CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Mechanical Engineering > Linear and Rotary Motion


Linear and Rotary Motion Discuss ball/Acme screws, R&P, linear slides and theory here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 03-21-2006, 05:02 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 20
stevesplanes is on a distinguished road
Duel Rack and Pinion Drives

I've decided, due to cost and the fact I have two five foot racks, to dirve my gantry from both sides. This is necessary as I expect that my plunging z-axis will break the x-y plane. They are from Tourchmate and they are 24 pitch 14.5 degree power angle. I want to accomplich foam miling so speeds up to 50 inches per minute are not too fast. I am driving with a 254 Pacific Scientific M22 series stepper motor.

How does one tie the two sides together so that they don't work againts eachother.


Steve
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 03-21-2006, 08:09 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Paris, Texas
Posts: 383
dneisler is on a distinguished road

I am building the CadCut design router, they use racks on each side, and they have a drive shaft that extends all the way across with a belt setup in the middle.
__________________
***For full up to date details visit my blog @ www.donald-neisler.com
Donald Neisler
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 03-22-2006, 08:15 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 20
stevesplanes is on a distinguished road
Duel Rack and Pininon.

Belt Driven from the center. Can I get a picture or two.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 03-22-2006, 09:12 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,984
turmite is on a distinguished road

Hi Steve,

I use an old Digital Tool machine that is huge. When configured properly it would cut anywhere on a 5'X9' sheet of mdf or other sheet material with two heads that were 8" apart. It is driven with one stepper using the two rack and pinion setup. My machine has the motor mounted on one side and the drive axle spans the width of the machine which is nearly 8'. The only problems I have encountered are:
1. At high rapids in excess of 300ipm the long shaft sets up a little vibration but not bad.
2. The way the company designed this interferred with the z clearence. I could have had about another 3-4" of z clearence if it had been raised up.

I currently carve foam with my machine at 200 ipm, at least on pieces large enough to get the speed.

Mike
__________________
No greater love can a man have than this, that he give his life for a friend.
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 03-22-2006, 09:18 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 50
CAM_MAN is on a distinguished road
Cad Cut Shaft

I have built the Cad Cut Router myself. The design for the single shaft really doesn't work that well. There really is a lot of twisting going on with the shaft. Even though in the design the shaft is split into two pieces then tied together with a coupler it is still a nightmare to get the gears aligned right. The major flaw is that the shafts are fixed in the side panels and there is no way to adjust the pinion gear up and down. The only way to make adjustments is to move the gear rack up and down which is a very tedious project and will never be just right. I have had a lot of gear wear and probably only have about 100 hours on the machine. I constantly have to adjust the rack to keep any descent tolerance. I would advise you to go with a dual drive on the rack. When I have some time I will be redisigning mine to that. By the way I pity any poor soul who has bought the Cad Cut plans. I had to do a lot of redesigning and improvising to get mine together. And as far as any help from Cad Cut forget it, figure it out youreslf.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 03-22-2006, 02:56 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 20
stevesplanes is on a distinguished road

Can I conclude that each side should have an independant gear height adjustment and that the lond connecting rods act as a torsional spring? Inquiring about driveing my x-axis with two steppers is my next path. Earlier advise was not to try to use two steppers to drive the x-axis, a thought I originally thought would not olny solve the drive height adjustement problem but also almost double the driving force.

Does anyone know anyone using two steppers to drive the x axis?
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 03-22-2006, 05:07 PM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 20,457
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by stevesplanes
Does anyone know anyone using two steppers to drive the x axis?
Lots of people drive gantry's with 2 motors. You'll find that of people that reply to this question, half will say it's a bad idea, and the other half that actually do it have no problems. Mach3 has a slaving option to drive the 2 motors together, always in synch.

Shopbot's have always used 2 motors to drive their gantry's, rack and pinion too. You can see how they do it in their assembly manual, page 24 I think. http://www.shopbottools.com/files/SB...y%20Manual.pdf
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 03-22-2006, 05:33 PM
Bloy2004's Avatar
Fumbling Machinist
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sturgeon Bay, WI
Posts: 892
Bloy2004 is on a distinguished road

I'm from the half that uses two motors and two rack/pinion sets on each side of the gantry. It works just great using Mach3 and "slaving" the motors together in sync as Gerry points out. Once set up, both fault together, both drive together, both align together when homed..... without any problems.......very reliable.

