Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 14

Thread: MasterCam or SolidWorks ?

  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    59
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    MasterCam or SolidWorks ?

    Hi everyone,
    I want to start learning how to do CNC programming using MAsterCam, but my dilema is whether to use SW or MC for 3D modelling. I am a CNC machinist with 7 years experience but also I am a certified "computer guy", therefore it will not be a problem to learn either of them... Although I would prefer to spend my energy just playing with only one software and trying to get as good as I can, I have realized that is more easier to create a model in SW than MC. I want to mention that I am a beginer in both. I would really like to hear your opinion on this one.
    Thank you!


  2. #2
    Moderator tobyaxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,394
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by cijunet View Post
    Hi everyone,
    I want to start learning how to do CNC programming using MAsterCam, but my dilema is whether to use SW or MC for 3D modelling. I am a CNC machinist with 7 years experience but also I am a certified "computer guy", therefore it will not be a problem to learn either of them... Although I would prefer to spend my energy just playing with only one software and trying to get as good as I can, I have realized that is more easier to create a model in SW than MC. I want to mention that I am a beginer in both. I would really like to hear your opinion on this one.
    Thank you!
    Use SW. As much as I love MC for Programming the CAD UI isn't that great. SW is easier, faster, and more powerful. After all it is just a stand alone 3D CAD Modeler. Unless you get the CAM Add-on which the roomers about that aren't the greatest.

    MC for CNC Programming
    SW for CAD Modeling

    Just my 2 cents.
    Toby D.
    "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
    Schwarzwald

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

    www.refractotech.com


  3. #3
    Registered GaryCorlew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    349
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I agree with tobyaxis 100% unless I am worng in that case its all tobyaxis's fault


  4. #4
    Registered dmealer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    116
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Ditto


  • #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    13
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    cijunet,

    I'd agree with the above - we use solidworks with MCX for running a range of machines, from a little bench mill to a large Kondia 3axis VMC. Solidworks is so much easier for the modelling side - our students here manage to pick it up quite easily after a few hours tuition and working through the online tutorials etc.

    Cheers

    Alastair


  • #6
    Registered
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    13
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I agree

    I would agree. I use inventor 10 instead of SW, but the point is that MCAD is difficult to use as a drafting/modelling application (In my opinion.) On the plus side SW and Inventor import to MCAM easily and then the toolpath generation work can begin.

    Best regards


  • #7
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    59
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Thank you guys for your reply! This helped me alot to make a decision.


  • #8
    Moderator tobyaxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,394
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Yw
    Toby D.
    "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
    Schwarzwald

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

    www.refractotech.com


  • #9
    Registered
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    myanmar
    Posts
    7
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Hi fifesmith,mastercam is'nt difficult as you tell really.It can create complex shape of suface and solid and there contains various type of function like as "fplot" and so on, the real teast you want to know,teast it


  • #10
    Community Director cadcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    3,136
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I agree that SW has more power on the design side but I have used MC for my design and modeling for over 15 years and there modeling does a pretty decent job.

    PS I feel it is better and easer to use in MCX2.

    Now that is my 2 cents

    Use what you feel more comfortable using can’t go wrong.
    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
    Cadcam
    Owner, contract Programming and Consultant , Mastercam Instructor and on line trainer at www.eapprentice.net
    Some tips: http://www.youtube.com/PrecisionProgramming


  • #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    367
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Mastercam solids are very easy to use, it may be less powerful than Solidworks but the power of surface and solids together in Mastercam is very powerful and is really no need for anything else for design. I'm a firm believer that if you are programming and designing get used to the one system it takes time jumping back and forth. I choose to use just Mastercam for my designing and programming. I have never needed any other design software in 15 years of using Mastercam and have made some very complex parts.
    www.cad2cam.net
    Programmer/ Certified Cam Instructor


  • #12
    Monkeywrench Technician DareBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Stratford, Ont. Canada
    Posts
    2,982
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I believe "parts" is a key word here.
    How about assemblies, machines, weldments, sheetmetal, complete dies and simulation of mechanical assemblies.
    Most of my machined components come out of the above items.

    IMO if you are just looking to make A PART integrated modeling in a high end CAM is quit acceptable.
    www.integratedmechanical.ca


  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Posting Permissions


     


    About CNCzone.com

      We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

    Follow us on

    Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.