Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: NT4250 DSG help

  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    13
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Question NT4250 DSG help

    Running 40" parts between the 2 spindles.

    Center section cut down from 4.3 to 2.875. 2.5 long x 4.0 diameter ends.

    I want to rough the center section with the head1 and the bottom turret. Head 1 plunge cutting at a 20 degree angle from X4.3 Z-5.5 to X2.875 Z-7.772. Then linear feed to 19.24.

    At the same time bottom turret plunge cuts from X4.3 Z-18.9 to X2.875 Z-19.22 then linear feed to Z-32.66.

    Problem is I can't get the two turrets to cut independantly. Different combinations of M314/M315 and G68/G69 don't work. I can get head1 to run it's operation but not bottom turret. I get a command prompt time out alarm.

    Can cycles on both programs.


  2. #2
    Registered fordav11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Fordaville
    Posts
    1,668
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    you may need to add waiting codes to synchronize the turrets.
    usually waiting codes are M100 to M197

    also possibly need other M-codes like
    M303/M304 - MAIN/SUB spindle active for spindle control commands
    M34 Dual synchronize spindles turning mode – Phase control C-axis chucks
    M35 Dual synchronize spindles turning mode – RPM speed only
    M36 Dual synchronize spindles turning mode – CANCEL

    I don't know what M314/M315 is.

    If you post the full program we may be able to help more.....
    Last edited by fordav11; 10-21-2011 at 05:17 AM.


  3. #3
    Registered fordav11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Fordaville
    Posts
    1,668
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    oh wait. you are telling the machine to do balance cutting (G68) but the two process paths you want to cut are completely separate so it is not a balance cutting operation. try removing the G68 and let both programs run by themselves.
    you may need to add a waiting code at the start of the cycle so they are both positioned at the start diameter and ready to go and another wait code at the end of the cycle and leave the tool at the same X position until the other head has completed then move both turrets away together.

    i.e.

    Code:
    program 1               program 2
    ---------               ---------
    G0 X4.3 Z-5.5           G0 X4.3 Z-18.9
    M100                    M100
    G71 P10 Q11 etc         G71 P10 Q11 etc
    N10                     N10
    ......                  .......
    N11                     N11
    M101                    M101
    G0 X300. Z300.          G0 X300. Z300.
    Last edited by fordav11; 10-21-2011 at 05:51 AM.


  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    13
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    M314/315 is feed sync on and off. M303 and M35 are used.

    I've tried wait codes and that didn't work.

    I have been able to get head1 and turret 2 to start at same time but t2 waits at end of cut for h1 to finish that cut and both start at same time for next cut. Not reducing cycle time that way.


  • #5
    Registered fordav11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Fordaville
    Posts
    1,668
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    did you remove the G68? that is the problem IMO


  • #6
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    13
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Yes, removed G68. Still doesn't work.


  • #7
    Registered fordav11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Fordaville
    Posts
    1,668
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    and M314/M315 also? No syncing is required at all except spindle rotation sync.


  • #8
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    13
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Yes. M314 omitted.

    With spindle sync only and a wait code before the canned cycle and at the end on both pgms the turrets don't even cut.


  • #9
    Registered fordav11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Fordaville
    Posts
    1,668
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    ok so with both turrets working (but waiting for the cuts to finish) try writing it long hand. i.e. no cycles. does that work?


  • #10
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    13
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Haven't tried long hand.

    There are several proven programs, all with canned cycles. If I can make it work with cycles my life is easier.

    I work for a large corporation with a programming dept. I can't get much help from them. The don't think the proven programs should be changed. I have been on this 9 axis Mori (my first) for 2 months and I think I know more than them. And I'm learning new **** everyday.

    I miss the Integrex I ran.


  • #11
    Registered zooloader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    142
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    "I have been able to get head1 and turret 2 to start at same time but t2 waits at end of cut for h1 to finish that cut and both start at same time for next cut. Not reducing cycle time that way."

    Is there an interference problem that has made you write one tool with a longer path than the other?
    I would make them the same length so they start and finish at the same time.
    Why can't you use a normal balance cut process?
    Maybe try starting at each end and work towards the middle?


  • Similar Threads

    1. Need Help!- NT4250 Tool Pre-Setter alarm
      By dimatec in forum Mori lathes
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: 09-07-2010, 01:20 PM

    Posting Permissions


     


    About CNCzone.com

      We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

    Follow us on

    Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.