CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Mechanical Engineering > Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design


Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design Discuss general mechanical design and mechanical calculations.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 06-07-2006, 11:35 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: EGYPT
Posts: 167
max_imum2000 is on a distinguished road
please check my design. also screw position ?

hello
as i am still new to this ,
i gut 6 thk slides 20W (115cm long)
and 2 thk ballscrew for x and y (80cm long)

i also have 7cm x 7cm , 2mm thick steel square shaped sections

from where i live it is so hard to get any other materials. or cast aluminum and finish it with presion at all.

so i decided to build a simple machine from what i have and use it to build another better machines

i have a 200oz steppers for this one.


now i dont know where should i place my ballscrew and how can i make it move the x-axis ?
can i put it on one side or at the center is better ?
must it be at the center line of the thk slide ? or up/down a little bit will be ok ?
is it better to place the thk slide in the x-axis as it shows in the pic or i can put it on the sides and it will be fine as well?

i am open to any suggestion . please give me your advice before i start making big mistakes

thank you
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg‎
Views:	207
Size:	18.0 KB
ID:	18721  
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 06-07-2006, 12:33 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

My first impression is to lay the X rails on the side and then extend the gantry straight down to tie back across, under the machine to hook to the ballscrew.

Maybe others will chime in with their opinions.

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 06-07-2006, 01:06 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: EGYPT
Posts: 167
max_imum2000 is on a distinguished road

but will the thk slides be as good on the sides as in the top ?
i mean in handling loads ?
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 06-07-2006, 02:08 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

Shooting from the hip, I would say yes - since you have two bearings on each side. Look up the THK bearing number to determine permissible loading and expected deflection and consider the weight of your gantry, etc. Spread the block out as far as reasonably possible on each side without sacrificing working envelope to maximize stability - standard procedure.

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 06-07-2006, 02:50 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: EGYPT
Posts: 167
max_imum2000 is on a distinguished road

how about something like this ?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg‎
Views:	126
Size:	31.0 KB
ID:	18726  
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6  
Old 06-07-2006, 03:10 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

That's pretty clean and simple - can you show how the table would be supported?

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 06-07-2006, 03:24 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: EGYPT
Posts: 167
max_imum2000 is on a distinguished road

i was thinking of something like this.
and whole machine will be welded to a very normal steel constructed table .
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg‎
Views:	135
Size:	18.9 KB
ID:	18727  
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 06-07-2006, 04:02 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

Looks like you are on to something. There are a hundred different ways to do this - yours is one way and probably a pretty good way to do it in my opinion. It's simple, compact and relatively easy to construct.

I would spread those bearings out a bit to help prevent skew and racking. Typically, you space them equal to 1/3 of the spanning distance to eliminate skew. In this case it would consume too much of your X stroke, though. There's a happy medium in there somewhere.

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 06-07-2006, 04:07 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: EGYPT
Posts: 167
max_imum2000 is on a distinguished road

thank you for your help.
i guess ur talking about spreading the bearing the y axis,
that sure i will do .

will it be better to place one bearing on top of the gantry and another on the side of it , instead of putting them both on the same side ?
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 06-07-2006, 04:54 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

Actually, the "rule" applies to any linear bearing arrangement, but I was mainly refering to the X bearing trucks. If the distance between the rails (across the table) is, say, 1 meter then you would be served well to spread the X axis bearings at least 330MM apart from eachother (along the X axis) on the same rail to minimize or possibly eliminate the potential for skew. In stark contrast, I am looking at a commercial router that has a beam of 2 meters and the bearings are only 300MM apart on the X rails, but I have also seen this machine skew pretty easily. I would spread them out (if you can afford to w/o losing too much of your envelope) to the 1/3 rule.

On the Y axis - placing one on the top and one on the front would really help with rigidity but it would also make them much more difficult to align. Placing them on opposite sides would probably work OK but it would be a real pain to construct a structure stout enough to realize the benefit from the slightly unusual arrangement. I would suggest placing them on the front surface as they are shown, but spreading the rails out as far as you can. Same for the trucks on those rails - distance is your best friend for rigid guiding.

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 06-07-2006, 05:41 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: EGYPT
Posts: 167
max_imum2000 is on a distinguished road

this is turning into a very strange looking machine

anyway i hope it works fine.

about the x axis bearing the best space i could do it about 200mm as the distance between them is about 90cm.

what do u think so far ?

thanks
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg‎
Views:	109
Size:	49.1 KB
ID:	18731  
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 06-07-2006, 06:31 PM
BobWarfield's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,340
BobWarfield is on a distinguished road

A lot of folks put the gantry cross piece for the ballscrew underneath the square tubing that supports the linear rails instead of running it between the rails. This allows your table to be supported by cross pieces instead of just at the ends.

Another thought is whether you want those rails mounted on top of the square tubing or on the outer sides. Having it on the outer sides gives it a little more protection from the mayhem happening in the middle although it is theoretically a little weaker for the rail. It also makes the top edges very clear in case you need to drag heavy sheets of material over them and don't want to damage the material or your rails.

Now you can imagine the gantry being a hollow box that wraps all the way around your support frame, slides along rails in the middle. It looks a little less strange, you get to use a single uninterrupted piece on either side which is simpler, and the table is better supported.

Just a few thoughts for your consideration. Make sense?

Best,

BW
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353