![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Linear and Rotary Motion Discuss ball/Acme screws, R&P, linear slides and theory here. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
I built a mill using some 10 mm lead ground ball screws. The screws are in good shape. My Z axis is actually an IKO cast iron slide. The Z weighs maybe 70 pounds and I do have a 30 pound gas spring on the column. Initially I was driving this axis direct with 495 oz steppers and 203V's on a 72 VDC PS. I was finding if I take too much of a plunge when drilling, I would loose steps every now and then. This was easy to see. I bout some nice 1/2" metal timing pulleys and belt from SDPS. Motor pulley has 10 teeth. Screw pulley has 20. I am running the machine in inch mode. I measure the travel awhile back when it was in direct drive and my steps per inch settings were very close IIRC. I have all three axes set @ 5080. This belt drive should have changed the settings to 10160. I find I have to set it at 10390 instead to get .0008" accuracy. Meaning I tell it to move an inch and it moves that much shy and twice that for two inches. Still very acceptable for me especially on the Z. I rarely even cut anything over 1/2" thick. X and Y still seem perfect @ the 5080 setting or at least this close. My question is why the math is so far off? Well not really that far, but farther than I expected. It there an extra tooth on the large pulley that shouldn't be there? Like 10 to 19 or something? The belt is a nice one and really has no or very little stretch. Here is the formula I used to calculate steps. 10 mm lead = 25.4 mm per inch or 2.54 turns per inch. 2.54 x 200 motor steps = 508 508 x 2 for pulley ratio of 1 to 2 = 1016 1016 x 10 microsteps = 10160 steps per inch Why am I having to add 230 steps? Granted I need to recheck the X and Y again because I haven't done it in awhile and I have changed lots of things around in Mach since I checked. No big deal really, just curious to see if any of you had something similar. Any ideas? Thanks
__________________ Lee |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Try using the ratio of the pulleys pitch diameters, and not just using 2:1. I was going to post this the other day, but am not completely sure if that's right.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Thanks Gerry. Not sure how to go about that either. I did check the X and Y again and they are perfect with direct drive, so the screw counts I am using are good. The screw on the Z appears to be identical and was close to perfect as well before the belt addition. It really isn't a problem as I mentioned before. .0008" is plenty good accuracy for what I do. I could even nail it a little closer by adding a step or two. Here are the pulley specs anyway. It could be that there is one groove or tooth on a pulley that is not being accounted for at a 1 to 2 ratio. Motor pulley. Part Number A 6A 4-10DF05012 Unit Inch Pitch .375 (L) No. Of Grooves 10 Material Aluminum Alloy Belt Width 0.5 Bore Size 0.375" Flange & Hub Configuration 2 Flanges / With Hub Pitch Dia. 1.194" Outside Dia. 1.164" Overall Length 1.125" Hub Dia. 0.88" Screw pulley. Part Number A 6A 4-20DF05016 Unit Inch Pitch .375 (L) No. Of Grooves 20 Material Aluminum Alloy Belt Width 0.5 Bore Size 0.500" Flange & Hub Configuration 2 Flanges / With Hub Pitch Dia. 2.387" Outside Dia. 2.357" Overall Length 1.313" Hub Dia. 1.81" Now when I multiply the pitch diameters, it doesn't come out to exactly 1 to 2. It comes out to 2.388" instead of 2.387". This would seem to be about the ratio that this is off.
__________________ Lee |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| That could be due to rounding errors, but I don't really know what's going on.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| May also be effected by the conversion of metric to inch is something like 25.4000000003 mm per inch. My light weight oil is fatter than that tiny little 3 there on the end. ![]() It likely is rounding errors though, Gerry. I think you might be right. That wouldn't even be noticeable on my router. Well it's not noticeable on the mill either, but I was shooting for as precise as possible. Might as well with preloaded ground ball screws. ![]() In contrast, I think my little lathe has about 8" of backlash on the X. ![]() Maybe not quite that much. I bought some 3/8" precision acme rod and anti backlash delrin nuts to fix that rascal with though. Thats another thread altogether.
__________________ Lee |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| (Programmed/Actual) * Old Units Per = New Unit Per No silly gear math required. There are imperfections on every component. You are dealing with imperfect lead screws, belts, and gears that have a tolerance variation to throw your math off. Last edited by WayneHill; 04-02-2008 at 08:45 AM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Metric to inch conversion | BobF | Mach Software (ArtSoft software) | 3 | 12-28-2007 10:53 AM |
| inch metric alarm | bigbobr | Fanuc | 0 | 11-15-2007 12:40 PM |
| DRO - Metric or Inch | DJ Morrow | General Electronics Discussion | 2 | 11-15-2004 02:06 PM |
| Metric vs Inch - arguements pro & con | DJ Morrow | Mini Lathe | 10 | 08-12-2004 08:46 AM |