![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2) Discuss LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2) Controlers here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
This post is (I Hope) for people to weigh-in on what components would make the best CNC MACHINING CENTER (VMC 20-40 amp motors) you can build and still fit in the garage. There are countless combination's of parts, controller cards, drives, encoders 200-2000ppr,servo motors, etc that you can use. The last factor I want to impose here is COST! Biggest Bang for the Buck! If something works just as good and costs less it wins. So let me guess the winners just to get things going: I personally am ruling out AC Servo for bang for buck reasons and other items too since we are all on a budget but nobody wants junk when they are done. Controller card- 1st- Mesa 5i20 2nd- Pico universal PWM Drives- 1st- Servo Dynamics type that came with machine 2nd- Pico PWM amplifier 3rd- Larkin Viper 200 with Pico "Gecko Interface" card. Encoders- 1st-1000ppr USDigital 2nd- What came on machine 500ppr. Servo Motors- 1st- What cam on machine if good. 2nd- Used SEM, Baldor,etc you can find cheap. This is all the high ticket parts I can come up with that will eat up your budget and I don't know that much about electronics to evaluate but I do know cnc milling and what happens if you choose poorly... . |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Oops! I forgot the VFD (Variable Frequency Drive) for the spindle. No self respecting system can be without one of these. 1st- Any Flux Vector model $$$ with spindle orient for tool changer. 2nd- Any Sensorless Vector model. Rigid Tapping but no spindle orient available. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
|
Hate to keep blowing my own horn, but the Pico PWM controller has more things included in it, that you have to pay extra for on the Mesa boards. So, it considerably narrows the cost in most applications.
brokers selling used motors for thousands of $. There is still occasionally a bargain, but they are harder to find. Keling has some very nice motors that go QUITE cheaply. I have tried their size 23 motor for $56, they also have a size 34 motor a little over $100. These need encoders added, the Cui fits nicely. IMTT USA has a quite awesome 80 mm motor for $135 I think, but it is a lot harder to put an encoder on it. If your install can use an encoder on the end of the leadscrew, this is a good source. Jon Jon |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| greeder, why would you go with a PWM controller over a PPMC? It was my understanding that you would have a little more choice as far as components goes with PPMC than PWM....and it seems the accumulated cost of components is what gets yo uin the end.. Do I have this wrong? |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
You still have to come up with a set of velocity servo amps. The Pico Systems PWM controller is $250, and Pico Systems brush servo amps are $125 per axis. The brushless servo amps are $150 per axis. So, you can get the PWM controller and 3 brush motor amps for less than just the PPMC interface boards alone. If you want the performance or other features of a velocity servo amp, then the PPMC is a good choice. If you just want a cheap servo system, the PWM controller and amps are cheaper. The PWM system needs fairly high resolution encoders to run smoothly, as it lacks the velocity feedback inherent in a velocity servo system. If you will be using low resolution encoders, the performance may not be acceptable. That's where a velocity servo shines, making a system with low-res encoders still run smoothly. Jon |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| to wait for the encoder to cross over to a new count to sense movement. Using only an encoder for velocity sensing, it is impossible to detect movement until the encoder hops from one count to the next. So, the servo loop is essentially running open loop until the count occurs. With a DC tachometer sensing the velocity and feeding it back to the velocity error amplifier, it is possible to constantly monitor velocity even between encoder counts. I did some tests while working on my own velocity servo amps about a decade ago, and was able to have totally smooth motion from 100 IPM down to 0.01 IPM, at which point the stick-slip friction finally overcame the finite gain of the system, and movement started to get slightly lumpy. This is a 10,000 : 1 velocity ratio! The encoder was providing about 3 counts per second at this rate. Without the tachometer feedback, it would be impossible for a servo to maintain smooth velocity with only 3 position updates a second. I couldn't measure it, but the DC tachs were calculated to be providing 7 micro-volts of output while moving at 0.01 IPM. You may wonder why I'm worrying over performance at 0.01 IPM, but when boring circles or cutting angles close to one axis, the other axis may be required to move extremely slowly. You don't want to have steps there, or you might as well use a stepper motor. This was with 1000 cycle/rev encoders directly mounted on the end of the ballscrews. This is why some control vendors now supply insane encoder resolutions on their systems, to provide velocity feedback. Jon |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EMC2 HELP HELP HELP | Alwyn | OpenSource Software | 2 | 10-11-2008 11:18 AM |
| Problem- emc 2.2.2 bug reports ? | Gads | LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2) | 13 | 02-14-2008 08:39 AM |
| Inspection reports | 1947Hack | Calibration & Measurement | 2 | 01-16-2008 06:59 AM |
| SmartCam custom Job reports | Independent CNC | General CNC (Mill and Lathe) Control Software (NC) | 1 | 11-09-2006 08:43 PM |
| Do you like Wallcrawler weird news reports? | WallCrawler | CNCzone Club House | 6 | 04-20-2004 07:12 PM |