CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Mechanical Engineering > Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design


Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design Discuss general mechanical design and mechanical calculations.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 05-01-2005, 05:25 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 431
Splint is on a distinguished road
Ratio question

Hi guys,
I was wondering if someone here would be interested in checking my ratio calculations before I purchase belts and pulleys.

My y and z axies will be using threaded rod 2mm pitch.
The servos (Electrocraft E543) have a maximum continuous rpm of 4000.
I suspect a 3:1 ratio will be suitable, so 1333.33rpm * 2mm = 2666.66mm per minute.
2666.66mm / 25.4 = 104.98 inches per minute (not taking frictional losses into consideration).

My x axis will be using a belt and pulley system.
The driving pulley has a pitch of 11.4mm and has 18 teeth = 205.2mm per revolution.
To get the x and y axies proportional 2666.66 / 205.2 = 12.995:1

I may not be able to achieve the perfect ratio match between x and y but Mach2/3 has a calibration adjustment for this situation. Dose anyone see anything wrong with my calculations?

Thanks
Splint
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 05-01-2005, 04:30 PM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 15,709
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Splint, Unless I am missing something, your numbers are flawed for the X.
1/ If the x axis has the same motor and using the same pitch screw, (you did not indicate any different) the ratio will still be still be the same. A 11.4mm pitch and 18 teeth do not automatically come out at 205.2mm/rev, that is a circumference amount and not a linear amount.
If you have the same pitch screw, the feed rate at 4000 rpm would be 666mm/min.
What are you using on the Y & Z if not belt and pulley?
I could be proved wrong.
Al.
__________________
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 05-01-2005, 09:23 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 431
Splint is on a distinguished road

Thanks for the resonse Al,

OK, all the motors I will be using are the same for each axis (Electrocraft E543).
The drive mechanism for the y and z axies will simply be all thread, the only belts and pulleys used will be to reduce the maximum rpm from 4000 at the motor to 1333.33 at the leadscrew, so a 10 tooth pulley on the motor shaft and a 30 tooth pulley on the allthread leadscrew (2mm pitch) I think should equate to 104.98ipm.
The x axis will be running a fixed belt (no leadscrew)each side of the gantry running the full lenght of the machine with the 18 tooth pulley in mesh with the belt being turned to move the gantry. What I need to know is what ratio will reduce the 4000rpm at the x axis motor to acheive 104.98ipm (or close to) so I can get the x and y maximum speeds proportional to each other and be able to calibrate them in Mach2.

Thanks
Splint
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 05-01-2005, 09:54 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 746
2muchstuff is on a distinguished road

Your calculations for the y and z axis are correct. I'm working on the ones for the x axis. Before I can come up with the right numbers, I need to know the 18 tooth's pitch or the type of belt you are using on it.

Duh-- I see that it is 11.4 mm. Is that the belts pitch or the pulleys pitch diameter.
__________________
If it's not nailed down, it's mine.
If I can pry it loose, it's not nailed down.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 05-01-2005, 10:03 PM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 15,709
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

That makes more sense now on the x, the problem with the long belt drive is the degree of reduction needed, you have a similar problem when Rack & pinion is used, I generally look at a surplus planetary gearbox with this setup otherwise at around 12:1 it makes for a large pulley, also you have to maintain a certain centre distance to engage the recommended number of teeth.
Al
__________________
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 05-02-2005, 04:56 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 431
Splint is on a distinguished road

Thanks guys,
thats the belts pitch, I laid the belt flat on its back and measured over 10 teeth and divided by ten (to be more accurite than measuring over 1 tooth) and the pitch worked out to be 11.4mm. The belts are second hand and appear to have no part numbers or brand on them.
A surplus planetry gearbox would be hard to find here in Australia (I've not been able to find a place anywhere in oz the deals in surplus motion control equipment), I think I will end up using a series of belts and pulleys (a bit like a belt driven drill press) rather than one small pulley and one huge pulley.
As far as keeping the teeth engauged, that shouldn't be an issue as I'll have idlers either side of the drive pulley which will keep half of the pulley in mesh with the belt.
It might be an idea to show the math to calculate the ratio for future reference.

Thanks
Splint
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 01-12-2006, 08:19 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 109
George is on a distinguished road

Hi Al and Splint,
Can I jump in on this thread.
I just bought 3 E543's from a guy in Kansas (Ebay 6 left)
Are these suitable for my mill drill conversion. Will they have enought torque to run it.
Alumininium and small steel parts is what will be cut/millied.
What's the best way to drive them ? Gecko ? etc
I'd appreciate your help
Thanks
George
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Extremely basic machining question. touser General Metalwork Discussion 9 06-19-2005 01:51 AM
Ametek motors and step down ratio dowling177 Servo Motors and Drives 5 03-01-2005 01:24 PM
Timing belt/ratio question kinneycan CNCzone Club House 3 09-24-2004 05:20 AM
Just a question about plunge milling. Machine1 Hard and High Speed Machining 4 01-28-2004 09:36 PM
HF lathe question rs1300 General Metal Working Machines 0 01-19-2004 12:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353