The advantage of this is no racking of the gantry due to load forces flexing through the cross drive shaft and extra drive force with the two motors. It may cost a little more, but you only have to duplicate your work on each end of the gantry rather than rigging the system with a drive shaft crossing to both sides.

John(bloy)

Here's my early construction of the dual drive axis. But I got lucky and found those 1:12(or is it 12:1?) motor/reducer units cheap on ebay.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Gantry mounted on THK rails.JPG‎
Views:	363
Size:	56.1 KB
ID:	15904  
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 03-22-2006, 06:10 PM
rugludallur's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Iceland
Age: 32
Posts: 52
rugludallur is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up Larger gantry machines require dual drive

I did a bit of research before building my plasma cutting table and I was unable to find any other solution with decent results.

Belts have to much stretch/play when dealing with these lengths
Chains have to be tensioned so tight that they wear out very quickly
Drive shafts are impractical because of weight, balancing and twist
Driving the gantry from one side only is impossible without adding massive weight.

In my case I have a dual pinion setup on each track. Both ends of the gantry have a motor with a pulley/belt system (3/1 redution) which powers two pinions on the track, this way I can tension the belt between the pinions to eliminate backlash/play and get a 3/1 reduction for cheap.

http://www.dallur.com/index.php?id=4...maxwidth]=1024
http://www.dallur.com/index.php?id=4...maxwidth]=1024
http://www.dallur.com/index.php?id=4...maxwidth]=1024
http://www.dallur.com/index.php?id=4...1;colrows]=1x1

Since these pictures were taken I have replaced the nylon pulleys with aluminum and the belts with low stretch kevlar reinforced urithane.

Jarl

Last edited by rugludallur; 03-23-2006 at 09:24 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 03-22-2006, 10:49 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,984
turmite is on a distinguished road

I'm not sure I follow the logic that a motor on one side using drive pinions on both sides connected with a shaft allows racking of the gantry. It sure doesn't on mine! I have used this machine since 1991 and have never had a problem with racking, backlash or other problems I'm supposed to have according to everyone who has spoken on this issue. Are you guys speaking from experience, or rumor? A single motor setup like I have is the least expensive to build, but that does not make it any less efficient. Now, the fact the ways are Bishop/Wisecarver may make the design easier, but I doubt it.

Mike
__________________
No greater love can a man have than this, that he give his life for a friend.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 03-23-2006, 04:07 AM
rugludallur's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Iceland
Age: 32
Posts: 52
rugludallur is on a distinguished road
I think it is a matter of size/accuracy/price

I personally have no experience with driving a large table with a single motor on one end since I don't see any logical reason to do it.
I would love to see some pictures and get an idea of the accuracy. How big are you motors, what is the diameter of your drive shaft and is there gearing for higher rpm on the shaft ?
Asside from your Digital Tool machine I know Knuth also has CNC tables that have this setup but their Gantry is really big and really heavy.

It is possible to build a table in this manner but in the end I think that the price/effort of building it would be more than the extra motor/driver ($300). It might make more sense for a commerical factory which can probably source the driveshaft for much less than the electronics and motor.

When I considered using a shaft in my case it meant that I would need a 2.5m (8ft) shaft.
1 turn of the shaft translates to roughly 15mm travel on the table so twist is a problem.
The only way to reduce twist without adding weight is to gear up the shaft and spin it faster (torque*rpm=power -> more rpm = less torque = less twist) and anti-backlash 1/10 gearboxes which can handle up to 1000 lb/in cost around $800 each.

Since my lathe can only handle stock up to 1.8m and the drive shaft would be impossible to mount due to deflection I would have to buy a precision ground pre-hardened drive shaft 1" diameter and at 8' it's expensive and heavy (10kg. $250) (My gantry weighs 35kg)

So I'm either stuck with a 1" drive shaft or 2x $800 gearboxes both of which make me sad. For reference the total I have spent on my table so far is $3000 out of which the cable chains were $1000 but the drivers/motors were $500.

The way I look at it is that for $50 more than the shaft I can get twice the amount of power for my axis, eliminate all twist/backlash problems and save 8kg of weight in the gantry.
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 03-23-2006, 08:16 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 170
CNC Pro is on a distinguished road

Hey turmite,
I also have an old Digital Tool machine (84” * 168” table size). I recall seeing an optional drive axle available (I think it was 1” or 1-1/4” diameter) from DT to address the vibration issue.
I also have a Larken router (66” *126” table size) which has twin ball screw drive with a motor on each screw. I often run large orders on both machines with no discrepancies between parts coming off either machine.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361