CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > CAM Software > Mastercam


Mastercam Discuss Mastercam software here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 11-13-2006, 12:23 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 59
cijunet is on a distinguished road
MasterCam or SolidWorks ?

Hi everyone,
I want to start learning how to do CNC programming using MAsterCam, but my dilema is whether to use SW or MC for 3D modelling. I am a CNC machinist with 7 years experience but also I am a certified "computer guy", therefore it will not be a problem to learn either of them... Although I would prefer to spend my energy just playing with only one software and trying to get as good as I can, I have realized that is more easier to create a model in SW than MC. I want to mention that I am a beginer in both. I would really like to hear your opinion on this one.
Thank you!
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 11-13-2006, 02:21 PM
tobyaxis's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 4,396
tobyaxis is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by cijunet View Post
Hi everyone,
I want to start learning how to do CNC programming using MAsterCam, but my dilema is whether to use SW or MC for 3D modelling. I am a CNC machinist with 7 years experience but also I am a certified "computer guy", therefore it will not be a problem to learn either of them... Although I would prefer to spend my energy just playing with only one software and trying to get as good as I can, I have realized that is more easier to create a model in SW than MC. I want to mention that I am a beginer in both. I would really like to hear your opinion on this one.
Thank you!
Use SW. As much as I love MC for Programming the CAD UI isn't that great. SW is easier, faster, and more powerful. After all it is just a stand alone 3D CAD Modeler. Unless you get the CAM Add-on which the roomers about that aren't the greatest.

MC for CNC Programming
SW for CAD Modeling

Just my 2 cents.
__________________
Toby D.
"Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
Schwarzwald

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

www.refractotech.com
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 11-13-2006, 05:08 PM
GaryCorlew's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Usa
Age: 55
Posts: 347
GaryCorlew is on a distinguished road

I agree with tobyaxis 100% unless I am worng in that case its all tobyaxis's fault
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 11-13-2006, 05:18 PM
dmealer's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 116
dmealer is on a distinguished road

Ditto
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 11-17-2006, 08:34 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 13
clarkea1 is on a distinguished road

cijunet,

I'd agree with the above - we use solidworks with MCX for running a range of machines, from a little bench mill to a large Kondia 3axis VMC. Solidworks is so much easier for the modelling side - our students here manage to pick it up quite easily after a few hours tuition and working through the online tutorials etc.

Cheers

Alastair
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 11-18-2006, 09:26 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Age: 50
Posts: 13
fifesmith is on a distinguished road
I agree

I would agree. I use inventor 10 instead of SW, but the point is that MCAD is difficult to use as a drafting/modelling application (In my opinion.) On the plus side SW and Inventor import to MCAM easily and then the toolpath generation work can begin.

Best regards
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 11-18-2006, 01:17 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 59
cijunet is on a distinguished road

Thank you guys for your reply! This helped me alot to make a decision.
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:15 PM
tobyaxis's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 4,396
tobyaxis is on a distinguished road

Yw
__________________
Toby D.
"Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
Schwarzwald

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

www.refractotech.com
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 11-19-2006, 12:01 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: myanmar
Posts: 7
ayezawwin is on a distinguished road

Hi fifesmith,mastercam is'nt difficult as you tell really.It can create complex shape of suface and solid and there contains various type of function like as "fplot" and so on, the real teast you want to know,teast it
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 11-19-2006, 09:30 PM
cadcam's Avatar
Community Director
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,721
cadcam is on a distinguished road

I agree that SW has more power on the design side but I have used MC for my design and modeling for over 15 years and there modeling does a pretty decent job.

PS I feel it is better and easer to use in MCX2.

Now that is my 2 cents

Use what you feel more comfortable using can’t go wrong.
__________________
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Cadcam
Mastercam Instructor , Programming Consultant and ME (Manufacturing Eng)
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 11-21-2006, 09:42 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 367
Steve Arteman is on a distinguished road

Mastercam solids are very easy to use, it may be less powerful than Solidworks but the power of surface and solids together in Mastercam is very powerful and is really no need for anything else for design. I'm a firm believer that if you are programming and designing get used to the one system it takes time jumping back and forth. I choose to use just Mastercam for my designing and programming. I have never needed any other design software in 15 years of using Mastercam and have made some very complex parts.
__________________
www.cad2cam.net
Programmer/ Certified Cam Instructor
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 11-21-2006, 09:54 AM
DareBee's Avatar
Monkeywrench Technician
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stratford, Ont. Canada
Posts: 2,783
DareBee is on a distinguished road

I believe "parts" is a key word here.
How about assemblies, machines, weldments, sheetmetal, complete dies and simulation of mechanical assemblies.
Most of my machined components come out of the above items.

IMO if you are just looking to make A PART integrated modeling in a high end CAM is quit acceptable.
__________________
www.integratedmechanical.ca
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361