![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Mastercam Discuss Mastercam software here. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Hi everyone, I want to start learning how to do CNC programming using MAsterCam, but my dilema is whether to use SW or MC for 3D modelling. I am a CNC machinist with 7 years experience but also I am a certified "computer guy", therefore it will not be a problem to learn either of them... Although I would prefer to spend my energy just playing with only one software and trying to get as good as I can, I have realized that is more easier to create a model in SW than MC. I want to mention that I am a beginer in both. I would really like to hear your opinion on this one. Thank you! |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
MC for CNC Programming SW for CAD Modeling Just my 2 cents.
__________________ Toby D. "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names" Schwarzwald (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) www.refractotech.com |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| cijunet, I'd agree with the above - we use solidworks with MCX for running a range of machines, from a little bench mill to a large Kondia 3axis VMC. Solidworks is so much easier for the modelling side - our students here manage to pick it up quite easily after a few hours tuition and working through the online tutorials etc. Cheers Alastair |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
I would agree. I use inventor 10 instead of SW, but the point is that MCAD is difficult to use as a drafting/modelling application (In my opinion.) On the plus side SW and Inventor import to MCAM easily and then the toolpath generation work can begin. Best regards |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Yw
__________________ Toby D. "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names" Schwarzwald (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) www.refractotech.com |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| I agree that SW has more power on the design side but I have used MC for my design and modeling for over 15 years and there modeling does a pretty decent job. PS I feel it is better and easer to use in MCX2. Now that is my 2 cents Use what you feel more comfortable using can’t go wrong.
__________________ (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) Cadcam Mastercam Instructor , Programming Consultant and ME (Manufacturing Eng) |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Mastercam solids are very easy to use, it may be less powerful than Solidworks but the power of surface and solids together in Mastercam is very powerful and is really no need for anything else for design. I'm a firm believer that if you are programming and designing get used to the one system it takes time jumping back and forth. I choose to use just Mastercam for my designing and programming. I have never needed any other design software in 15 years of using Mastercam and have made some very complex parts.
__________________ www.cad2cam.net Programmer/ Certified Cam Instructor |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| I believe "parts" is a key word here. How about assemblies, machines, weldments, sheetmetal, complete dies and simulation of mechanical assemblies. Most of my machined components come out of the above items. IMO if you are just looking to make A PART integrated modeling in a high end CAM is quit acceptable.
__________________ www.integratedmechanical.ca |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |