CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Mechanical Engineering > Linear and Rotary Motion


Linear and Rotary Motion Discuss ball/Acme screws, R&P, linear slides and theory here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 08-31-2008, 05:18 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 81
CNCDevil is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb Fixed Bearing w/ Belleville washers

This thread is a question about mounting unmatched A/C bearing in a homemade housing, using Belleville washers to achive a so called "Constant Pressure Preload".
I know that this is just another thread in the line many, but I couldn'd really find alot of posts where this subject is discussed in detail.


In the early stage of building my new router, I decided to make my own fixed bearings units, because they were awfullly expensive. How hard could it be just to mount two bearings in a housing? - Now I have learned why

The nuts and screws, which are the heart to accuracy of the system, won't be to any good, without the use of proper bearings. I just mean, that the quality of the bearing setup, should equal the quality of nut/screw. My learning curve regarding A/C bearings have been quite vertical these days.

A week ago, I bought some NSK/IBU 7201 B A/C bearings from Ebay, to use with my 16mm ball screws. As I was digging into the subject of fixed bearings, I got pretty frustrated. I've found out that it is impossible for me to make a decent DB or DF preload configuration. As the more "educated" person can see, there is not given a lot of details about the bearings, with good reason. They are of course unmatched, leading to the fact that it is difficult to preload them properly in either a DB or DF configuration.

I've wrote NC Cams to give his opinion on just setting some preload on the bearings with a torque wrench, but he told me to buy matched pairs and fabricate exact spacers, otherwise I could easily ruin the bearings, because preloading with a torque wrench was too unpredictable.

Problem is, that I don't think it's possible for me to make those spacers precise enough. Another problem is the money required to buy those matched bearings.

-------------------------------------------

Well, here is the deal (and please correct me if I'm wrong)

When reading on the NSK homepage, I saw this Constant Preload configuration and this seems to be my only way out. As you can see on my drawings, the bearings are seperated with two Belleville springs in series. Combusting the washers with 75% of their span, gives a preload of 1170N. The preload is forced onto the two bearings, given that they will each be dealing with 585N.

The force from the ball screw is around 200-300N, so the preload should be heavy enough to withstand that force in either direction, or?

The nominal heavy preload for that particularly bearing is 78.5N, but I assume that 585N will not be any deal to the bearings? Does that EXTRA HEAVY preload affect the bearings in a negative way? Important is, that the bearings are always preloaded, I guess. This should just be a way to have some kind of control over the situation.

Long thread, I know. Hopefully it can be useful to other members.


CNCDevil
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Ball Screw_Fixed Bearing X31.JPG‎
Views:	242
Size:	107.8 KB
ID:	65765   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ball Screw_Fixed Bearing X3 A1.JPG‎
Views:	187
Size:	63.3 KB
ID:	65766  
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 08-31-2008, 07:40 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 38
snoopy27 is on a distinguished road
Exclamation

Originally Posted by CNCDevil View Post
This thread is a question about mounting unmatched A/C bearing in a homemade housing, using Belleville washers to achive a so called "Constant Pressure Preload".
I know that this is just another thread in the line many, but I couldn'd really find alot of posts where this subject is discussed in detail.


In the early stage of building my new router, I decided to make my own fixed bearings units, because they were awfullly expensive. How hard could it be just to mount two bearings in a housing? - Now I have learned why

The nuts and screws, which are the heart to accuracy of the system, won't be to any good, without the use of proper bearings. I just mean, that the quality of the bearing setup, should equal the quality of nut/screw. My learning curve regarding A/C bearings have been quite vertical these days.

A week ago, I bought some NSK/IBU 7201 B A/C bearings from Ebay, to use with my 16mm ball screws. As I was digging into the subject of fixed bearings, I got pretty frustrated. I've found out that it is impossible for me to make a decent DB or DF preload configuration. As the more "educated" person can see, there is not given a lot of details about the bearings, with good reason. They are of course unmatched, leading to the fact that it is difficult to preload them properly in either a DB or DF configuration.

I've wrote NC Cams to give his opinion on just setting some preload on the bearings with a torque wrench, but he told me to buy matched pairs and fabricate exact spacers, otherwise I could easily ruin the bearings, because preloading with a torque wrench was too unpredictable.

Problem is, that I don't think it's possible for me to make those spacers precise enough. Another problem is the money required to buy those matched bearings.

-------------------------------------------

Well, here is the deal (and please correct me if I'm wrong)

When reading on the NSK homepage, I saw this Constant Preload configuration and this seems to be my only way out. As you can see on my drawings, the bearings are seperated with two Belleville springs in series. Combusting the washers with 75% of their span, gives a preload of 1170N. The preload is forced onto the two bearings, given that they will each be dealing with 585N.

The force from the ball screw is around 200-300N, so the preload should be heavy enough to withstand that force in either direction, or?

