![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Machine Problems, Solutions , Wireless DNC, serial port Need help with your Machine or need a Machining solutions for , Serial Port, Cable problems between PC and all others DNC problems disucss them here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Ritul, Here is how I did it using rotary encoders: http://bellsouthpwp.net/A/r/Arts_home_page/lathe/
__________________ Art AKA Country Bubba (Older Than Dirt) |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| You should be able to fit pretty well any linear scale (DRO) system to any lathe with a little ingenuity and mount bracket fabrication. It's definately not rocket science if you go by the way the "factory" installers mount this stuff *shudder*. I usually end up re-doing all my new installs due to the crappy workmanship of those guys. Bubba's method is great, but sometimes you can lose needed resolution on a long axis because the LRT encoders work on a percentage of stroke resolution. eg 10 volts over 10" = 1v/1"; 10 volts over 1" = 1v/.1". You can do it man!
__________________ www.integratedmechanical.ca |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Thanks guys, I was thinking on bubba's line too, except that I intended using an open ended timing belt instead of cable. My worry is about backlash in the timing pulley & belt and I'm awaiting a reply from the timing belt mfr. on this one. Linear scale seems to be an easier option, but is it more expensive than a rotary encoder and a counter? I spoke to a rotary encoder mfr. and they suggested a 1000 ppr encoder to get an accuracy of 0.01mm - provided I take care of the mech. backlash. Cheers Ritul |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Ritul, From what I have read, backlash should not be a problem with the timing belt. However, you also need to realize the timing pulley will have a significant diameter to it and this will affect the resolution that you will get. Its the Pi D thing. One revolution will take Pi*D of the pulley to rotate the counter wheel. Example (if I can do the math right) 1" PD pulley * PI = 3.14159" of travel to make one revolution of the encoder. Using a 1000 line encoder (4000 quadrature) gives you a resolution of 3.14159/4000 or 0.00078". Is this good enough for your use? Of course, you can play with the diameter and see different effects. A rule of thumb that I was taught is...You want your resolution to be 10X greater than the accuracy that you want. So in this case, your accuracy would be on the order of 0.0078". On my system, I was dealing with a 5mm shaft and was struggling to get it below .0001" resolution so I could hopefully have 0.001" accuracy. And all of this assumes that you setup the program parameters correctly and thats a whole nuther ballgame
__________________ Art AKA Country Bubba (Older Than Dirt) |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Thanks Bubba What you say about the resolution is absolutely correct. I plan to use a 3mm pitch belt with a 15 teeth sprocket. I will have a 90 teeth sprocket fit on the shaft of the 15 teeth and the 90 teeth will drive a 15 teeth sprocket fit on encoder shaft. I guess for every 45 mm tavel of the carriage, the encoder will rotate 6 times, therefore I will get 1 revolution of encoder for every 7.5mm travel of the carriage. As per the calculation, I get a resolution of 0.0019 mm or 0.0000738" - is this ok if I'm looking for a max. resolution of 0.01 mm? Another alternative would be to increase the ratio of 90:15 to maybe 120:12 or something on those lines. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Ritul, Should work ![]() From what I am reading, you will be driving the encoder with a "jackshaft" arrangement to increase the rotation of the encoder? You will be using a small pulley as a driver for the large one which will then drive the small one on the encoder???? Also, I would try to limit it to one set of increasers as this will minimize any play (backlash) in the system.
__________________ Art AKA Country Bubba (Older Than Dirt) |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| ritul, look at Home shop machinist, I think the shooting star......... CBX Digital Readout - Home Page CBX and CBX 3d - The first low-cost Digital Readout System for owners of mills, lathes, mill drills and 3 in 1's. www.star-techno.com/ |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| I made a redneck dro on my small emco 5 lathe. I only did one axis at this time. I bought a digital depth mike similar to a set of calipers. Then I made 2 clamping fixtures. Mounted one to the bed and the other to the saddle. I get 8 inches of travel from this setup. Total cost $21.00. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Thanks guys the CBX has really got me thinking! The only hitch is that i'm looking at a resolution of atleast 0.002mm to get a fairly accurate least count of 0.01mm, but the CBX offers a resolution of 0.005" (0.0127mm) which would be a little less! The system I'm planning works out to the same cost or maybe slightly cheaper than the CBX but with little extra work. Cheers |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using your CNC Mill as a CNC Lathe | lstool | Knee Vertical Mills | 10 | 08-02-2010 12:06 AM |
| Help me buy my first Mini Lathe | Highfly | Mini Lathe | 20 | 05-10-2005 02:07 AM |
| OneCNC XR Series Lathe CAD/CAM Released: | OneCNC | Product Announcements & Manufacturer News | 0 | 03-07-2005 04:20 PM |
| DRO - Metric or Inch | DJ Morrow | General Electronics Discussion | 2 | 11-15-2004 02:06 PM |
| Heidenhain DRO advice | kong | General Metal Working Machines | 4 | 02-29-2004 02:44 PM |