CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > CAM Software > Mastercam


Mastercam Discuss Mastercam software here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 06-04-2011, 06:41 AM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 35
cncClintain is on a distinguished road
Most Efficient Material Removal Method

Whats more efficient for roughing decent size stainless parts on a mill? Trochoidal with solid carbide or traditional tool paths with 2" inserted cutters? Im mainly talking about cycle time but also need to consider tool life and cost.
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 06-04-2011, 07:52 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 111
barbter is on a distinguished road

Dynamic. Spiral in with a 4x flute centre cutting carbide, and let her go with a 10% stepover.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 06-04-2011, 07:13 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 30
jamesu229 is on a distinguished road

Depends on too many factors for an instant answer. Part profile, pockets, thickness, cubic inches to be removed, machine capabilities, tool manufacturer and type of stainless steel would be the main things to decide this.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 06-05-2011, 08:04 AM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 35
cncClintain is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by jamesu229 View Post
Depends on too many factors for an instant answer. Part profile, pockets, thickness, cubic inches to be removed, machine capabilities, tool manufacturer and type of stainless steel would be the main things to decide this.
Lets just say an area 10" x 10" x 2" in 316, not necessarily a pocket. And lets just say SGS solid carbide with a good coating around 3/4" vs. 2" sandvik inserted cutters with 5 inserts.

Last edited by cncClintain; 06-05-2011 at 08:41 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 06-05-2011, 08:50 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 30
jamesu229 is on a distinguished road

trochoidal paths most likely would be best. 316 ss is part of the 18-8 series of stainless, slightly more abrasive than 304. The part in the video was 304 and roughly the same area as yours. Proghrammed using truemill.

YouTube - ‪TRUEMILLING 304 SS‬‏
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 06-05-2011, 09:49 AM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 35
cncClintain is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by jamesu229 View Post
trochoidal paths most likely would be best. 316 ss is part of the 18-8 series of stainless, slightly more abrasive than 304. The part in the video was 304 and roughly the same area as yours. Proghrammed using truemill.

YouTube - ‪TRUEMILLING 304 SS‬‏
Thanks. I always liked the dynamic toolpath in mastercam but never used it in 316 and the shop i just started at is in love with their inserted cutters but theyve also been doing everything in mazatrol
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 06-05-2011, 12:56 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 30
jamesu229 is on a distinguished road

have they looked at any videos like this one or researched high speed machining. If not, It may not take much to get them hooked. Get them to watch my other videos, I have one posted that is running 17-4 ss at 1650 sfm and up to 720 actual ipm, dry
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 06-05-2011, 04:11 PM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 35
cncClintain is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by jamesu229 View Post
have they looked at any videos like this one or researched high speed machining. If not, It may not take much to get them hooked. Get them to watch my other videos, I have one posted that is running 17-4 ss at 1650 sfm and up to 720 actual ipm, dry
Thats a hefty feed rate. How do you figure your feeds and speeds for the small step over? I have found several formulas for the Radial Chip Thinning Factor but your feed rate still seems to be pretty high in comparison to recommended feed rates even with the Radial Chipping Thinning Factor taken into consideration. Is it the cutter you are using? Also, as your step over decreases I know your SFM can be increased. How do you figure this as well? Thanks for all of the info. We cut a lot of 316 and 304 and I think this should be the approach we take from now on.
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 06-05-2011, 08:30 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 30
jamesu229 is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by cncClintain View Post
Thats a hefty feed rate. How do you figure your feeds and speeds for the small step over? I have found several formulas for the Radial Chip Thinning Factor but your feed rate still seems to be pretty high in comparison to recommended feed rates even with the Radial Chipping Thinning Factor taken into consideration. Is it the cutter you are using? Also, as your step over decreases I know your SFM can be increased. How do you figure this as well? Thanks for all of the info. We cut a lot of 316 and 304 and I think this should be the approach we take from now on.

The endmills in the videos are my regrinds. The feed rates are from trial and error. In steel alloys under 30Rc I use a sliding scale .025 radial = .015 ipt translating to .250 radial = .005ipt for a 1/2" endmill at full depth. more times than not, sfm is determined by the machines lack of horsepower, accuracy and/or feed rate capabilities. I usually max out the machine in one way or another. Its great to program for a regular employer during the day and run a high performance endmill sharpening service at night, makes long term testing easy. With 300 series stainless, lower sfm and high feed rates are the best combination. Wish it was all 17-4, aka butter.
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 06-05-2011, 09:48 PM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 35
cncClintain is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by jamesu229 View Post
The endmills in the videos are my regrinds. The feed rates are from trial and error. In steel alloys under 30Rc I use a sliding scale .025 radial = .015 ipt translating to .250 radial = .005ipt for a 1/2" endmill at full depth. more times than not, sfm is determined by the machines lack of horsepower, accuracy and/or feed rate capabilities. I usually max out the machine in one way or another. Its great to program for a regular employer during the day and run a high performance endmill sharpening service at night, makes long term testing easy. With 300 series stainless, lower sfm and high feed rates are the best combination. Wish it was all 17-4, aka butter.
Thanks a lot. This is my first time with the stainless and Ive been watching them feed these inserted cutters straight into the side of the parts to rough them and its just beating the hell out of the cutters and I was wanting to show them this method but I just wasn't certain on feeds and speeds and Im new so I didn't want to go in and just start blowing up cutters.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 06-06-2011, 06:03 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 111
barbter is on a distinguished road

and I'd run 1/2" rather than 3/4 tools. It gets the revs up and the tools are cheaper!
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 06-07-2011, 05:33 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: US
Age: 26
Posts: 181
Ydna is on a distinguished road

I agree with the above, for ferrous materials anyway.
If working with aluminum you probably max out the removal rate by taking a full-depth, widest stepover cut as possible. it can be slow, but the amount being removed per pass is tremendous with a quality endmill. But with steels it's hard to do that unless you have a freakishly heavy spindle, and/or want to sacrifice the tool for only a few parts. So I agree that a dynamic toolpath is the way to go....I like using the 6 flutes for roughing myself (not with a crazy feed per tooth tho since I don't do a lot of production work in steels)

But if you were trying to rough out a surfaced feature you may want a different toolpath (high feed), unless you have X5 which as a dynamic surfacing ability.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Epoxy Bearing Material and Method JohnMcNamara Epoxy Granite 7 04-22-2011 03:50 AM
How to verify material removal in more than one job? kardang Surfcam 2 05-28-2009 02:01 PM
Extra Material Removal...Help Cartierusm ArtCam Pro 16 07-31-2008 06:56 PM
removal of 4140 HR Annealed material Zipdrive General Metalwork Discussion 4 01-11-2006 10:51 PM
material removal / air blower help DrStein99 DIY-CNC Router Table Machines 2 10-21-2005 07:49 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361