The nominal heavy preload for that particularly bearing is 78.5N, but I assume that 585N will not be any deal to the bearings? Does that EXTRA HEAVY preload affect the bearings in a negative way? Important is, that the bearings are always preloaded, I guess. This should just be a way to have some kind of control over the situation.

Long thread, I know. Hopefully it can be useful to other members.


CNCDevil
This is interesting to me since I am looking at some bellevile washers to take the backlash out of a small acme srew brass nut, by splitting it. I am no expert on this issue, but have a few question after doing some light research on this issue.

1. Will the washers you are using place even pressure on all sides of the raceways?
2. How are you determining you won't destroy the bearings with excessive preload force? It isn't clear to me from your comments or drawing to me yet?
3. What type of Bellevile washers are you using?
4. Have you considered wave type Bellevile washers since they place even pressure when compressed in all directions? Although they limit surface contact area they might be worth considering.

Would be very interested to know how you make out with this idea.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 09-01-2008, 12:27 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 81
CNCDevil is on a distinguished road

Hello snoopy27

1. Belleville washers will apply even force around the rings.

2. I just know that the bearings can withstand a lot of force. I don't have the number, but we are talking 5-10 times the preload force. I think the preload force has something to do with the stiffness of the radial and axial movement.

3. The Belleville washers are DIN 2093. D=31.5mm d=12,3 W=1.25mm

4. I haven't considered wave type Bellevile washers. I don't think they can apply as much force as the coned B/W. Besides, I'm pretty sure that coned B/W will apply a more even force around the rings.


I think I will just try to make those bearings and see what happens. The forces applied by the ball screws aren't that big, so I really think that it will work out. I could incorporate some extra space in the housing, so that the force can be ajusted by shims, as needbe.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 09-01-2008, 01:44 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,209
RICHARD ZASTROW is on a distinguished road

CNCDevil, Get a bearing catalog that has your bearing specs in it. In the technical sections load, speed and bearing life expectations are usually described.

My guess is you will find load will increase with preload, speed and life expectancy will decrease.

I agree with NCCams, use a matched set of bearings at the level of precision you require.

By the time you get a "custom substitution" for a proven method perfected, you'll probably spend more $$$$ on the "substitute" than the proven method anyway.

Dick Z
__________________
DZASTR
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 09-01-2008, 05:03 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 81
CNCDevil is on a distinguished road

First of all, you are right. I know that this is the professional way to do it and this is what all high-end machines got, but I have come up with another idea, that I want people speculate about.


As we agree, the preload is set to obtain radial and axial stiffness applied to the spindle. The preload is also important to ensure, that the balls will not tumble between the two raceways. I assume this is why the manufactures also state a "miminum load". Please correct me, if my assumptions are wrong.


In this setup, think of a DB configuration, with the bearings spaced apart e.g. 5mm, not making contact at all:

Let's say that the outer rings of the two bearings are independently fixed in place inside the bearing housing. There are two B/W washers in place outside of the bearings, applying a constant force of 78,5N to the inner rings (nominal heavy preload). This should ultimately cause a differential movement between the outer and inner rings, equal to the space between the inner rings in a true DB configuration, where the inner rings faces make contact, when the lock nut is firmly tightened.

Professional unit: Differential space gives Force (preload)

Unit with B/W: Force (preload) gives differential space

My point is, that it would cause the same effect.


Assumptions/experience:

Thus the lock nut is only fitted by your fingers, it will tightly fit the spindle in place (direct contact of metal to metal). The fitting by fingers will not cause any significant preload to the inner rings. All in all, you now have good control over the preload, knowing that it will be within an acceptable range of what's the nominal values. NC Cams wrote, that the more preload, the better, so a little extra will not hurt. Besides, it's far, far lower than the bearings load rating. All in all, the balls are now unable to tumble and the spindle will be well fixed.



Does this sound too weird? I KNOW, that this is not the professional way to make a unit, but if to use unmatched bearings and if it's all about preload control, wouldn't it be the next best solution to make a fixed unit?


What do you guys think?



CNCDevil
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 09-02-2008, 12:34 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,209
RICHARD ZASTROW is on a distinguished road

CNCDevil, There's another little piece missing here. It's "unloading force". This is the force acting against the preload. If the unloading force is exceeded, the balls will "tumble".

I don't have an NSK catalog with that spec., but my FAG/BARDEN book has the spec. for their bearings. B7201C (15 deg. contact angle) is L=108N, M=422N, H=971N.
The B7201E (25 deg. contact angle) is L=136N, M=576N, H=1319N.

In your post#1, you mention these bearings are to be used in a ball screw application. In post#5 you mention spindle.

For a ball screw I'd recommend the highest angle with heaviest preload that the bearing speed will allow. Normally, screws aren't subjected to the speed and radial forces that a spindle must contend with.

I,d still follow CNC Cams recommendation. lol

Dick Z
__________________
DZASTR
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 09-02-2008, 05:07 PM
mc-motorsports's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,084
mc-motorsports is on a distinguished road

Ballscrew bearings and spindle bearings are two diffrent things. The thumbnails attached above make no sense in a spindle. If your building a spindle, just put the bearings in direct contact with eachother. If you REALLY think a 5mm spacer will help, make a set with a rotary grider, ID/OD grinder or surface grinder, .0002" absolute max perpendicular and parrallel. And no, I can't spell for crap.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 09-02-2008, 05:13 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 81
CNCDevil is on a distinguished road

Well, they are ball screws. Spindle could either mean ball screw spindle or ACME spindle.

As you say "minimum unloading force" and if I understand you correctly, the preload force should be minimum the force that the spindle is transferring to the bearings? Otherwise it would "loosen up" the preload by exceeding this force and lead to ball tumbling? Then the preload should by chosen from the standpoint, on how much load the spindle will transfer to the bearings. If this is not what you mean, then please explain.


Realistic point of view:

My bearings has a 40 degree contact angle, so they can withstand a lot of force. In my machine setup, the load carried on by the spindle will in a worst case scenario, not exceed more than 300N and the spindle speed is low, not more than a absolute maximum of 1000 rpm on rapid moves. The acc. is fairly low too. Also, it will not run 24 hours per day continously.

For my particular application, I think the bearings are pretty well oversized and are actually to be used in a much more aggressive environment. It's not that I not want a professional machine, but if the bearings has a load safety factor that's far beyond what's normally recommended, then it would be unrealistic to put alot of efford in trying to make it even better. I'm a perfectionist and will not tolerate low quality, but I'm trying to see things a perspective here.



CNCDevil

Last edited by CNCDevil; 09-02-2008 at 07:12 PM.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 09-02-2008, 05:35 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 81
CNCDevil is on a distinguished road

mc-motorsports, I'm not going to put a 5mm spacer in between. The tumbnails in my first post has nothing to do with post number 5. If you read carefully, this is a different setup.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 09-02-2008, 08:32 PM
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 310
Mike Everman is on a distinguished road

What you are proposing is perfectly fine to do, within certain limits of precision.
Those limits on precision will have to do with the fact that you have a slip fit on the ID of the bearing so the spring can do its work, and the radial movement that this allows between bearing and shaft. There's also the wobble that this clearance can allow, with only the flatness of the BW set to correct it, or more probably make it happen.
Of course it can be made with extremely little clearance, with some care.
Precision ground duplex pairs depend on/require "transitional fits" which you can read as "light press-fit", which makes spring preloading impossible, but the highest accuracy Possible, as there is no radial clearance.

You will probably be fine, but for me personally, I'd keep looking for a duplex pair ground for light preload and spend my time on making the diameter fits right.
__________________
Mike Visit my projects blog at: http://mikeeverman.com/
http://www.bell-evermannews.com/ http://www.bell-everman.com
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 09-02-2008, 09:09 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 81
CNCDevil is on a distinguished road

Thank you for your comment on this one.

I know my lathe well and can make the spindle diam 0.01mm smaller than the inside bearing ring diameter. I assume that wouldn't cause any significant wobble with the relatively low rpm?

Maybe I'm just the one to try this out and take weekly notices of the bearing blocks condition. Then we could all gain a learning experience and get the issue settled. As I hope, it could be a relatively cheap way for people to make their own blocks, if they would bother to invest the time in the manual work. Me, I have great pleassure every time I get nearby a lathe or mill
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 09-03-2008, 11:27 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,209
RICHARD ZASTROW is on a distinguished road

CNCDevil, Please do not think we're being overly critical, we're trying to be helpful.

The method you propose has been discussed before and pretty much abandoned. But who knows? You may develop a better mouse trap!!!!

Regarding "spindle"; What you are referring to as a spindle I would call lead screw bearing seat. To me a spindle is either a work spindle like where your lathe chuck is attached or a cutter spindle where an end mill is attached. I suppose it's a local thing. lol

Proceed as you wish. Just for fun, keep track of time/cost and see if you actually meet your objective at what cost.

Good Luck!!

Dick Z
__________________
DZASTR
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
a/c, angular, ball, bearing, fixed




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
changing belville washers Shizzlemah Fadal 1 10-19-2006 11:48 AM
RFQ: Aluminum Washers kellogs72 Employment Opportunity 4 12-24-2005 10:48 PM
Bearing Nuts & Locking Washers For Spindles? Willyb Benchtop Machines 2 11-27-2005 12:21 AM
machining washers MBG General Metalwork Discussion 6 03-10-2005 02:44 PM
RFQ: Washers kellogs72 Employment Opportunity 4 02-21-2005 07:00 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353