400 M13 G00 X[2.15-1.95]*25.4 Z-0.5625*25.4 C270 ( X5.08 Z-14.2875 C270 ) G178 Z-0.5625*25.4 C270 X-1.02*25.4 I0 F+25.4/18 G95 ( X-25.908 ) G180 M12 M109 G00 X500 Z150 M02
... about this i don't know what to say
... maybe M and Z can not get within droop
... maybe only M has problems
sorry, but i really don't know / kindly !
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
samples for osp300 :
Code:V1 = 400 ( rpm ) V2 = +25.4/18 ( pitch ) V3 = 60 ( X start ) V4 = 30 ( X end ) V5 = 110 ( Z start ) V6 = 270 ( C start ) ( * ) G00 X375-VETFX Z150-VETFZ M203 T0505 M110 M08 SB=V1 M13 G00 X=V3 Z=V5 C=V6 M63 G178 Z=VSIOZ C=VSIOC X=V4 I0 F=V2 G95 M141 G180 G00 X375-VETFX Z150-VETFZ M109 M09
check_offset_errors dynamic_indexing + lookahead_CTR SB=V1 M13 G00 X=V3 Z=V5 C=V6 M63 G178 Z=VSIOZ C=VSIOC X=V4 I0 F=V2 G95 M141
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
Tehole is right on the money. G95 is REQUIRED to sync tap since as the M spindle slows down to reverse, the RPM is changing and the only way to keep it in sync is to be feeding in IPR thus G95.
Give that a whirl. I also do the same as teahole with the feedrate.
Best regards,
Experience is what you get just after you needed it.
Thank you all for the input! When machine free's up, we will try G95...this is a new machine for us and unfortunately, previous owner is unable to help.
teahole was talking about the case of getting a wrong thread, when rpm inside the program is changed, and feed is designed in G94Tehole is right on the money. G95 is REQUIRED to sync tap since as the M spindle slows down to reverse, the RPM is changing and the only way to keep it in sync is to be feeding in IPR thus G95
sync should work for G94 in the same way as for G95
ps : both of you are right on the $$$
you did not have money to pay the cnc, so ....?... and unfortunately, previous owner is unable to help
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...
if teahole is saying something, and mr Wizard will develop something from that, and what i say should never contradict mr Wizard, than it means that :
... teahole said something than may be ok
... mr Wizard is always true
... and i did not understand
or
... teahole believes in things that are not real
... mr Wizard is always true
... i did understand
or
... mr Wizard & teahole : always true
... and i really don't understand
or
... mr Wizard or teahole : always true
... maybe i understand
just kitting, there is a lot of help from you both, thank you !
we are merely at the start of " Internet of Things / Industrial Revolution 4.0 " era : a mix of AI, plastics, human estrangement, powerful non-state actors ...