![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2) Discuss LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2) Controlers here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Can anyone interpret the contents of the file referenced by a PROBEOPEN statement. I have a 3 axis mill, the x and y values make sense but I can make no sense of the z value. Also there are nine entries per G38.2 statement executed. I assume this is a feature, sorry bug? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
As far as I can make out this is the code that outputs the x,y,x,a,b,c,u,v and w coordinate values. Possibly this called once per gcode co-ordinate system. Have not got that far yet. However the Z value is at odds with the displayed value in the AXIS opengl window. Whereas axis reports a value of say -0.0057 (inches) the probe output file contains a value of -0.001322. Even worse I get an axis value of -0.0040 (inches) the probe output file value is 0.000278. Thats a change of sign so this is not simply a matter of scaling. I am still trying to get my head around the code so any help in this specific area would be welcome |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Had the same thoughts about having an offset set.Trouble is what offset? I am trying to find the bit of axis code that populates the Z axis GUI field and see how it doe it. I am not concerned about whether axis displays the right answer or the probe file has the right answer. Hey whats right and whats wrong, all I want to know is why they are different. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Have started using 2.3 beta 2. Had a 'doh' moment when I realised that the probe values for Z are when the probe switch trips. However the value displayed by AXIS is the Z position after EMC has stopped decelerating the probe. I did a few measurements and found that the difference between the two constant down to the fourth decimal place. Phew! Anyway having read the 2.3 docs and found that there are four variations on the G38.2 (3,4,5) command I am now looking at taking measurements when the probe approaches the workpiece and also when moving away from it. I wonder if the mean of the two will be any more accurate. Thanks for your help (and patience) big john t |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| The extra probing codes allow you to do faster probing as I understand it. Take a look at the smart probe pointed to here http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/deve...de.html#r1_1_4 John |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Like the smartprobe.ngc code. Keeps the probe tip a 'deceleration distance' away from the workpiece during the x direction traversal. The G38.3 detects if the probe collides with the workpiece when doing a lateral move. Like it and many thanks Big John T |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Probe output data?? | mgb1974 | Haas Mills | 7 | 10-31-2008 10:20 AM |
| Running a gcode output file in the computer | Palafox | General CAM Discussion | 3 | 06-10-2008 05:56 PM |
| How to get Gibbs to show output file (ie: final G-Code) in Notepad | Driftwood | GibbsCAM | 1 | 01-28-2008 06:51 PM |
| Output to file instead of stepper | mohd_madhoun | General CNC (Mill and Lathe) Control Software (NC) | 5 | 01-12-2008 02:55 PM |
| Probe output + DNC = confusion | ghyman | Digitizing and Laser Digitizing | 0 | 08-30-2007 09:41 AM |