CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Machine Controllers Software and Solutions > LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2)


LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2) Discuss LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2) Controlers here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 02-28-2011, 10:32 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: turkey
Posts: 14
shafagh is on a distinguished road
emc2 in industrial use

are emc2's supported pci boards, like motenc and mesa cards, really good for industrial uses? what I mean is, can I expect them to work for long times? how much should I expect them (not just time, but everything)? Isn't it better to pay for a ready-to-use controller from some big company? i don't have any problem with making things myself.

which brand is better? for example a m5I22 of mesanet or some Corresponding board from motenc or other brands?

any information will be appreciated
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 02-28-2011, 09:38 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 465
chester88 is on a distinguished road

Well If you want you can pay Mesa aprox 20% to build the boards with industrial temp ranges.
I don't know about Motenc Its not used much with EMC but I'm sure they are reliable.
I've not heard of reports of reliability problems with Mesa or Pico (the two most used)

As for what is better EMC or big company controller that really depends on you and your money.

Big company (lets say Fanuc) is
- turnkey (you tell them what you need)
- common lots of machine use it
- expensive software and hardware.
- closed source (you can't fix it or change it)

EMC is
- not turnkey (you have to configure it to do what you want)
- not as common there isn't a million machines running it.
- is free of purchase cost. it costs you your time. There is hardware costs.
- it is open sourced ( fix, change, understand it or pay someone to do it )

EMC is being used on large industrial machines using both Mesa and Pico boards
What are you trying to do with them?
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 02-28-2011, 11:30 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: turkey
Posts: 14
shafagh is on a distinguished road

thanks chester,
By industrial mostly I mean longtime use and hard serious works.
and going to use them for 4&5 axis milling and want them to be at least nearly good as what a Fanuc will be.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 03-01-2011, 12:20 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 465
chester88 is on a distinguished road

EMC Documentation Wiki: Videos

YouTube - EMC2 cinci test cut
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 03-01-2011, 12:47 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: turkey
Posts: 14
shafagh is on a distinguished road

thanks man
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 03-04-2011, 12:25 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Boalsburg PA
Posts: 844
unterhaus is on a distinguished road

I don't see why it wouldn't be. Just because a commercial control has proprietary electronics doesn't mean there is anything better about it. I look inside the control cabinets of every CNC I get a chance to, and none of them are that impressive. Most everyone ends up using industrial motor drives, and that's really where you need a robust setup.

I was just looking at the guts of the machine we use here at work. It has a windows interface, so it needs a smart coprocessor to actually do the motion. Turns out it uses a PMAC card. It has a common PC built into the cabinet. Looks ok from the outside, but the inside is a bit of a hack job. There are a batch of ribbon cables running through an open expansion slot space to a batch of breakout boards. The breakout boards have a cover over them, but otherwise it doesn't look any better or more robust than any EMC servo installation I've seen.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 03-04-2011, 01:15 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: turkey
Posts: 14
shafagh is on a distinguished road

yeah, you're correct, but there is also another software you might heard of, reprap, that used for rapidprototyping. it also controls a bunch of stepper motors, but you can't compare it with emc motion controlling.
I was just guessing that may be the same applies to emc2 and those big guys.

thanks for replying anyway.
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 03-05-2011, 11:08 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 309
jmelson is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by shafagh View Post
are emc2's supported pci boards, like motenc and mesa cards, really good for industrial uses? what I mean is, can I expect them to work for long times? how much should I expect them (not just time, but everything)? Isn't it better to pay for a ready-to-use controller from some big company? i don't have any problem with making things myself.
I have been using some of my own (Pico Systems) boards since 1998 or so on my Bridgeport. I have several customers that have been using these boards since about 2002. MPM in Wichita has been using our PPMC boards on several VERY large machines since about 2006.

These are not PCI boards, but plug into the PC parallel port. This sometimes makes computer upgrades easier, and now the PCI slot is being superseded by PCIe.

I generally design electronics to last a minimum of 20 years, and have a number of things I have built that are approaching 40 years of age, and still working fine.

Jon
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 03-06-2011, 09:47 AM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,540
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by shafagh View Post
thanks chester,
By industrial mostly I mean longtime use and hard serious works.
and going to use them for 4&5 axis milling and want them to be at least nearly good as what a Fanuc will be.
Over the past 30yrs I have installed commercial systems, Fanuc, Mitsubishi etc as well as PC based systems using regular off the shelf MB's built in to the enclosure and using motion cards such as Galil and Acroloop.
I have seen no difference in reliability between the two types, in spite of some of the most rigorous environments out there.
The difference you are probably going to see is in the features, although these are now becoming closer, and the time taken for integration, with the PC based usually taking longer.
Al.
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 03-17-2012, 03:03 PM
cnc-it's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 157
cnc-it is on a distinguished road

One thing I notice on Fanuc controls is they use gold plated pins on connectors..in a damp environment this makes a big difference ... costs a lot more to produce boards like this but other parts I have ie. a contraves spindle drive don't have this and I have to pull the plugs and clean the pins every now and then to stop faults occuring. My controls are 1984/5 still going strong.

John
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11  
Old 03-22-2012, 08:08 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 264
davidmb is on a distinguished road

I run a 1m x 600cm diy router under EMC2 on a PC via PCI parallel cards ( I bought a ten of these so I have plenty of spares, cost about £7 each two years ago ), I changed the PC to use compact flash instead of hard disk, so the only moving part within the PC is the fans on the chip cooler and PSU. I routinely run jobs that take 4 to 5 hours at a go and have had no problems at all for the last two years. ( I should really strip down the controlling PC every couple of hundred hours of runtime - but I haven't got around to that yet :-o ).

What really makes commercial kit so reliable is the service that you get from the vendor albeit at a cost, if a manufacturer finds a fault that is related to a particular component/batch they would trace all other similar components in the same batch and look to replace them asap or at the next service. Most diy'ers would generally only replace components when bust or during an upgrade ( because diy'ers are also on very tight budgets more compromises on components would be made - also build quality is subjective to the individual doing the building ).

So there are quite a few factors that need to be considered when comparing reliability of DIY / Commercial kit, and it is not purely down to just the components. In addition how you use the equipment also has a factor.
__________________
David
( never stop learning )
http://www.steamcastings.co.uk/
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 03-22-2012, 02:58 PM
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,084
svenakela is on a distinguished road

There are a bunch of companies out there using LinuxCNC for industrial machines retrofits. That's not worse than buying an old machine with a legacy system that isn't supported anyway.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Industrial Arm as CNC something? avayan Stepper Motors and Drives 1 01-02-2011 11:46 AM
Need Help!- industrial pc camay Controller & Computer Solutions 1 03-31-2010 09:20 AM
Help With Industrial PC buddym Controller & Computer Solutions 4 03-29-2010 02:22 PM
J&L Industrial Limited660 General Metalwork Discussion 2 06-19-2008 04:45 PM
ULS Industrial Series lasermikeone Laser Engraving & Cutting Machines 0 04-28-2008 08:02 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361