Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Mach3 and Cam Bam discrepancy

  1. #1
    Registered uspl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    72
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Mach3 and Cam Bam discrepancy

    Hi all

    I am cutting (or trying to cut )two 5mm wide profiles, each is 2.5mm deep.

    The first is along the X axis, basically a trench 5mm wide, 2.5mm deep and 100mm long. At one end of the trench I have a 5mm wide arc profile, scribing a 90 degree bend that is also 2.5mm deep. The cutter is a standard two flute 5mm end mill.

    When I draw this in Cam Bam the two profiles overlap by 3mm to allow for under cutting at the very ends of each profile. What I want to finish up with is a trench 100mm long that then turns 90 degrees and continues for a further 50mm along the arc. All this looks great in both Cam Bam and in Mach 3 when I look at tool paths, cut widths etc. The end result is the trench and the arc are cut perfectly but they don't join; there is about a 2.5mm "under cut" where they should join.

    Any thoughts ?


  2. #2
    Registered cheetahcnc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    283
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Wouldn't you do a 5mm wide path with a narrower mill bit, so you can climb cut both sides? Just a suggestion, as the software, and machining process, might not like the large cutting contact at the radius/end.

    Jim


  3. #3
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    us
    Posts
    251
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Sounds like cam bam is simplifying the cut. why not post the code as 2 seperate programs, run one and then the other. that way cam bam does not use any "logic" to determine what you want to cut. i think cam bam is thinking too much and has decided that you intended something that you have not...

    Just a guess...
    Nate.
    Ann Arbor Meechigan


  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    us
    Posts
    251
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    also, what is you tool size set to? sounds like this might be a cutter-comp issue.
    Nate.
    Ann Arbor Meechigan


  • #5
    Registered uspl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    72
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by cheetahcnc View Post
    Wouldn't you do a 5mm wide path with a narrower mill bit, so you can climb cut both sides? Just a suggestion, as the software, and machining process, might not like the large cutting contact at the radius/end.

    Jim
    Thanks Jim

    I would use a smaller cutter but my JGRO setup means that tool changes are painful and inaccurate; the rest of the job needs much bigger profiles and pockets and some 5mm holes need to be drilled as well so a 5mm cutter does all the parts.

    I suspect some sort of cutter comp or inside/outside radius issue is at the heart of the problem as I also have a similar problem on another job where two trenches meet at 90 degrees and I have to force the vertical one way past where it should end in order to meet the horizontal one.


  • #6
    Registered uspl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    72
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nate View Post
    also, what is you tool size set to? sounds like this might be a cutter-comp issue.
    Thanks Nate

    The tool size is 5mm in CB and it is cutting the right widths on all my profiles and pockets, it is just the junction/overlap issue I cannot seem to fix.

    I'll try your suggestion on two programs and see how that goes.

    Cheers


  • #7
    Registered uspl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    72
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Fixed it

    0.9.8H Square pockets are squashed ovals - HELP ??

    It wasn't Cam Bam, it was Mach 3 and it was something I never would have thought of.

    Just like poor old HAL9000, I gave Mach 3 two conflicting instructions; keep a CV of 600mm but don't exceed the acceleration threshold. It did what it could and the result satisfied nobody.

    Hope this helps some one else.

    Regards

    David


  • Similar Threads

    1. Differences Between Mach3 Mill and Mach3 Plasma?
      By cjjonesarmory in forum Mach Plasma / Laser
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 11-18-2010, 10:12 AM
    2. Newbie- Using Mach3 with Reprap extruderUsing Mach3 with Reprap extruder
      By router101 in forum General CNC (Mill and Lathe) Control Software (NC)
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: 11-03-2010, 05:46 PM
    3. Need Help!- I cant get Mach3 to run
      By Crawler374 in forum Mach Software (ArtSoft software)
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: 09-07-2009, 01:11 PM
    4. help with mach3
      By chrispare in forum Mach Software (ArtSoft software)
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: 08-02-2009, 08:49 PM
    5. G-Rex & mach3
      By eloid in forum Machines running Mach Software
      Replies: 7
      Last Post: 03-15-2007, 12:50 AM

    Posting Permissions



    About CNCzone.com

      We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

    Follow us on

    Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.